Complaint Againts AG Bondi

<div style="border: 3px dashed #1e90ff; padding: 18px; border-radius: 10px; background: #f8fbff;"> <h2 style="margin-top:0;">📌 Submission Instructions and Link</h2> <ul style="line-height:1.6;"> <li><strong>Please Note:</strong> This document is a formal complaint drafted for your use. The DOJ OIG accepts submissions <strong>online</strong> or <strong>via mail</strong>.</li> <li><strong>Review and Edit:</strong> Replace all bracketed placeholder text (e.g., <code>$$Your Name$$</code>) and confirm the date is current before submission.</li> <li><strong>Copy and Paste:</strong> Copy the text starting from the date and address below and paste it into the online form’s primary text/summary section.</li> <li><strong>Online Submission Link:</strong> <a href="https://oig.justice.gov/pages/submitting-a-complaint" target="_blank">https://oig.justice.gov/pages/submitting-a-complaint</a></li> </ul> </div> ---  **November 14, 2025** **Office of the Inspector General** U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear OIG representative/s. This complaint formally requests a federal review for Abuse of Authority, Obstruction Under Color of Law, and Failure of Official Duty by former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, given that her alleged professional misconduct severely undermined federal interests in child protection and eroded public confidence in impartial justice. As a concerned U.S. citizen, I submit this complaint exercising my civic duty to uphold the integrity of our governing institutions. I believe a fair society requires that every individual has the opportunity to receive fair due process, ensured by impartial professional diligence from public officials. The conduct described herein represents a fundamental breach of this foundational principle. The matter concerns the failure to act promptly on evidence involving allegations of misconduct against a politically connected individual, despite substantial public documentation, media reporting, and widely circulated photographic evidence. This is not speculation; it is the observable failure of a state official to execute duties with the diligence and neutrality required by the Constitution, her own Professional Guidelines, and by federal expectations for the protection of minors. I understand you are not the bar association to sanction or disbar her, but because she owes a duty to all Americans, I would like to execute my civic duty as I see fit, to help correct this fiasco swiftly. --- ## I. Delayed Action Constituted Willful Misconduct Under Color of Law When an official has access to material evidence involving sexual abuse of minors, and delays or declines to act with reasonable diligence and without reasonable justification, such delay risks constituting a knowing violation of legal duty. The administrative failure itself warrants review for professional misconduct based on: - **Obstruction of Justice (implying a willful act)** - **Abuse of Power and Discretion (demonstrating bad faith)** - **Dereliction of Duty (constituting deliberate indifference to a known risk)** - **Selective Enforcement of the Law (favoring a political interest over a clearly established statutory duty)** - **Failure to protect victims** --- ## II. Breach of Duty Exposed Federal Interests to Liability The failure of state officials to act diligently on evidence involving the sexual abuse of minors creates immediate and serious risks. Such inaction by an Attorney General, whose duties are ministerial in protecting the public from violations of clearly established federal child-protection laws, is not merely a mistake; it is a profound dereliction that exposes the U.S. Republic to liability. Risks created by these delays include: - Victims may pursue federal civil actions against the state. - Victims may allege that delayed disclosure caused prolonged harm. - Most critically, such inaction fundamentally undermines Federal enforcement of child-protection laws and severely breaches the public trust in judicial institutions dedicated to protecting vulnerable minors. Federal statutes concerning minors are unambiguous and constitute clearly established law that a reasonable official would have known, placing the duty to act beyond debate: - **18 U.S.C. § 2251** – Sexual exploitation of children - **18 U.S.C. § 2422** – Coercion and enticement - **18 U.S.C. § 2423** – Transportation of minors - **18 U.S.C. § 1591** – Sex trafficking of children Delays in acknowledging, evaluating, or forwarding relevant evidence — particularly where minors may be involved — raise serious questions about whether Bondi upheld the duties of her office. --- ## III. Public Office Duties Do Not Include Protecting Individuals from Accountability An Attorney General’s responsibility is to: - Protect the public - Maintain integrity in the justice system - Ensure timely evaluation of evidence - Act without favoritism or political influence The duty does not include insulating powerful individuals from accountability or delaying justice in a manner that harms victims. If the official determined that impartiality was impossible, ethical guidelines demanded prompt resignation. Choosing instead to remain in office while demonstrably failing to take required action constitutes a knowing breach of public trust and is a clear matter deserving of immediate federal review. --- ## IV. Request for Formal Investigation Accordingly, I respectfully request that the DOJ OIG evaluate whether: 1. Material evidence was improperly withheld or deliberately delayed by AG Pam Bondi, constituting obstruction. 2. Political considerations influenced official decisions, which cannot undermine the vyctims ritghs to justice. 3. Victims’ rights were compromised by inaction. 4. Federal interests in enforcing child-protection laws were undermined. 5. Administrative misconduct or obstruction under color of law occurred. The conduct requiring investigation is one far beyond simple negligence or official incompetence; it is classified herein as willful misconduct and deliberate indifference to a clear statutory duty to protect minors. Such a failure to act on substantial, publicly available evidence falls outside the scope of any reasonable official discretion and cannot be protected by principles intended to shield "all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law" (*Malley v. Briggs*, 475 U.S. 335, 341 (1986)). This request is made to uphold justice, constitutional integrity, and the protection of minors from sexual abuse. No individual, regardless of political or social position, should benefit from selective protection by a public official. Thank you for your attention. I am willing to provide further clarification if needed. Sincerely, <div style="margin-top:30px; text-align:left; line-height:1.4; font-family: 'Segoe Script', cursive, sans-serif; font-size:22px; color:#1e1e1e;"> <p>Sincerely,</p> <p style="font-weight:normal; font-style:italic;"> >>Your Name here<< <br> >>Address << <br> >> City and State<< </p> </div>