--- tags: weekly, rustc --- # T-compiler Meeting Agenda 2020-08-13 [Tracking Issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54818) ## Announcements - Next thursday 20th is RustConf - New MCPs (take a look, see if you like them!) - "Stabilise `link-self-contained` option" [compiler-team#343](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/343) - Old MCPs (not seconded, take a look) - "Integration of the Cranelift backend with rustc" [compiler-team#270](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/270) - "Decentralize queries" [compiler-team#277](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/277) - "Infer hidden types without replacing with an inference variable" [compiler-team#325](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/325) - "Stabilizable subset of const generics" [compiler-team#332](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/332) - "Move the compiler to a new `compiler/` directory" [compiler-team#336](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/336) - "Form t-compiler/wg-parser-library" [compiler-team#338](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/338) - Pending FCP requests (check your boxes!) - No pending FCP requests this time. - Things in FCP (make sure you're good with it) - "refactor types to fit the chalk-ty generic plan" [compiler-team#341](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/341) - Accepted MCPs - "Create a WebAssembly target notification group." [compiler-team#337](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/337) - "Set ninja=true by default" [compiler-team#339](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/339) - "Implement const equality and const wf" [compiler-team#340](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/340) - Finalized FCPs - No new finished FCP this time. ### WG checkins @*WG-rls2.0* checkin by @**matklad**: * RFC2912 (move from rls to rust-analyzer) * soft-blocked on merging VS Code extensions: https://github.com/rust-lang/vscode-rust/issues/812. * rust-analyzer is available via rustup, but update procedure for rust-lang/rust is not smooth: rust-analyzer often fails to build for weird targets. * Library-ification * Started the effort to extract the parser (there's an MCP to form a parser library-ification wg, to improve communication) * No big progress yet, mostly looking around at existing code * Un-Grammar for concrete syntax trees: https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/blob/master/rust.ungram * Could we use it to generate rustc's AST? Seems unlikely :( * Some glances at name resolution -- it seems like it should be possible to extract a small core of "set of 'module' scopes with names + fixed point iteration", but this is low priority for now. * Org * Microsoft will sponsor rust-analyzer a bit via GitHub Sponsors: https://twitter.com/jeffwilcox/status/1293678932433055745 * Misc * Perf Dashboard https://rust-analyzer.github.io/metrics/ * Automatic reload on Cargo.toml changes @*WG-self-profile* checkin by @**wesleywiser**: - @**nagisa** contributed some [improved documentation](https://github.com/rust-lang/measureme/pull/118), [bug fixes and other enhancements](https://github.com/rust-lang/measureme/pull/119). - @**Mark-Simulacrum** updated perf.rlo to include flamegraphs, Chrome-profiler data and the raw self-profile output on new runs. (See [the new links on the details page](https://perf.rust-lang.org/detailed-query.html?commit=3fbed1739c384faabf00cd8a62abedbf506e949b&base_commit=4a689da944977496fb758cc2d700984cc6a10b7f&benchmark=style-servo-debug&run_name=full)) - @**michaelwoerister** has [a PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75452) up to shrink self-profile string data from detailed rustc invocations by 8-9%. - @**eddyb** has been working on using hardware counters (`rdpmc` instruction) to capture instruction counts instead of user-space timings. This is still work in progress but you can follow along in [this Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/247081-t-compiler.2Fperformance). ## Beta-nominations [T-compiler](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aall+label%3Abeta-nominated+-label%3Abeta-accepted+label%3AT-compiler) - "Fix regionck failure when converting Index to IndexMut" [rust#74960](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74960) - Fixes [a `P-critical` beta regression](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74933) that regressed in [rust#73504](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73504) which is a roll-up, likely [rust#72280](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72280) - PR by @**Gary Guo** and assigned to @**nikomatsakis** - "Fix ICE #75307 in `format`" [rust#75319](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75319) - Fixes [a `P-medium` issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75307) - PR by @**Esteban Küber** and assigned to @**eddyb** [libs-impl](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aall+label%3Abeta-nominated+-label%3Abeta-accepted+label%3Alibs-impl) - No beta nominations this time. [T-rustdoc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aall+label%3Abeta-nominated+-label%3Abeta-accepted+label%3AT-rustdoc) - No beta nominations this time. :back: / :shrug: / :hand: ## Stable-nominations [T-compiler](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aall+label%3Astable-nominated+-label%3Astable-accepted+label%3AT-compiler) - No stable nominations this time. [libs-impl](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aall+label%3Astable-nominated+-label%3Astable-accepted+label%3Alibs-impl) - No stable nominations this time. [T-rustdoc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aall+label%3Astable-nominated+-label%3Astable-accepted+label%3AT-rustdoc) - No stable nominations this time. :back: / :shrug: / :hand: ## PR's S-waiting-on-team [T-compiler](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AS-waiting-on-team+label%3AT-compiler) - No PRs waiting on T-compiler this time. [libs-impl](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AS-waiting-on-team+label%3Alibs-impl) - No PRs waiting on libs-impl this time. ## Issues of Note ### Short