# Solid Editorial Session January 4th, 2021 https://meet.jit.si/solid-specification ## Present - Justin B - Sarven C - Ruben V - Dmitri Z - TimBL ## Agenda - Recap of activity since last session - SC: Justin, can we make solidproject.org/TR/ available soon? Otherwise, I'll have apply for Admin ;) - https://solid.github.io/specification/protocol - Goals and milestones for 2021 - https://solid.github.io/specification/#work-items - proposed (Sarven) - Editors of sub-specs (e.g. Solid-OIDC) - Solid Process/vocab management: https://github.com/solid/process/pull/247 (Tim to review) - SC: Tim, please review soonish? :) I have a follow-up PR for solid/vocab - Check/reminder about the websockets spec - Question if it makes sense to resurrect https://github.com/solid/identity-panel/issues/1 in the /specification repo - SC: Dmitri, quick feedback: can we get some uptake (implementation) in the community before raising its profile - DZ: Yep, sounds good. I think my main question is - is there any interest or objection within this team. - SC: No objection.. but need to understand how it fits with Solid-OIDC etc.. did-web - CORS proxy (Tim brought this up) ## Minutes - JB: Action item: Delete and resend meeting series with jitsi link - SC: update protocol: - abstract (why, what's core) - add conformance (exit) criteria - add current state of websocket req - TBL: Websocket is part of the spec - SC: Prefer not to refer back to prior documents - JB: Can we mention or point to the in-flight websocket work in the meantime and mention that it is happening but not ready - TBL: Provide more detail on patching (generally), and on the details of patching via websocket (add as goal) - TBL: Reasonable to put in a placeholder for ACP / Authorization Use Cases as additional work in progress - SC: Concerned about pointing to ACP ahead of use cases and requirements - JB: Propose linking to authorization requirements / use cases at a minimum - SC: wait until agreed solution is available before including in Protocol - JB: Action Item to get specs under solidproject.org/TR - JB: Can we use something like solid:pod instead of pim:storage? Timbl - reasonable question - SC: create internationalization issue for solid/terms, pim/space..