--- tags: Snippets --- # G&R #164 Snippet This `snippet` includes Governance, MIPs, forum updates, and Core Unit team discussions from the MakerDAO Governance and Risk Call #164. ## General Updates ### Votes *Executive:* - October 8th: Offboarding Vaults, MKR Vesting, and Core Unit Budget Distribution - Passed & Executed - There will NOT be an executive proposal up for vote tomorrow. - Only one polled item ready for action - Much of Exec team traveling to Lisbon *Polls:* - 4 Weekly Polls Passed - Add stETH (Lido Staked ETH) as a new Vault Type - Nexo Institutional Vault Onboarding - Add the Aave Direct Deposit DAI Module (D3M) - Increase the GUNIV3DAIUSDC1-A Debt Ceiling - 1 Weekly Poll was Rejected - PaperImperium Supplemental Compensation - 6 Ratification Polls ongoing (end October 25) - 1 Greenlight Polls active (voting ends Mon. Oct. 18th) - [CurveLP-stETH-ETH (Curve stETH-ETH LP Token)](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/Qmd1qpHU?network=mainnet#poll-detail) ### MIPs [Weekly MIPs Update #58](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/weekly-mips-update-58/11074) ![](https://i.imgur.com/LWnsZJh.png) - Ratification Polls for October’s Governance Cycle are now running their second week. ### Forum at a Glance [Forum at a Glance: October 14th - October 21st](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/forum-at-a-glance-october-14th-october-21st/11135) ## Team-led Discussions ### Delegate Compensation #### LongForWisdom - Delegates put in many hours of work and high effort, which should be fairly compensated. #### Rune Christensen - Delegates workforce, empowered with resources. Disconnect MKR holders and CoreUnits, particularly budgets. - Difference between voters and a professional full time delegate. - Need to find balance between an attractice cash compensation but also MKR compensation. - Unhappy delegates not sustainable. Need to approach more professional and qualified Delegates from outside. - Need to move forward with this situation through step by step measures besides just signals. - Need to create a clear list of qualifications, KPIs, and "job" description for Delegates, it is an elective position. - Contrary opinion: Since community picks their Delegates, qualifications for Delegates will naturally be selected and weeded out by MKR lenders and community voters. - Responsibilities should be documented for Delegate rolls because the Delegate roll is not properly defined. - Delegation could be an idea for a Governance outreach Core Unit. - We may need to give Delegates a chance to find out what exactly their job is. - This is a very unique situation that we cannot predict. - Need to allow some time of exploration to help develop the overview of a Delegate role. - Contrary opinion: this could become a huge mess that will be difficult to fix later. We need to clarify the basic responsibilities right now; what, when, why. - There's uncertainty in the level of legal risk associated for Delegates. - Rune believes we are too focused on external issues and need to revert back to the core of MakerDAO and delegation. - We need to spend more time to discuss value in the DAO and delegation in general before we focus on Delegate responsibilities. - Thereafter, we can begin to layer additional responsibilities for delegation. - Delegation was initially proposed to promote more MKR to be used for voting in Governance. - It worked but now with just two or three Delegates you can pass an entire executive. - Regarding Governance voting, we need to break down the problem, the goal, and the solution. - We also need to look into MKR tokenomics; MKR whales have no incentive to vote in Governance. - The time that a Delegate spends does not match the output that the Delegate is physically able to release. - GovAlpha has been in discussion with various VCs to incentivize to delegate their MKR. - Issues they brought up: Not enough Delegates and no clear formal process. - Another way that VCs can do is bring in their own Delegates to Maker, which may hinder communication and transparency.