Summary - [3 T-compiler P-critical issues](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AT-compiler+label%3AP-critical+) - [1 of those are unassigned](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AT-compiler+label%3AP-critical+no%3Aassignee) - [52 T-compiler P-high issues](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AT-compiler+label%3AP-high+) - [30 of those are unassigned](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AT-compiler+label%3AP-high+no%3Aassignee) - [2 P-critical, 2 P-high, 3 P-medium, 1 P-low regression-from-stable-to-beta](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/regression-from-stable-to-beta) - [0 P-critical, 2 P-high, 6 P-medium, 1 P-low regression-from-stable-to-nightly](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/regression-from-stable-to-nightly) - [1 P-critical, 15 P-high, 50 P-medium, 5 P-low regression-from-stable-to-stable](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/regression-from-stable-to-stable) ### P-critical [T-compiler](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=label%3AP-critical+label%3AT-compiler) - "LTO triggers apparent miscompilation on Windows 10 x64" [rust#74498](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74498) - Discussed last week - Assigned to @**pnkfelix** - I-unsound stable regression, started failing when we updated to LLVM 9.0 - [LLVM issue reproduced on LLVM master](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74498#issuecomment-661950983) - Rust started to trigger this misbehavior more frequent since the introduction of [rust#69659](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69659) that happened in 1.45+. - @**pnkfelix** [filled a bug with LLVM upstream](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46943) - [According to @**pnkfelix**](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74498#issuecomment-667452406) the remaining question is if we should, for the short term, change that `range.rs` code to not used an `unchecked_add`, in order to (hopefully) bypass the misoptimization here or patch LLVM. - @**pnkfelix** [also discusses](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74498#issuecomment-668598776) if this generates an overflow or not. - "Unexpected trait resolution overflow error" [rust#74868](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74868) - Assigned to @**pnkfelix** and @**Matthew Jasper** - Needs MCVE and bisection - Possible culprits [rust#73357](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73357) or [rust#73261](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73261) maybe? - According to @**Matthew Jasper** this is probably due to [rust#73452](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73452), [rust#73905](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73905) fixes that issue but is not suitable for a backport. @**Matthew Jasper** is going to provide a PR suitable for a backport. - "Panic when compiling gluon on 1.46" [rust#75313](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75313) - It is unassigned - It's a beta regression, regressed in [rust#72796](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72796) - @**RalfJ** [provided a PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75419) [libs-impl](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AP-critical+label%3Alibs-impl) - No P-critical issues for libs-impl this time. [T-rustdoc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3AP-critical+label%3AT-rustdoc) - No P-critical issues for T-rustdoc this time. ### Unassigned P-high regressions [Beta regressions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3Aregression-from-stable-to-beta+P-high+no%3Aassignee) - "libtest panics when running `should_panic` tests under QEMU armv7 " [rust#74820](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74820) - Cargo lib skeleton + should_panic test code fails on armv7 - It seems to be caused by [rust#72746](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72746) by @**tmandry** [Nightly regressions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3Aregression-from-stable-to-nightly+P-high+no%3Aassignee) - "Type mismatch in function arguments E0631, E0271 are falsely recognized as E0308 mismatched types" [rust#74400](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74400) - Discussed last week - Regressed on [rust#73643](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73643) which is a rollup, likely to be [rust#72493](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72493) ## Performance logs Triage done by [simulacrum](https://github.com/Mark-Simulacrum). Revision range: [19cefa68640843956eedd86227ddc1d35dbc6754..8b84156c6ee2b4e707dc32f5a516e3143ab924d3](https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=19cefa68640843956eedd86227ddc1d35dbc6754&end=8b84156c6ee2b4e707dc32f5a516e3143ab924d3&absolute=false&stat=instructions%3Au) 1 regression, 1 improvement, 1 of them on rollups. 0 outstanding nags from last week. Regressions * [Rollup of 5 pull requests #75174](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75174) ([instructions](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=32d14eba47ee8bb0b5edb04bcf652517f81c4cf5&end=119d2a1a98fe87d4ae6cabf12134a0ef2fb95851)) Slight loss, up to 1%. Unclear if spurious. Likely caused by [Replace `Memoryblock` with `NonNull<[u8]>` #75152](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75152). Improvements * [Remove two fields from `SubstFolder` #75133](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75133) ([instructions](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=c9b80bb3ff194d488fdd95da2ef23bd466f921cb&end=d08eb98698cbce56e599324fb83d55eef2cac408)) Up to 2% wins on wf-projection stress test. New nags to follow up on * [#75174](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75152#issuecomment-672452770) ## Nominated Issues [T-compiler](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AI-nominated+label%3AT-compiler) - No nominated issues for T-compiler this time. [libs-impl](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3AI-nominated+label%3Alibs-impl) - No nominated issues for libs-impl this time.