User Stories PAM2020
===

###### tags: `PAM`

* Planificación por sprint: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TC-zmlcorkOS4pDQ7fNT8aklm-CkferOZGqEgc0Vo80/edit#gid=1791174897
* Cajón de sastre: https://hackmd.io/kt6xK7qcTZqAhJmdL5rFLw

[TOC]

---
## EPIC: Improve the Debates component
https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6002

---

## Edit my debate
https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6185

----

## Close my debate
https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6186

----

## Add hashtags on Debate description
https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6187

----

## Add hashtags in Comments
https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6188

----

## Endorse a Debate
https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6189

----

## Flag a Debate
https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6190

----

## Embed a Debate
https://github.com/decidim/decidim/issues/6191

---

## Improve the Debates component: Listing

ref: PP021

### User story

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
As a visiting user, I want to have more filtering options in the debates, be able to sort them and see some metadata from the general listing cards.

**Describe the solution you'd like**

In addition to the current filters, which are Origin and Category, I want to have the following filters:
- [Hashtags](https://decidim-design.herokuapp.com/public/proposals/proposals-with-filters)
- Status (Open / Closed)
- Scope

I also want to be able to sort them by the following options:
- Random
- Most recent
- Most commented
- Most recently updated

Finally, I'd like to view an improved design of the debates cards (some cards now appear with a loose icon if the dates for an AMA are not added), and I'd also like to see the last active participant in every debate.

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
To implement the hashtags filters on Proposals

**Additional context**
URL: https://www.decidim.barcelona/processes/PlaLitoralBCN/f/2976/

:art: **Frontend**


**Does this issue could impact on users private data?**
No

### Acceptance criteria

As a visiting user I can:

- [ ] filter debates by category
- [ ] filter debates by status
- [ ] filter debates by scope
- [ ] search debates by hashtags
- [ ] sort debates by random
- [ ] sort debates by recent
- [ ] sort debates by most commented
- [ ] sort debates by most updated
- [ ] see the debates cards design fixed
- [ ] see the last active participant of a debate

### Related issues
#1337

---
## Improve Debates component: Detail metadata

ref: PP023

### User story

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**

As a visitor I want to see how many unique users commented and how many User Groups have commented on a debate.

**Describe the solution you'd like**

To see the summary metadata of the debate:
- Number of unique participants who have commented in the debate
- Number of unique user groups commenting on the debate

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
To show this data on a smaller scale. This should be visible on other
To not show this data, as this is something that other platforms (Discourse, Meneame, Reddit, HN, etc) don't give, as this is some analytics that are extracted on a posterior analysis.

**Additional context**

URL: https://www.decidim.barcelona/processes/PlaLitoralBCN/f/2976/debates/57

:art: **Frontend**


**Does this issue could impact on users private data?**
No

### Acceptance criteria
- [ ] As a visitor I can see how many unique users commented on a debate
- [ ] As a visitor I can see how many unique users groups commented on a debate

### Related issues
Metadecidim link

---

## Title

ref: PP0XX

### User story

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**

**Describe alternatives you've considered**

**Additional context**

**Does this issue could impact on users private data?**

### Acceptance criteria

### Related issues

---

## ~~Proposal creation with only some levels of Scopes~~ (hecho?)

ref: PP043

### User story

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**

As an administrator of a participatory process, I want that participants only have access to a level of the Scopes on Proposal creation form.

**Describe the solution you'd like**

When I go to the form creation as a participant, I should only have access to some of the levels of Scopes, as we do with MAX_DEPTH

Right now on Barcelona we have the following Scopes: City > Districts > Neighborhoods. We need to only have Districts > Neighborhoods on Proposals (Filter and Creation form), as this is what the normative says for this process (Participatory Budgeting 2020).

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
To have other way to select Scopes with different levels.

**Additional context**

:art: **Frontend**

**Does this issue could impact on users private data?**
No

### Acceptance criteria
- [ ] As an admin I can define the max depth of scopes for a given set of proposals.
- [ ] As a participant I have to select a minimum number of budget projects

### Related issues
https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/13275
https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/15051