# Prep for talking about the CCO

## What are our gaps?

What URL should we be using to share the deck?

Is there a financial upside for contributing?

On the "no degens" topic: the idea is to attract regens that will not pull their contribution at a later date? This includes war camp contributors? And how this relates to financial upside: yes, but we hope you don't pull later?

Token questions:

- why low trading volume
- LP mechanics
- Why high price? 👇
- price movement - cco vs. market buy

> **Token Qs Possible Answers:**
>
> 1. **Why high premium for HAUS token in CCO**
> - Low liquidity on GC (high slippage)
> - HAUS is not on Mainnet
> - HAUS is more valuable than the market suggests
> 2. **Utility of Token, Governance Power, & Value Captue**
> - Participate in UberHaus (federation)
> - Pathways for individual holders to get directly involved in UberHaus without having to mediated by another DAO
> - HAUS tokens will have more governance power
> - utility is limited today, proof of material contribution
> - Many ways for HAUS token to accrue value over time, especially with the release of additional boosts and the interrelationship of DAOs through leveraging Moloch v3
> - Fee revenue from marketplace to go to buybacks or be utilized by UberHaus.
> - Index or Basket of CCO tokens
> - Stake HAUS to obtain advanced coordination powers

- Having a clean and clear answer for how Moloch will remain a public good while at the same time there is value capture with HAUS token.
- How this relates to SEC Howey TEST

## Vision, Mission, Problem

Clear and inspiring way to articulate who we are and what we are focused on.

Please feel free to articulate it in language you are comfortable with.

> [name=bau]

DAOhaus is uniquely positioned to help purpose driven communities to achieve their collective goals and mission, while promoting and maintaing the individual sovereignty of it's individual members.

**DAOhaus Focus**
- Purpose driven community DAOs

Our focus is DAOs that exist to support the individuals within them, not on the maintenance or output of DAO/protocol.

**Why DAOhaus is Different**
- No VC money EVER!
- Anyone can come and add value (sovereignty)
- Fundamentally geared toward the lay person
- doesn't enshrine principles of shareholder capitalism (token voting models)
- the security model is much different in a DAOhaus DAO vs any other DAO (moloch)

**The Big Three**
- Platform
- Community
- Economy

**Why haven't we grown more?**
- We are not only building the tool & making assumptions.
- we have experience, we've got dirt under our nails.
- we are the most experienced DAO operators in the space, this is a function of the time we've put into building, researching, and using this technology.
- it takes time to build strong coordination tools

**DELIVERING SO MUCH MORE VALUE PER DOLLAR** than other projects - https://daohaus.club/review/

#### The Crux of the Issue

- We are building DAO technology
- Other DAOs exist, but don't exist in the same form that we ourselves have organized in.
- The alternatives we're developing solve fundamental problems within token voting models and other governance models for DAOs.
- The fast convenient way to governance in web3 is not sustainable (show why)

#### Framing DAOhaus in the context of different DAO frameworks

- Providing context to the different DAO frameworks and how HAUS is different from our competition
- Highlighting areas DAOhaus does particularly well with DAO coordination tools
- Boost Marketplace
- CCO
- Yeeter
- The product has been developed by the community for the community.

**Doubling Down on What Has Worked**