# Fingerprints Organizational Design 3.0

# Context

This proposal updates Fingerprints organizational design, simplifying its structure through the introduction of the Working Group Framework.

Working Groups will become the basic unit for organizing and dividing work within the DAO, to be proposed directly by Fingerprints members.

The new model aims to achieve the following effects:

- grant more freedom and flexibility for working members to self-organize;
- improve the competitiveness of Fingerprints when seeking to attract and retain talent;
- reduce the frequency of DAO-wide voting for daily expenses and other work-related affairs;
- allow for easier and tailored tinkering of the DAOs working groups;
- introduce a simpler, more decentralized and more flexible organizational design.

# Proposal

### Working Group Framework

1. **Working groups** are the basic units of contributors and resources with shared objectives and responsibilities;
1. working groups must be proposed by Fingerprints members following a standardized **formation proposal template**;
2. working groups must have clear activities, responsibilities, KPIs, and budget requirements to be specified in its formation proposal;
1. these attributions must be high-level and open-ended to allow for flexibility within the working group.
3. working groups are free to self-organize, having full discretion over compensation schemes, hierarchies and budget allocations;
4. working group formation proposals must be approved via Snapshot with a quorum of at least **50%** of the outstanding supply of $PRINTS;
2. Each working group must elect a **facilitator** to be its main governance representative, responsible for facilitating the interface with the rest of the DAO;
1. facilitators don't hold any special power by default, although it might be granted in the formation proposal.
3. Working groups will have a feedback period of **6 months**, after which their performance must be reviewed and their continuation approved or rejected by the DAO;
1. occasional performance reviews and standardized reporting are expected by each working group to the rest of the DAO.

### Budgeting and Reporting

Given the high level of freedom enjoyed by working groups, the following budgeting and reporting duties are required to maintain transparency and control over the DAOs operations:

1. Each working group’s facilitator will be responsible for reporting requirements;
2. Working groups must provide the following standardized reports at the end of every month:
1.