---
# System prepended metadata

title: papad demo slides - notes and feedback

---

# papad demo slides - notes and feedback

https://slides.com/voidspacexyz/oral-archive-story-telling/

>1st draft presentation. Need inputs on the many slides






Media fragment annotator

to facilitate

inclusive hyper-media archives

in

the decentralized web

for

storytelling needs


1. media fragments
    1.1 media meta data (date, time, place, provenance, privacy and rights), descriptions, tags, authors, editors, ..
    1.2 portions of media (audio/video) start-time to end-time 
2. annotations and web annotations
    2.1 any web document can be annotated (ref: W3C Web Annotation Model)
    2.2 annotation is a <target - relation - body> triple
    2.3 target of annotation can be whole "url", fragment of a media, part of a web page
    2.3 body of annotation can be text, tags, other media (audio/video)
3. inclusive
    3.1 annotations can be done by 3rd parties! (you do not need to the author or an assigned editor). A person perusing the document can do an annotation
    3.2 For us: A low-literate person can upload media, an (assigned) editor can help with meta data including autor identification
    3.3 A listener/viewer can identify fragments of interest and contribute an annotation for that fragment (ie., the target)
    3.4 Annotation bodies can include images, text, tags, audio, map locations, supporting provence data
    3.5 all body data will be used for filtering and indexing; also for special interest groups can curate annotations or add SIG tags
    3.6 this was of inclusion leads to self organised systems where "knowledge" is not defined by any specific (institutionalised) body or group 
4. hype-media archives
    4.1 hyper-text (html/http) enabled teh Web as we know it now.
    4.2 what about media content (the fastest growing - think of ig reels or tictok)? - how can they have hyper links
    4.3 hype-media manifests as a searchable, navigable and discoverable media collection
    4.4 archive is a collection of media governed by collector domains of interest
    4.5 each domain can have their own schema that influences archival workflows and its representation in the larger world
5. decentralized web
    5.1 Can we survive and internet shutdown
    5.2 Do we need to (pay and) subscribe to various ISPs so our (rural and local) community can contribute content, suggest hyper-links (annotate), create stories
    5.3 what about when an archive or a media moves from one archive to another - is 404 the future of us too.
    5.4 Is dWeb a thing?
6. community networks
    6.1 We need a park bench, a "water fountain", community center, women signing together on their fields, identification of bio-diversity or sharing new recipes (and food)
    6.2 Social media today is providing much of the above but only to connect from with in a community to some one outside (often anonymous) - certainly not your neighbor
    6.3 imagine an internet technology online-space that is internet independent!
    6.4 what is the hardware, who are the owners, where is the gateway, what about domain names
    6.5 secure servers and who defines services
    6.6 now think of hyper-media archives as a service

7. traditional story tellers
    7.1 images (art), nomadic (maps), contextual (know who is listening)
    7.2 part of a significant economy of the land - cultural economy was supposed to be 30% of the total
    7.3 athithi devo bhava - an uninvited guest is a devine interruption (they bring new information which is the nurishment for the brain, as food is for the body)
    7.4 whose stories is chatGPT imbiding! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-fk06FMBVg vs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhNnyQOY1tA (distributed AI where you have your "own AI system for starters" :)

---
8. memory and renarrations
9. dynamic recontexualizations
10. inclusive of low-literate community, women, alternate stories, intreperters, meta data enhancers, internet-independent communities