<style> .reveal { font-family: Ubuntu !important; font-size: 20px; color: #222; } .reveal section > div > .footnote { position: absolute; bottom: -10em; font-size: 0.6em; text-align: left; } </style> # TSN Group Meeting 200505 Seamless Redundancy in TSN (II), 05/05 ---- ## [Defining a Reliable Network Topology in <br>Software-Defined Power Substations](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8617697) A. Leal and J. F. Botero (2019). <i>IEEE Access, 7</i>. ---- - TSN offers <i>stronger</i> redundancy solution (prev) - TSN offers <i>simpler</i> redundancy solution --- Seamless redundancy (for zero reconf. time) 1. Two-connectivity ⇒ Loops 2. Avoid broadcast storm ⇒ Loops handled 3. *No global view* ⇒ Loops handled **locally** ![broadcast-storm-problem](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Philipp_Hurni/publication/224126714/figure/fig2/AS:302575673987074@1449151070395/Broadcast-Storm-many-frame-transmissions-and-receptions-are-redundant.png) ---- IEC61850: solved from fixed topology <div style="display: flex"> ![prp-concept](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/mediastore_new/IEEE/content/media/6287639/8600701/8617697/leal16-2893114-large.gif) ![hsr-concept](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/mediastore_new/IEEE/content/media/6287639/8600701/8617697/leal17-2893114-large.gif) </div> ---- 1. Fixed topology - PRP suffers from doubled cost - HSR suffers from *low bandwidth, high latency* - High bandwidth required from substation controllers[1] - $21\mu s$ per-hop for typical GOOSE messages[2] 2. Fractional topology - Distinguish member streams within PRP/HSR networks ⇒ Special frame format introduced - Conversion between PRP/HSR networks ⇒ Special nodes introduced [1] H. Heine and D. Bindrich (2013). [Designing reliable high-performance IEC61850 substation communication networks based on PRP and HSR topologies](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6683439). <i>CIRED 2013</i>. [2] H. Heine and M. Petrovic (2019). [Redundant Communication Architectures: How They Benefit the Oil and Gas Industry](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8703384). <i>IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 25</i>(4). <!-- .element: class="footnote" --> ---- <!-- [Cut-Through and Store-and-Forward Ethernet Switching for Low-Latency Environments](https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-5020-switch/white_paper_c11-465436.pdf) | Cisco Whitepaper --> ![hsr-delay-per-hop](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/mediastore_new/IEEE/content/media/2943/8731864/8703384/heine13-2875264-large.gif) <!-- .element: class="desaturate" style="max-height: 600px" --> [2] H. Heine and M. Petrovic (2019). [Redundant Communication Architectures: How They Benefit the Oil and Gas Industry](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8703384). <i>IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 25</i>(4). <!-- .element: class="footnote" --> ---- Global view (SDN controller/TSN Qca advertisement) 1. Arbitary topology 2. Unified topology - No special frame format introduced - No special nodes introduced ![tsn-redundancy](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/mediastore_new/IEEE/content/media/7886829/8412445/8412458/8412458-fig-5-source-large.gif)
{"metaMigratedAt":"2023-06-15T09:22:27.307Z","metaMigratedFrom":"YAML","title":"TSN Group Meeting 200505","breaks":true,"slideOptions":"{\"theme\":\"white\",\"transition\":\"slide\"}","contributors":"[{\"id\":\"565c7790-86ed-4fda-a10f-acb3649e8723\",\"add\":3279,\"del\":25}]"}
    279 views