Geometry Nodes Retrospective
8 May, 2023

## 3.5
What went well
* Individual projects leading up to something big
* Simon involvement, since many of the new features make sense as node groups these days
* Postponing simulation nodes
* High polish of demo files and icons and overall experience (also the Move to Node)

What didn't go well
* The scope (number of groups) was too ambitious.
* Not enough stakeholders who were continuosly involved in the process.
* Committing big features too late in the development phase.
* Module meetings are not interesting enough for others. The mix of big decisions and small decisions make things tricky.

Improvements
* Focus on MVPs to validate the pipelines before building at scale.
* More focused planning at least for critical times.
* Involve stakeholders in the planning.
* Focus the meeting for product and gathering feedback.

## 3.6
What went well

What didn't go well

Improvements