# Backlog Bonanza YYYY-MM-DD
[GitHub query](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AC-tracking-issue+label%3AT-lang)
## What are we DOING?
* Take things that have been unstable for a while and "disposition them".
* Goal: Everything that is nightly only has one or more of the following labels, indicating the blocker(s) to stabilizing it:
* S-tracking-ready-to-stabilize: Needs a stabilization PR (good to go :train:)
* S-tracking-needs-to-bake: Needs time to bake (set a date? other criteria?)
* S-tracking-impl-incomplete: Not code complete or blocking bugs
* S-tracking-unimplemented: Implementation not begun
* S-tracking-design-concerns: Blocking design concerns
* This might be "doesn't quite seem to deliver value we hoped for" or "something doesn't feel right"
* S-tracking-perma-unstable
* Internal implementation detail of rustc, stdlib
* S-tracking-needs-investigation
Attendance: Josh, Felix, Scott, Mark
## Tracking Issue for try_trait_v2, A new design for the ? desugaring (RFC#3058) #84277
* A bunch of conversation around restructuring the trait hierarchy/design
* Some discussions with Jane + Mara on this
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84277#issuecomment-1066120333 has a concrete proposal
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84277#issuecomment-1078700107 is another version
* desugaring likely to stay approximately the same, but traits might change
* Design concerns, but mostly around finalizing the trait design, no major changes to the language semantic expected
## Tracking Issue for RFC 2528: type-changing struct update syntax #86555
* Implemented, no known blockers, marking as ready to stabilize (needs docs + stabilization report)
## Tracking issue: deref patterns #87121
* Somewhat active Zulip etc.
* impl-incomplete
## Tracking Issue for RFC 3137: let-else statements #87335
* Active work on the MIR/HIR parts, seems nearly there
* impl-incomplete for now though.
## Tracking Issue for #[track_caller] on closures #87417
* S-ready-to-stabilize
```rust
#![feature(closure_track_caller)]
fn foo() -> impl Fn() {
#[track_caller] || { panic!(); }
}
fn main() {
foo()()
}
```
I thought this worked, but no:
```
error[E0658]: attributes on expressions are experimental
--> src/main.rs:2:13
|
2 | let x = #[inline] || ();
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #15701 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
## Tracking Issue for "Overconstraining and omitting unsafe in impls of unsafe trait methods" (RFC 2316) #87919
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87919
* No implementation
* [RFC 3245](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3245) is an enhancement, but not coupling to this one
## Tracking Issue for RFC: Supertrait Item Shadowing #89151
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89151
* Felix to bring up in compiler meeting
## Tracking Issue for deref_into_dyn_supertrait compatibility lint #89460
tracking issue for trait upcasting: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65991
We think the lint probably needs movement/understanding before we can stabilize #65991, and also don't really recall seeing this lint discussed before.
## https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89554
* Ready to stabilize
## Tracking Issue for RFC #2972: Constrained Naked Functions #90957
PR for stabilization: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93587
## Tracking Issue for static async fn in traits #91611
* implementation can proceed, but stabilization would be blocked on GATs.
## Tracking Issue for enabling elided_lifetimes_in_paths lints #91639