## Google Search

### What would you query to see how many pages on the English Wikipedia site mention 'Northeastern University'? How many results did you get?

I searched "Northeastern University" site:wikipedia.org and set the results to English pages only, the results from this search can be seen through [this link](https://www.google.com/search?as_q=&as_epq=Northeastern+University&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=lang_en&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=wikipedia.org&as_occt=any&safe=images&as_filetype=&as_rights=). There were about 6,390 results given.

### What would you query to see Web pages about the skate fish but no pages about an 'ice rink'?

I would search "skate fish" -ice -rink, the results can be seen by following [this link](https://www.google.com/search?as_q=&as_epq=skate+fish&as_oq=&as_eq=ice+rink&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&as_filetype=&as_rights=)

### What would you query to see Web pages about the Northeastern Huskies from the first day of 2001 through the last day of 2002?

I put Northeastern Huskies in quotation marks, then used the 'tools' button on the Google Search to narrow down the time, [this link](https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Northeastern+Huskies%22&lr=&as_qdr=all&sxsrf=ACYBGNS3mCOcIvhll0jlOquqjYEZ-18iGQ%3A1579563292209&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2001%2Ccd_max%3A12%2F31%2F2002&tbm=) shows what the results look like.

### The top image of a pair of penguins with a free to use, share or modify, even commercially license.

The results from this search can be found [here](https://www.google.com/search?as_st=y&tbm=isch&as_q=&as_epq=pair+of+penguins&as_oq=&as_eq=&cr=&as_sitesearch=&safe=images&tbs=sur:fmc#imgrc=_)

## Web Credibility

### Find a webpage of questionable credibility and apply some of the criteria discussed by Valenza and Northern Michigan University.

[This](https://www.rowling.info/) webpage I found, in my opinion, fits the criteria of questionable credibility. It is a webpage about JK Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter book series. I found it on page two of Google when I searched for 'JK Rowling website'.

The reading that best fits this webpage is that from Northern Michigan University. The reason for this is because the criteria that they list raises concerns about the webpage I have found. The other reading by Valenza is more about identifying fake news and biases within social media and other news sources. I don't think that is relevant to this webpage about JK Rowling.

This webpage raises concerns in four out of the six criteria given by Northern Michigan University for evaluating internet sources. The first one is authority. It is not clear who is responsible for the contents of the webpage, therefore, there is no way to verify whether this person, organization, group or company is legitimate or not. This poses issues when using this webpage as a source for information because we don't know who the author is and what authority they have to be giving information about JK Rowling.

The second criteria is accuracy. There are no sources clearly listed to verify the information that is on the page. Similar to authority, accuracy evaluates whether the points addressed on the page are factual or not. And the way to make points factual is through referencing.

The next criteria is currency. There is no date to be found on the page to indicate when it was created or last updated. Although, almost any reader could gather that it is incredibly out of date as the last item listed under 'Books by JK Rowling' is Harry Potter and the Order of the Pheonix which was published in 2003.

Lastly, is the criteria of appearance. The first three links listed at the bottom of the page are links to official pages of the Harry Potter franchise, however, the last three links are either outdated, questionably credible, or not working.

Overall, I would not recommend this webpage for anyone to use as a reliable source of information.

## Wikipedia Evaluation

### How do the claims that Joseph Reagle worked at the World Wide Web Consortium and that his book Good Faith Collaboration was bestselling relate to the policy of Wikipedia:Verifiability? And what changes would you suggest for the page?

The claims that Professor Reagle worked at the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) are valid because of the source that was cited along with this information. The source used was the personal webpage of the Professor himself, stating that he had in fact worked at the W3C. This claim is supported by Wikipedia's verifiability policy because it has come directly from the source of the person of whom this article is about.
I couldn't find any comments about the bestseller book, perhaps, that was in a previous version. I'm also unsure what changes I would suggest for the page, but I am interested in seeing what other students have come up with. Their ideas will, hopefully, help me come up with some of my own.

### According to its history, when was this article first created?

In 2011, on the 1st of August.