---
# System prepended metadata

title: Warcamp Contributor Compensation and Coordinape Notes (3/29/2022)

---

# Warcamp Contributor Compensation and Coordinape Notes (3/29/2022)

## Proxy Measurements

- What additional proxy measurements can we put in place to help approximate value levels?
- Weighted Proxy Measurement
    - Tracking folks weight over time is also a measurement in itself and gets us closer to an accurate monthly representation of the value of folks contributions
    - Current issues with the Coordinape process:
        - Potentially biased toward folks who do more *visible* work across the DAO
        - Folks all have equally weighted 100 GIVE


## Coordinape Proxy Measurement Process

- Admins can export the Coordinape allocation data (CSV)
- Duplicate the Epoch so that the formulas are preserved
- Paste data in columns B - E
- Eligible:
    - Calculating based on who gave
    - Giver and non-giver
- Distro
    - Amount of HAUS
    - 600 HAUS total each month
        - This can change if we *decide to*
    - Give/HAUS then multipled by the amount of GIVE
    - Should add to 600
    - This goes into the Disperse Boost
- Import into Google Sheets
- 
- Map the ratio of giveHAUS received out of the total to the expected results based on level and value
- 

- Move into the Contributors_C3 tab
- There is value to having this each month
- Name, Discord, Address, Month
    - Don't calculate the deltas here -- we'd then have multiple Dashboards that would be linked out from here
    - Raw table and table with transformations on the source data while doing transformations at the month level
    - Preserve the raw data and have the ability to aggregate on top of this
    - What degree do we need to do here?
- `importrange` and change to current epoch
    - C2:J100
    - Eligible -> who is getting paid HAUS
    - Received -> what was actually received via Coordinape
- Zero Sum
    - Explanations for positive deltas:
        - Working more than expected (pure quantity)
        - Creating more value on per unit basis than expected
        - People *think* you're working more than you are
        - People *think* you're providing more value than you are
- Allocate give to those you are directly working with and those whos work impacts you
- And those who directly 
- How do we address the Coordinape GIVE fidelity within our current structure?
    - Weighting
    - Stop sprinkling!
    - How do we do this culturally?
- What would help with this argument is to be able to visualize some of the data
- For every month for the past 5 months the folks who are contributing less (time/value wise) are getting overweighted
    - Show this, draw conclusion about how this has impact
    -  Need the data in a better structure
    -  

## Notes and Questions

- How can we track this data over time? 
- What pain points would a *recursive weight* help solve in our Coordinape allocations?
- 