# Peer review instructions 2DT00E All students have two reviews to do. Think of this as helping each others progressing, all feedback needs to be well thought and aim for helping your peer to do better. I want you to spend some time doing some quick background searching while you do your peer review. Is there anything that they have missed, any new perspective you want to add that you think is missing? What you need to do: - [ ] **21st April. Report Ch 1-3 for review.** - [ ] **22nd April. You will be assigned two papers for review.** - [ ] **25th April. Hand in your review.** - [ ] **26th April. Mini seminar, zoom 15-17.** The peer review is both mailed to the peer and handed in at the same place you handed in your Project plan in the Sub-folder Peer Review @ Google Drive. We will do a mini-seminar the **26th of May 15-17 at Zoom**. You need to be done with your review at **latest 25th of May**. Structure from template. 1. Introduction * Background * Relatedwork * Problem formulation * Motivation * Scope/Limitation * Target group * Outline 2. Theory 3. Method --- The following points needs to be addressed (not just with Yes/No): General: - [ ] Stick to present tense throughout the report. - [ ] Precise and concrete, and use a vocabulary suitable for your problem domain - [ ] References according to standard. - [ ] All figures and tables in the report should be referenced and explained in the main text. - [ ] Not any value words, "better", "smaller", etc. - [ ] Not "I have done" .. --- ### Background - [ ] Structure: Is the background starting from a broad perspective, and narrowing down on the problem? - [ ] Is the background problem well defined? - [ ] Do you understand why this is a problem worth investigating? - [ ] Are the references relevant? ### Related work - [ ] Are the related work relevant for this report? - [ ] Are the sources relevant? Did you find anything better? - [ ] Do you have any general comments that might have been missed? ### Problem formulation/Motivation/Scope/Limitation - [ ] Problem related to the background? - [ ] What is the knowledge gap? - [ ] Are the expected results well defined, and is it reasonable? - [ ] Are the limitations described and reasonable? ### Method - [ ] Do you understand how the project is going to be done? - [ ] Which methods are used? - [ ] Are the methods used referenced? - [ ] Are there any statistical analysis planned? - [ ] Are the methods well motivated? - [ ] Do you have any other comments of the Method?