--- tags: PCL, Law School --- # 1L Contracts 2019 – 2020 > “…he laughed at him for imagining the dishonesty and covetousness of his countrymen could be restrained by written laws, which were like spiders’ webs, and would catch, it is true, the weak and poor, but easily be broken by the mighty and rich” — [Plutarch](http://classics.mit.edu/Plutarch/solon.html) *Solon* [PCL](http://www.peoplescollegeoflaw.edu) boilerplate with grading rubric, etc. included in pdf version of this syllabus. [Also here](https://hackmd.io/@rdsathene/rJYX1qPlv). See the [blog for this class](https://pcl1lcontracts.classcaster.net). Many thanks to Alex Rodriguez, Esq. of the Law Offices of Hirji and Chau, LLP for introducing PCL to CALI.org Casebook: Calamari, John D., *Cases and Problems on Contracts*. 6th EDITION., St. Paul, MN: West, 2011. Print. ISBN: [9780314202857](http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934351410) (or equivalent) ## Fall Quarter Syllabus ### Week 1 : September 5 Introduction to studying law, overview of contract law, law versus equity, **governing law** (Common Law v. UCC), goods, merchants. Reading and Assignments Casebook *BMC Industries, Inc. v. Barth Industries, Inc.* *Sally Beauty Co. v. Nexxus Products Co.* (only read Sections II. and III.) CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/17001 | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/750/CON60/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/665/REM04/6035/jq Optional: http://j.mp/2ZM6LJn *** ### Week 2 : September 12 **Mutual assent**, invitations to negotiate, advertisements, etc., implied/express, bilateral/unilateral. Reading and Assignments Casebook *Lucy v. Zehmer* *Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.* CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/16982?CON37P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/434/CON38/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lesson/16965?CON38P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/734/CON44/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/735/CON45/6035/jq Optional: *Balfour v. Balfour* | *Texaco v. Pennzoil* | https://www.cali.org/lesson/737?CON47 | https://www.cali.org/lesson/736?CON46 | https://www.cali.org/lesson/735?CON45 | http://j.mp/2ZO3uJx *** ### Week 3 : September 19 The **offer**, CL v. UCC, indefiniteness, duration of offers. Casebook *Lonergan v. Scolnick* *Fairmount Glass v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co* *Southwest Engineering Co. v. Martin Tractor* *Oglebay Norton Co. v. Armco, Inc.* CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/16924?CON39P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/435/CON39/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/818/CON63/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lesson/16933?CON40P Optional: *Haines v. City of New York* | *Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital* | *Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen v. Schumacher* | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/436/CON40/6035/jq *** ### Week 4 : September 26 Offer continued, **option** contracts, and (merchants') **firm offers**. Casebook *Beall v. Beall* CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/16946?CON41P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/731/CON41/6035/jq Optional: http://j.mp/33ofC6n | http://j.mp/2M9uoZn *** ### Week 5 : October 3 **Acceptance**, CL-mirror v. UCC reasonable, mailbox rule. Casebook *Broadnax v. Ledbetter* *MCC–Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino* *Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball* *Day v. Caton* *Ardente v. Horan* *Cantu v. Central Education Agency* CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/16932?CON61P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/815/CON61/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lesson/16999?CON62P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/814/CON62/6035/jq Optional: A.W. Brian Simpson, Quackery and Contract Law. (re: Carlill supra) | *Fujimoto v. Rio Grande Pickle Co.* | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/841/CON65/6035/jq | http://j.mp/2Mcx0pp *** ### Week 6 : October 10 **MIDTERM EXAMINATION** 60 minutes Acceptance continued, **battle of the forms**. Casebook *Dorton v. Collins & Aikman* *Diamond Fruit Growers v. Krack Corp.* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/822/CON64/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lesson/17120?CON64_1P | https://www.cali.org/lesson/17118?CON64_2P | https://www.cali.org/lesson/17119?CON64_3P Optional: https://www.cali.org/lesson/1045?CON64P | http://j.mp/2Mmktjm *** ### Week 7 : October 17 **Consideration**, bargain theory, modification, PMG, illusory, debts Casebook *Kim v. Son* *Hamer v. Sidway* *Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino* *Fiege v. Boehm* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/842/CON67/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/1120/CON71/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/1276/CON72/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/418/CON22/6035/jq Optional: *Kirksey v. Kirksey* | *Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. American Ash Recycling Corp.* | http://j.mp/2THM8Ms *** ### Week 8 : October 24 Consideration continued, **output & requirements**, **promissory estoppel** Casebook *BRC Rubber & Plastic, Inc. v. Continental Carbon Company* *Wiseco, Inc. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.* *Feinberg v. Pfeiffer Co* *Conrad v. Fields* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/742/CON52/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/417/CON21/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/7607/CON73/6035/jq Optional: *Summits 7, Inc. v. Kelly* | *Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.* *** ### Week 9 : October 31 Defenses to formation, **Statute of Frauds** Casebook *Ehrlich v. Diggs* *Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.* *Cohn v. Fisher* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/407/CON11/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lesson/16971?CON11_1P Optional: *C.R.Klewin, Inc. v. Flagship Properties* | "J.M. Perillo, The Statute of Frauds in the Light of the Functions and Dysfunctions of Form" | *McIntosh v. Murphy* | *Azevedo v. Minister* *** ### Week 10 : November 7 **Statute of Frauds** continued, review for final Casebook *Yarbro v. Neil B. McGinnis Equipment Co.* *Lawrence v. Anderson* *Dienst v. Dienst* *Shaughnessy v. Eidsmo* CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/16970?CON11_2P Optional: http://j.mp/2KCtQt9 *** ### Final Exam : November 14 *** ## Winter Quarter Syllabus ### Week 1 (11) : November 21 Review fall quarter final and material, all other **defenses to formation** Casebook *Cocharan v. Dellfava* *Maizitis v. TUV America, Inc.* *Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp* *Raffles v. Wichelhaus* (plus note) *Nelson v. Rice* *Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.* CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/16981?CON12P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/409/CON13/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/410/CON14/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lesson/17014?CON16P | https://www.cali.org/lesson/17025?CON18P | https://www.cali.org/lesson/1104?CON17P Optional: *T.F. v. B.L* | *Troutman v. Southern Railway Co* | *Gallon v. Lloyd-Thomas Co.* | *Sherwood v. Walker* | *White v. Berenda Mesa Water Dist.* | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/408/CON12/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/412/CON16/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/414/CON18/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/413/CON17/6035/jq *** ### Week 2 (12) : December 5 **Defenses to formation** continued Casebook *Pettit v. Liston* *Ortelere v. Teachers’ Retirement Board* *Cousineau v. Walker* *Bentley v. Slavik* CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/16976?CON15P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/411/CON15/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lesson/17026?CON19P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/415/CON19/6035/jq Optional: *Hoffman v. Chapman* | Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc* | *Smith v. Zimbalist* *** ### Week 3 (13) : December 12 Performance and **terms**, Parol Evidence Rule (**PER**) Casebook *Mitchill v. Lath* *Lee v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.* *George v. Davoli* *Val-Ford Realty Corp. v. J.Z.’s Toy World, Inc* CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/1044?CON06P | https://www.cali.org/lesson/1044?CON06P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/402/CON06/6035/jq Optional: UCC 2-202 | http://archive.org/embed/ContractsParolEvidRule *** ### Week 4 (14) : December 19 **MIDTERM EXAMINATION** 80 minutes PER continued, gap fillers, implied **terms**, conditions. Casebook *Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. G.W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.