---
# System prepended metadata

title: Pluriverse DAO Structure
tags: [Biznass]

---

---
###### tags: `Biznass`
---

# Pluriverse DAO Structure

- Needs for the Pluriverse DAO:
    - **Separate vaults for each flow:**
        - **Sponsorship** (no RQ, streaming to contributors): dedicated to Ops, compensation for contributor work (example: Supermodular funding ops)
        - **Grants** (no RQ, managed by squads): epoch specific funds, basically Pluriverse as a middle entity for distributing value from grant orgs to artists, according to the will of the grant org (example: MetaCartel funding a grant pod)
        - **Commissions** (no RQ, case-by-case): one-off project-specific funds. Excess is fed back into creative projects, but without the overhead that accompanies the grants (example: RAI funding a single comic page for ETH Denver)
        - **Sales** (no RQ, yield farmed for sustainable growth): revenue generated from NFT and physical artifact sales, majority of profits returned to artists, excess is fed back into creative projects (example: sales of art and albums from the MC pod)
        - **Main DAO Treasury** (RQ-able): composed of submitted tribute by curated members, primary equity of the DAO
    - **Experiments in tribute, equity, and ownership:**
        - **Fan Base**: collectors pay tribute by submitting NFTs they acquired through various drops. Receive loot shares(?), unlocking access to Snapshot, token gated access to Discord, and other social perks.
        - **Contributors**: can receive part of their compensation in DAO member shares, providing equity, ownership, on-chain governance.
        - **Artists**: given honorary member shares with their grant to encourage participation. Equity opportunities like contributors, but a different class of contribution. Certainly a different economic flow, since they can bring income to the DAO. Need to consider this.
        - **Investors**: Can purchase member shares, but are limited in their voting permissions to avoid capture. (How to technically do this?) Do they need to be DAO members at all? Nice to ensure accountability, but potentially creates instability (opens up to rugging).
    - **Limited legal liability protections for the contributors**
        - Mint a Wrappr/Kali LLC NFT... is that enough?
        - Initiate moves towards all the content being collectively owned, as an argument towards collective anonymity of content creators. Leading to...
    - **Pluriverse DAO as a publishing entity:**
        - **Poster publication**: carry forward extreme experiments in pushing the limits of Jord's DAO publication ideas.
        - **Mirror publication/integration**: the DAO collectively (anonymously) publishes content that could be generated from any/all its contributors, according to the NFT flow outlined above. The DAO holds the IP rights to the content? Synced with the Poster content?
        - **Living Manifesto**: published on-chain, open source repos, signature protocol, written/ratified/maintained by the community, [building off of the Verses community](https://pluriverse.world/)

- First pass on illustrating the architecture:

![](https://i.imgur.com/PMhLJbS.jpg)
![](https://i.imgur.com/FgqzQAX.jpg)

- Obviously should be a Moloch v3
    - How much can be used out of the box, how much needs to be customized? Need to scope/spec with DAOstillery crew
    - Can a deal be struck to exchange value between parties?
        - Document the design/build, publish as a case study
        - Pluriverse provides marketing materials in exchange for a custom DAO build. Both parties document and publish their findings on their own channels.

---

