# Spacebox proposal from Bro_n_Bro to Bostrom ## Introduction Data indexation remains a critical challenge across the entire Cosmos ecosystem, and the Bostrom network is no exception. We present a transformative solution that promises to empower Bostrom's analytics teams, data scientists, and app developers. The Spacebox network indexation tool represents a significant advancement in data accessibility. While we recognize that indexers are not a panacea for network ecosystem development, we firmly believe that Spacebox has the potential to catalyze growth in the immediate term. ## Project Scope Thanks to the groundwork laid by proposal [#155](https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/155), including default modules, IBC, and Liquidity, we have a functional Index prototype. Our proposal outlines the expansion of this prototype, integrating Bostrom's bespoke modules: - bandwidth - dmn - graph - grid - rank - resources We'll provide related to that modules tables like history tables and state tables for quick data access. This strategic approach ensures swift and efficient data retrieval, empowering developers and users with actionable insights. For a sense of where we stand in terms of progress, we encourage you to follow our work at this [repo](https://github.com/bro-n-bro/spacebox-crawler). ## Funding Amount - 1.5T $BOOT ## Why Support Spacebox proposal We're not simply looking for your vote, we're inviting you to join us in a collaborative effort that aims to transform Bostrom's path. The world of blockchain is constantly changing, and the ability to adjust is crucial. Spacebox, equipped with its advanced indexing capabilities, embodies the flexibility necessary for success in this dynamic and ever-changing space. ## Voting - **YES** - by voting ‘Yes’ on this proposal, you indicate support for funding the Spacebox development for Bostrom proposal from the community pool. - **NO** - by voting ‘No’ on this proposal, you do not support this proposal and do not wish Spacebox Index to include Bostrom's dedicated modules. - **NO WITH VETO** - You consider this proposal (1) to be spam, i.e., irrelevant to Cosmos Hub, (2) disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or (3) violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently set out by Cosmos Hub governance. If the number of ‘NoWithVeto’ votes is greater than a third of total votes, the proposal is rejected and the deposits are burned. - **ABSTAIN** - You wish to contribute to quorum but you formally decline to vote either for or against the proposal.