# Connect Rebuild ### The problems - Code is clean in the context, but raunchy in the utils - It's hard to configure the networks - We can't configure connect to work only for one network (needed for standalone DAO apps and templates) - I want to be able to use Connect without the UI (so I can use custom UI in my app) - Connect data served from context could be easier to work with (ex, chainId is string | null | undefined.) ### The Solutions **Configuration** - [x] Test if devs can configure their networks, and if it doesn't work, then create the paths to do so ~~networks dropdown. Locks in DAOview. - [x] Build lifecycle methods - [ ] Once UI is separated Test if I can use connect w/out props. Consider making a template with material UI (create separate issue). - [ ] Test if I can use context with a different RPC (might need until deploying on new network) **Packaging** - [x] Refactor out Context and non-reusable utils to ``connect-context`` - [ ] ~~Refactor our Connect UI to ``connect-ui``~~ - [ ] ~~Refactor layouts and create configurable routing pattern to~~ ``exoskeleton`` Make issue, keep in ``connect-ui`` for now. - [x] Refactor all keychain related data to ``keychain-utils`` **Housekeeping** - ``isValidNetwork`` and ``ValidNetwork``should only be used to test if the network is a possible network. This isn't really all that useful in anything besides keychain types. - [x] Create an AppNetwork type that is an array of network id keys derived from the network config - [x] Create a isAppNetwork type that runs **inside the context** and tests if a given string is one of the app's supported networks. - In the interest of getting on with our lives, let's make this non-breaking so that ValidNetwork and isValidNetwork still work. That way the current apps will still work as expected - We can begin to use ``isAppNetwork`` where its useful - See if we're still using the bundled keychain structure (Network config), find any instances of it and remove. Just use readable, static data. - Keychains are good, but it will require that we update the chainId properties manually if we support new networks. - [x] Correct mark NETWORK_DATA as HAUS_NETWORK_DATA as it pertains to our own networks, not a dev's networks - [x] Rename TEMPORARY_RPC to HAUS_RPC - [x] Move RPCs to utils - [x] NetworkData should have RPCs - [x] Remove HAUS_RPCS and try to use network data - [x] Replace RPC_ENPOINTS in admin/utils/constants with RPCs from connect - [x] Remove addKeychain Utils - [x] Amalagmate explorer links - [x] Move all keychain data into keychains utils folder - [x] Try to replace all instances of NETWORK_DATA in UI with ``networks`` from connect so users can data from networks that we don't support - [x] Do the same for RPCs where applicable - [x] Replace all instances of TEMPORARY_RPC - [ ] Remove RadixColors import in deps - [x] Clean up confusing connectWallet pattern - [x] Rename CONTRACTS => CONTRACT_KEYCHAINS - [x] ~~Rename HausConnectContext => DHConnect~~ - [x] Rename HausConnectProvider => DHConnectProvider - [x] Rename useHausConnect => useDHConnect - [x] Rename HausLayout => DHLayout **For Later** - [ ]TXBuiler uses HAUS-RPC, should we allow the user to pass their own network config inside? Currently, if a dev wanted to decode action data, it would require them to use our static RPC pattern - [ ]While we're in TXBuilder, we move all the decoding utils over to utils.