---
# System prepended metadata

title: Lazy Roadmap
tags: [R4MP]

---

###### tags: `R4MP`

# Lazy Roadmap

## Bugs

- [Maptip Limitations](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/discussions/931); given its continuted to marinate and we're due for another ESRI API release in summer, might be advantage to keep marinating as it's always possible they just fix it then we win.
  - Related: [Maptips on Highlights](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/discussions/1320)
- [Broken External Fixtures](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/issues/692); not a showstopper

## Priority Features

- [External Div Support](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/discussions/1497); sounds like Danbo wants to leverage for a project
- [Merge Grid](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/discussions/1646); same

## Non Priority Initiatives

- Storylines with RAMP4; will double benefit as a good testing suite (lots of different services and scenarios), and also help push the knife into RAMP2's corrupt heart. Will certainly generate new priority tasks & features.
- Automated tests; lots of placeholder issues under the `flavour: tests` label, but likely needs fresh R&D and cohesive battle plan for a proper start
- Testing in General
  - Leveraging QA Group (trick them into doing lots of work)
  - Better sample selection; most of our test pages tend to be copy & paste of same config, so always testing against same 3 services

## General Improvements

- Proper doc site; [Issue](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/issues/170), [Issue](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/issues/367), [Discussion](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/discussions/427)
- Public facing & updated RAMP "Advertising" site
- [Build Size](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/discussions/985); not a show stopper, but our hot claims of "R4 is faster" seem lame when if I time the 2, RAMP2 at least gives the appearance of being about a second faster. Good issue to dump on Miles.
- Support for React / SPA stuff
  - Likely needs a team discussion to see if we should care. Doesn't fit our usual projects, but as an open source lib, we may want to support common scenarios in other pages
  - [Issue](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/issues/1599), [Issue](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/issues/1598), [Issue](https://github.com/ramp4-pcar4/ramp4-pcar4/issues/1595)
