# R252 Project Retrospective
---
## Marking dimensions
* Extent of work
* Understanding
* Presentation
* Originality
---
## Marking process

---
## Marking process
1. Read each report and score along 4 axes
1. Compare relative score along each axis
1. Simple average to obtain overall mark
1. Rank all reports
1. Check if ranking makes sense, adjust
1. Doublecheck where disagreement
---
## Writing reports

---
### Advice 1: skimread-friendly
* assume multi-pass reading
* abstract, figures+captions, salient bits
* figure captions are *important*
* bullet point summary of contributions
* X et al's contributions were
* I reproduce these claims
* I extended it with these claims
---
### Advice 2: self-contained
* don't assume I'll read background paper
* define acronyms
* don't just say (X et al, 2022), say what they did
---
### Advice 3: shorten things
* report should be as short as possible
* while demonstrating understanding
{"metaMigratedAt":"2023-06-16T20:17:09.186Z","metaMigratedFrom":"Content","title":"R252 Project Retrospective","breaks":true,"contributors":"[{\"id\":\"e558be3b-4a2d-4524-8a66-38ec9fea8715\",\"add\":1039,\"del\":0}]"}