* *Trident Center v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/431/CON35/6035/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/421/CON25//jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/422/CON26//jq Optional: *Nanakuli Paving and Rock Co. v. Shell Oil Co.* | https://www.cali.org/lesson/17138?CON28P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16058/CON81/6035/jq *** ### Week 5 (15) : January 9 Review material prior to break, **conditions** continued, express & implied, constructive, precedent, concurrent, subsequent. Casebook *New York Bronze Powder Co. v. Benjamin Acquisition Corp.* *Thos J. Dyer Co. v. Bishop International Engineering Co.* *J.J. Shane, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co.* *Thompson v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Great Falls.* *Stewart v. Newbury* *Monroe Street Properties v. Carpenter* *VRT, Inc. v. Dutton-Lainson* *Walker & Co. v. Harrison* CALI/Other https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16058/CON20/6035/jq | http://archive.org/embed/ContractsConditions Optional: *Audette v. L’Union St. Joseph* | *Inman v. Clyde Hall Drilling Co.* *** ### Week 6 (16) : January 16 Conditions continued, **excuses**, substantial performance, waiver, etc. Casebook *K & G Constr. Co. v. Harris* *Bartus v. Riccardi* *A. B. Parker v. Bell Ford, Inc.* *Emanuel Law Outlines, Inc. v. Multi-State Legal Studies, Inc.* *Scavenger, Inc. v. GT Interactive Software, Inc.* *Locke v. Warner Bros. Inc.* *Swartz v. War Memorial Commission of Rochester* CALI/Other http://archive.org/embed/ContractsSubstantialPerform Optional: *Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent* (and motion for reargument) | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16221/CON08_15/6035/jq *** ### Week 7 (17) : January 23 Excuses continued, **anticipatory repudiation**, satisfy, divisibility. Casebook *Stop & Shop, Inc. v. Ganem* *Market Street Associates Limited Partnership v. Frey* *Wyler Summit Partnership v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.* and *Wyler II* *Burger King Corp v. Family Dining, Inc.* *Western Hills, Oregon, Ltd. v. Pfau* *Indoe v. Dwyer* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/432/CON36/6035/jq Optional: *Cantrell-Waind & Associates, Inc. v. Guillaume Motorsports, Inc* | *Schenectady Steel Co., Inc. v. Bruno Trimpoli General Const. Co., Inc.* | *R&R of Connecticut, Inc. v. Stiegler* | *C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Ins. Co.* *** ### Week 8 (18) : January 30 Anticipatory repudiation continued, **Breach**, material, minor Casebook *Hochster v. De La Tour* *Drake v. Wickwire* *Cohen v. Kranz* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/10780/CON79/6035/jq Optional: https://archive.org/embed/ContractsFeb96 | http://archive.org/embed/ContractsFeb01 *** ### Week 9 (19) : February 6 **Discharge**, impossibility, impracticability, frustration of purpose, etc. Casebook *Paradine v. Jane* *CNA International Reinsurance Co., Ltd. v. Phoenix.* *Clark v. Wallace County Cooperative Equity Exchange.* *Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.* *Transatlantic Financing Corp. v. United States* CALI Optional: *Taylor v. Caldwell* | *Albre Marble and Tile Co., Inc. v. John Bowen Co., Inc.* | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/666/SAL01/6035/jq *** ### Week 10 (20) : February 13 Discharge continued, **novation**, accord and satisfaction, etc. Casebook *Kibler v. Frank L. Garrett & Sons, Inc.* *Feinberg v. Pfeiffer Co.* *First American Commerce Co. v. Washington Mutual Savings Bank* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/835/CON68/6035/jq Optional: https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/397/CON01/6035/jq *** ### Final Exam : February 20 *** ## Spring Quarter Syllabus ### Week 1 (21) : March 5 Review winter quarter final and material, breach continued, **UCC Perfect Tender Rule** Casebook UCC Article 2 Part 6 (pp 835–841 in 6th Ed.) *R&R of Connecticut, Inc. v. Stiegler* *Bartus v. Riccardi* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/10780/CON79/6035/jq Optional: *Burger King Corp v. Family Dining, Inc.* | *C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Ins. Co.* | Barbri outline § VII.(C.) *** ### Week 2 (22) : March 12 Breach continued, review substantial performance, risk of loss, warranty. Casebook *Smith v. Zimbalist* Review: Barbri outline § VII CALI https://www.cali.org/lesson/17138?CON28P | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/9656/CON78/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/743/CON53/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16220/CON08_14/6566/jq Optional: Barbri outline §§ V.