# Polls - Accessibility in Vis 1. What makes a bad visualisation? * colors too similar * fonts too small * too much information per square cm :D * hard to figure out relationship between nodes * too much information * information that is not comparable * not accessible for colorblind * .... 2. Which colour combination do you think is best? add a '+' next to your answer * Orange/purple: * Purple/yellow: ++ * Blue/red: +++ * Green/orange: 3. Opinions on use of pattens/labelling/separations? * Aren't there predefined palettes that are supposed to be tested? * .... * ..... * ..... * .... * .... 4. Anything else for static content? * ... * .... * ..... * ..... * .... * .... 5. What do you think that we should consider for accessibility in interactive plots? * ... * .... * ..... * ..... * .... * .... 6. Thoughts on whether we should implement all accessibility options? * Implement the easy options, no excuse not to. * I think we should have some kind of checklist. Or refer to one on the net. * Do as much as we can, that's already a big step forward. We can do an accessibility review every year, sounds doable. * If stuff remains, such as plots, then consider writing a brief description * as much as we can * If plots are too messy for impaired users, then they are also bad for others. So redesign. * Yes I think we should implement some of these, and then evaluate these. Easy upgrades. * We should think about this for the wastewater plots first as a case, they are probably the most accessed by the general public. * Has to be done incrementally. Continuous improvement.