<!-- I prefer the colors of sky theme, but kerning is annoying -->
# PCL 1L Contracts
<!-- .slide: data-background="https://i.imgur.com/ScI1dkF.png" -->
<!--  -->
<!--  -->
[@peoplescollolaw](https://twitter.com/peoplescollolaw)
---
# Part I
## Review
**Consideration**
The bargained-for exchange that imposes a legal detriment on the promisee. Typically in a bilateral contract, both parties are induced by a promise to incur a detriment.
---
Easiest way to answer on an essay is to spell everything out in your analysis:
Party X promised to pay money, a detriment, in exchange for painting, a benefit. Party Y promised to paint, a detriment, for money, a benefit.
Therefore, there's valid consideration.
---
## PMG
**Gifts**
Generally gifts are not valid consideration.
- acts or forbearance
- elements of gift
- need not be economic
---
## Past or Moral
Generally neither are sufficient
- debt exception (revived debt)
- past benefit issue (some courts)
---
## Legal Value
- adequacy
- token
- sham (remember it means it wasn't tendered or intended to be tendered)
- possibility of value
- potential claim is a favorite to test
---
## Detriment and Benefit
Act when under no legal obligation or forbearance when there's a legal right.
---
## **Preexisting Legal Duty**
Where a party has an existing legal duty, a promise to perform or the performance of that duty is ***not consideration***.
### Exceptions
- New or different (Modification)
- Voidable (elective) obligation
- Third party (majority view)
- Honest dispute (compromise)
---
### Exceptions Continued
- Unforeseen Circumstances (Impracticality Discharge)
- UCC Modification
- Existing debts
- undisputed v. disputed
- Forbearance to sue
---
## Modification
An agreement between the parties to modify the terms of an existing contract. At common law modification requires **new** consideration. The UCC only requires good faith.
---
# Part II
## Mutuality
There must be a binding promise by both parties
---
## Requirements and Output revisited
The consideration is the forgoing the right to buy or sell from another party.
---
### Issues
- Conditional promises
- conditioned on satisfaction
- Right to Cancel or Withdraw
- Exclusivity
---
### Issues Continued
- Voidable Promises
- Suretyship
- before or concurrent to promise or performance
- after promise or performance
- alternate courses
---
## Promissory Estoppel
*Detrimental Reliance*
Prevents a party from arguing the existence of a valid contract, where: 1) promisor makes representations inducing reliance; 2) promisee actually and reasonably relies on the representation to their detriment; 3) injustice would otherwise result if not enforced.
---
## Promissory Estoppel
Is considered a substitute for consideration
Typically the party in reliance hasn't promised any consideration
---
[June 2015 Q2](http://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/fyx/June2015_FYSelectedAnswers.pdf)
###### http://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/fyx/June2015_FYSelectedAnswers.pdf
---
# Part III
General formation issues
---
### Our cases this week
*Wiseco, Inc. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.* (222)
*Feinberg v. Pfeiffer Co* (243)
*Conrad v. Fields* (247)
---
:scales: :mortar_board: [@peoplescollolaw](https://twitter.com/peoplescollolaw) :mortar_board: :scales:
---
{"metaMigratedAt":"2023-06-15T14:35:58.313Z","metaMigratedFrom":"YAML","title":"08 Week Contracts Slides","breaks":true,"image":"https://i.imgur.com/PWOPZbH.png","slideOptions":"{\"transition\":\"slide\",\"theme\":\"solarized\"}","contributors":"[{\"id\":\"b818f5aa-75f1-4f0c-b16f-d92bd8ec949c\",\"add\":3632,\"del\":0}]"}