---
# System prepended metadata

title: 'DECENTRALIZED CLIMATE FOUNDATION: THE DAO PROPOSAL'

---

# DECENTRALIZED CLIMATE FOUNDATION: THE DAO PROPOSAL

## LICENSE

```
Copyright (C)  DECENTRALIZED CLIMATE FOUNDATION A.C.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU
Free Documentation License". 
```

## The Traditional organizations issues
1. There can be a conflcit of interest when the Task Asigner or Payer persons have preferences over workers
2. When we use hour rate, people add extra hours to simple work ( 1 dolar per minut in call )
3. When people get paid to be in office, example 4 hours, its rated by ours but not in efficiency (we call it ass hour).
4. Free work asignation (when someone asigns to themselfs) can be just to fill task on unecesary or useless work.

## The Proposal
1. We do tasks with amounts to be paid for completion.
1.1 There is a monthly cap while we are in crisis, we also divide the tasks so that no one lacks, and always have extra tasks.
2. To assign a task, it has to be voted or approved by more than two persons and at least two areas.
3. We make 1-hour calls on the weekend to assign and verify tasks (scrum) and 15-minute calls are recommended between people who collaborate by team, if there is more than one person in a specific task (each one writes the task and the amount is divided)
4. Payments and Quality of work: While we operate on the testnet, payments will be display at the end of the month, We define and vote a quality grade of the delivery, in some proposed percentages lower or upper from the price proposed on the task.Note: we want to incentivice team work which help to have quality, creativity and reduce errors, so this might be considered as well.
5. External Collaborators and Community: can do tasks with bounty promise (in the airdrop), NFTs, or anyone has extraordinary performance. (but we cannot ensure the price for this airdrops or NFTs since this can be considered speculation)
6. Fundamental external workers and services should be voted and notified by the DAO to show DCF transparency of expenses: Like Lawyers, acountants, office cleaning and other services.  
7. Any work that is not a priority nor approved by the DAO at point 6 (basic external) to forefill DECA and DCF development projects and that the current team is not qualified to perform, should be done either by comunity memebers or by a fiverr/bounty system to hire someone (example: Marketing, external writers and other services)

## How To Vote and scenarios membership DAO
The memebership DAO is where there is a non transferable token, 1 person 1 vote: Considering there are 4 persons (and will be 5 for the foundation) 

![](https://i.imgur.com/H9VEMh2.png)

> Support: Support is the relative percentage of tokens that are required to vote “Yes” for a proposal to be approved. For example, if “Support” is set to 50%, then more than 50% of the tokens used to vote on a proposal must vote “Yes” for it to pass.

> Minimum Approval is the percentage of the total token supply that is required to vote “Yes” on a proposal before it can be approved. For example, if the “Minimum Approval” is set to 20%, then more than 20% of the outstanding token supply must vote “Yes” on a proposal for it to pass.
> Note: Requires at least 2 persons to be approved

> Vote Duration is the length of time that the vote will be open for participation. For example, if the Vote Duration is set to 24 hours, then token holders have 24 hours to participate in the vote. 


### There are multiple scenarios:
And this apply also to 5 persons (as required for 2023) 

1. Only one person votes **YES**:
    Result: The proposal gets **rejected**
2. Two persons votes **YES**:
    Result: It gets **approved**
3. Two persons votes **YES** and one votes **NO**:
    Result: The transaction gets **approved**
4. Two persons votes **YES** and two Persones votes **NO** 
    Result: it will be **rejected**
    
## ToDo
- [x] Multiple scenarios section
    - [x] Create voting system for 5 members
    - [x] Must comply with 4 members
    - [ ] vote 5th member 
    - [ ] Vote 2: ACL: Grants “Voting” the ability to perform actions of role “Modify quorum” on “Voting” How To and issues found report (fixed by console)
- [ ] Add License
- [ ] DCF DAO Improvement Proposals
- [x] Add References
    - [x] Link to the DCF DAO 2022 (Goerli TestNet)
    - [x] Add Aragon references  
    - [x] Goerli testnet faucet  
- [ ] Sync setup with foundation's Github/Gitlab
    - [ ] Version control
    - [ ] Work with issues and forks not only by hackmd.
    - [ ] Decentralize in any possible ways (maybe a web3 on jekyl + feek + gitcoin)
 
## References
\[1\] DCF DAO 2022, "DCF DAO", https://client.aragon.org/#/dcf/, 2022.
\[2\] The Aragon community builders, "Aragon HowTo", https://aragon.org/how-to, 2022.
\[2\] Faucet Goerli, "Faucet to mine testnet coins(fees)", https://goerli-faucet.pk910.de/, 2022.
