# Web Search and Evaluation
## Google Search
### Learn to refine your Google search – Google’s Advanced Search can also be handy.
What would you query to see how many pages on the English Wikipedia site contain the exact phrase “Northeastern University”? How many results did you get?
* I query 'Northeastern University - site:en.wikipedia.org'
* I got about 107,000,000 results in 0.48 seconds
What would you query to see web pages about the skate fish without mention of the phrase “ice rink”? (Hint: It can still mention “ice” or “rink” but not “ice rink.”)
* Go to the "All These Words" query in Google's Advanced Search and enter "Skate Fish" and in the "None of These Words" query enter the term "Ice Rink".
* Another option is to perform a search for 'Skate Fish - "Ice Rink"'
What would you query to see web pages about the Northeastern Huskies from the first day of 2001 through the last day of 2002?
* Type 'Northeastern Huskies' in the search bar and then go to the Tools section custome time range from Jan 1st 2002 to December 31st 2002.
### Find me the top image of the exact phrase “penguin pair” with a “Creative Commons” usage right.

## Web credibility
Find a web page of questionable credibility and apply some of the criteria discussed by Valenza and Berkley Library.
* https://www.wionews.com/world/ghost-of-kyiv-killed-in-fighting-after-shooting-down-40-russian-jets-475309
* It is a fallacy that there is no such thing as the Ghost of Kiev -> using fake and exagerate headline to draw engagement
* Over 1.6 million people have watched the viral clip showing the Ghost of Kyiv shooting down a Russian aircraft on Twitter. However in fact this video is really from a 2008 simulator video game.
## Wikipedia evaluation
A version of the “Joseph Reagle” Wikipedia article stated (a) I worked at the World Wide Web Consortium and (b) my book Good Faith Collaboration was “bestselling.” How does these claims relate to the policy of Wikipedia:Verifiability? Would you suggest any changes to the page?
* (a) This claim is related and true to the Wikipedia’s reliability claims. Considering that it is cited on the Wikipedia page and the w3c webpage itself.
* (b) Because the claims have been made without any precise sales data or breadth distribution that would show the reliability of being a "best seller," the validity of this claim may be called into doubt. I would suggest adding link or data to support this claim.
According to its history, when was this page first created (i.e., the oldest version)?
* August 1st 2011