# OpenJS Foundation Standards WG meeting 2020.08.11 **Attendees:** * Eemeli Aro (@eemeli) * Myles Borins (@mborins) * Joe (@joesepi) * Robin Ginn (@rginn) * Donovan Buck (@dtex) * Jory Burson (@jorydotcom) * Mike Samuel (@mikesamuel) * Brian Kardell (@bkardell) * Sendil Kumar (@sendilkumarn) * Ben Michel (@obensource) * Jordan Harband (@ljharb) * Gus Caplan ## Agenda * Congrats Node & Myles, Top-Level Await shipping with 14 & Deno * Deadline to submit [process 2020](https://www.w3.org/2020/06/DRAFT-Process2020.html#changes-2019) changes issues / concerns to W3C for feedback is this week. Doesn't see concerns, if anyone would like to chat about it, let Brian know in slack or via email. * Deadline to submit a WG session for TPAC is this week * Brian - [Update on the open-prioritization project](https://twitter.chttps://www.w3.org/2020/06/DRAFT-Process2020.html#changes-2019om/igalia/status/1293227771049771014) * Robin - is speaking at OSCON this week * Ben - working on blog post for announcing Unicode Consortium relationship, comments requested. * [#102](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/102) * Q: What is the intended activity? * Bringing ideas feels reasonable; is this the appropriate venue for discussion? * We help organize a discussion, facilitate it, etc - but actual detailed technical discussion should not happen here (as this meeting is more about governance & administration). * GC: would be helpful to use this group to advance the discussion on proposals we think would advance the language * EA: so the work is not looking for permission to advance work? just more of an FYI? * GC: not sure! * MB: I think our process is here to help bring in stakeholders, facilitation, etc. in advance of plenary * EA: I think it's different when someone is an 'official' representative vs. when they are a member of a project community with a proposal * JB/GC: Optics around the contribution of a proposal "from a member org" * JB: We can't advance IP under the OpenJS Foundation banner * RG: We have a lot of member companies and projects that may not agree, we have to be extra rigorous * MB/JH: there are some similarities between this issue and issue #84 * MB: if you are a foundation delegate and you are looking to bring a proposal, having some process wherein you raise the proposal and seek feedback among stakeholders. * GC: I feel satisfied with the answers we have come to here. * JB: Are the next steps here clear? * GC: Documenting who has agency would be useful. * [#97](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/pull/97) * this has been open a while - * No objections * Chore Wheel [#101](https://github.com/openjs-foundation/standards/issues/101) * What is the list of chores * Agenda * Chairing * Note-taking * PR review * Try a slack bot? * How often - rotate monthly