---
# System prepended metadata

title: Polls - Accessibility in Vis

---

# Polls - Accessibility in Vis

1. What makes a bad visualisation?

* colors too similar
* fonts too small
* too much information per square cm :D
* hard to figure out relationship between nodes
* too much information
* information that is not comparable 
* not accessible for colorblind
* ....

2. Which colour combination do you think is best? add a '+' next to your answer

* Orange/purple:
* Purple/yellow: ++
* Blue/red: +++
* Green/orange:

3. Opinions on use of pattens/labelling/separations?

* Aren't there predefined palettes that are supposed to be tested?
* ....
* .....
* .....
* ....
* ....

4. Anything else for static content?

* ...
* ....
* .....
* .....
* ....
* ....

5. What do you think that we should consider for accessibility in interactive plots?

* ...
* ....
* .....
* .....
* ....
* ....

6. Thoughts on whether we should implement all accessibility options?

* Implement the easy options, no excuse not to.
* I think we should have some kind of checklist. Or refer to one on the net.
* Do as much as we can, that's already a big step forward. We can do an accessibility review every year, sounds doable.
* If stuff remains, such as plots, then consider writing a brief description
* as much as we can 
* If plots are too messy for impaired users, then they are also bad for others. So redesign.
* Yes I think we should implement some of these, and then evaluate these. Easy upgrades.
* We should think about this for the wastewater plots first as a case, they are probably the most accessed by the general public.
* Has to be done incrementally. Continuous improvement.

