---
# System prepended metadata

title: '# motivation system'

---

tags:: like

- problems
	- no collective motivation: no options for success
	- no personal motivation: grants are the same for everyone
	- no motivation for token growth: grants computed in usd terms
	- we grew to 5 teams led by 6 leaders: org system must scale
	- slow feedback and price shocks: monthly payments, not weekly
- proposal 1: 35T options for $1b
	- why 35T
		- around 1/4 of congress for reaching first key milestone
		- could be increased in case of onboarding more teams
		- onboarding more teams can be done without changing total options by leaders consensus
		- decided by cybercongress core
	- why $1b?
		- enough for recognition as network state
		- industry scale visibility
		- competitiveness with evil corp
		- leaders of deai
		- upgrade of hardware infrastructure
	- is it possible?
		- if you think is not - go out now
		- right attitude - what should we do?
		- ask every day, not now
	- option is split by teams based on average leaders grade
	- current teams
		- sigma
		- cyberlabs
		- bronbro
		- cyberdbot
		- prophet
		- academy
	- terms
		- must hold 30 days
		- coingecko valuation
		- options could float a bit
- proposal 2: grants based on team self evaluation in H
	- core is static @mastercyb and @cyberhead
	- core define leaders and set their grades
	- leaders define their team members and their grades within leader max grade
	- zero grade for alumni without leaders
	- amount of member's votes is {total amount of members} * {grade}
	- every week at +9GMT thursday sigma of cybercongress account is measured
	- every week before thursday +10GMT anyone can update their votes
	- members can not vote for themselves
	- total amount of payouts is {sigma} * {magic number}
	- current magic number is 0.002
	- magic number is defined by a curve which bonds it to sum of grades
		- ![image.png](../assets/image_1689842055299_0.png)
	- magic number will be certainly optimized in the future
	- payout is {sigma} * {magic number} * {share of votes received}
- result
	- collective motivation: around 3% of bostrom
	- personal motivation: grant differs based on contribution defined collectively
	- motivation for token growth: grants computed in H terms
	- org system could scale: leaders decide involvement of team members
	- weekly payouts: faster feedback and less price shocks
	- if we reach a goal we could afford grants comparable with openai and google
- what else needed in motivation system
	- onchain valuation
		- depends on [[warp indexer]]
		- could be done on
	- secrecy of voting
		- in general public voting setup could work
			- for our scale
			- with our level of trust
			- some time until toxins being accumulated
		- good part of starting with public setup is that it reveals unknown connections
		- zkp must be used for the system being sustainable
	- automation
		- first could be implemented without secrecy and onchain valuation
		- must be done as soon as become clear the system works
	-