---
# System prepended metadata

title: '#02 Ocean Academy - Meeting Notes (10.02.21)'
tags: [Meeting, Oyster, Shrimp]

---

#02 Ocean Academy - Meeting Notes (10.02.21) 
===

###### tags: `Meeting` `Shrimp` `Oyster`
###### participants: Frederic S, Kai M, Laurent R, Nuno L, Gherardo L, Albert P, Ludovic G

:::info
#02 Ocean Academy Meeting
10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CET
meet.google.com/msd-phxj-ihr
:::

## Objectives
- Review Shrimp launch
- Prepare Oyster development 

## Agenda
- What did we deliever?
- How to communicate Shrimp?
- What is missing for Shrimp?
- Who will work on Project Oyster?
- Process improvements


## Notes

#### Next Steps
- Prepare Trello board for Oyster Development
- Write scripts to quickly get numbers for the ocean Academy (new signups, completition, etc)
- Define workflow for bug fixes
- Consider CI/CD and a dedicated test system for development
- Create a review plan for the Shrimp release
- Allocation of the rewards was postponed by a week to take in account the Shrimp review
- We will ask the community in Discord/Twitter if we should deploy the NFT contract or activate our Rinkeby implementation for now

#### Learnings from Project Shrimp
- Underestimated the work for content, development and coordination/management
- We worked together for the first time
- We had not full controll of the infrastructure (no quick access)
- We had to fix bugs in production (we need a test system)
- Communication with the comunity was non-existent (we need a dedicated communication strategy)
- Content review should happen way erlier and by dedicated contributors
- Actions should be formalized as Trello cards and Telegram should be used to link discussions to those actions not to introduce new ones
- Processes (feedback/review, content creation, development) should be further defined and standardized to align expectations