# DAO DAO ❤️ Juno

## Problems
1) Juno has too much voting power on daodao in this early stage of the project. DAO DAO team would like to have the freedom of developing the project in the way they find most ideal without having to always discuss with every share holder risking to not be able to operate in an efficient way
2) DAO DAO can't risk to fuck up $DAO tokenomic with too-early listing or airdrops
3) The deal DAO DAO made with juno could harm other future deals

## Solutions
1) Transform $DAO vesting to $nDAO vesting, which has a longer unlock period for voting on proposals
2) Disable transfers?
3) Better explain the total value DAO DAO received from Juno, not only in terms of money but also as innovation in governance, experimental place, insane amount of feedbacks and support. Juno invested most of its resources on daodao, both economically and shaping it's own governance system around it leading the innovation in this field and it will keep doing so

## Resources
- DAO DAO blog post https://noahdaodao.substack.com/p/why-did-dao-dao-propose-to-end-the