(D.2.) and V.(D.5.) | *Bentley v. Slavik* | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/424/CON28/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lesson/17071?CON83P *** ### Week 3 (23) : March 19 **Remedies**, expectation (CFCU), consequential, incidental, liquidated. Casebook *Hawkins v. McGee* Restatement 2d § 344 (p 22 in 6th Ed.) *Hadley v. Baxendale* *Mader v. Stephenson* *Rockingham County v. Luten Bridge Co.* *Kvassay v. Murray* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/732/CON42/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/746/CON56/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/744/CON54/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/747/CON57/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/748/CON58/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/749/CON59/6566/jq Optional: *Sullivan v. O’Connor* | *Protector Insurance Service, Inc. v. USF & G Co.* | *Wassenaar v. Panos* | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16213/CON08_07/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16216/CON08_10/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16214/CON08_08/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16215/CON08_09/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16222/CON08_16/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16218/CON08_12/6566/jq *** ### Week 4 (24) : March 26 Remedies continued, reliance, **equitable**: specific performance, recision, restitution. Casebook *Gruber v. S-M News Co.* *Anglia Television v. Reed* *In Re WorldCom, Inc.* *Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Company* *United States v. Algernon Blair. Blair* *Oliver v. Campbell* *Centex Homes Corp. v. Boag* *Laclede Gas Co. v. Amoco Oil Co.* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/663/REM02/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/742/CON52/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/733/CON43/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/745/CON55/6566/jq Optional: *Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp* | *Jacob & Youngs v. Kent* | *Patton v. Mid-Continent Systems* | Friedman, “The Efficient Breach Fallacy” | *Martin v. Schoenberger* | *Lancellotti v. Thomas* | Alan Schwartz, “The Case for Specific Performance” | *Karpinski v. Ingrasci* | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16219/CON08_13/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16217/CON08_11/6566/jq *** ### Week 5 (25) : April 2 **UCC remedies**, perfect tender, introduction to third party. Casebook *Hessler v. Crystal Lake Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.* *National Controls, Inc. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc* *Horton v. O’Rourke* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/738/CON48/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/740/CON50/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16211/CON08_05/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16209/CON08_03/6566/jq | Optional: https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16212/CON08_06/6566/jq | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/16210/CON08_04/6566/jq *** ### Week 6 (26) : April 9 **MIDTERM EXAMINATION** 80 minutes Third party beneficiaries. Casebook *Lawrence v. Fox* *Seaver v. Ransom* *H.R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.* CALI Optional: *** ### Week 7 (27) : April 16 **Third party beneficiaries** continued, assignment and delegation. Casebook *Lucas v. Hamm* *Erickson v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.* *Detroit Bank and Trust Co. v. Chicago Flame Hardening Co.* *Rouse v. United States* *Herzog v. Irace* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/401/CON05/6566/jq Optional: *Western Waterproofing Co. v. Springfield Housing Authority* | https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/406/CON10/6566/jq | https://youtu.be/X6mA4jYnlAg *** ### Week 8 (28) : April 23 **Assignment and delegation** continued. Casebook *Macke Co. v. Pizza of Gaithersburg, Inc.* *In Re Kaufman* *Seale v. Bates* *Associates Loan Co. v. Walker* CALI https://www.cali.org/lessonlink/825/CON66/6566/jq Optional: *Sally Beauty Co. v. Nexxus Products Co.* | *Western Oil Sales Corp. v. Bliss & Wetherbee* *** ### Week 9 (29) : April 30 Putting it all together, review. Casebook CALI Optional: *** ### Week 10 (30) : May 7 Review for final and FYLSX. Casebook CALI Optional: *** ### Final Examination : May 14 ***