tags:: like

- problems
- no collective motivation: no options for success
- no personal motivation: grants are the same for everyone
- no motivation for token growth: grants computed in usd terms
- we grew to 5 teams led by 6 leaders: org system must scale
- slow feedback and price shocks: monthly payments, not weekly
- proposal 1: 35T options for $1b
- why 35T
- around 1/4 of congress for reaching first key milestone
- could be increased in case of onboarding more teams
- onboarding more teams can be done without changing total options by leaders consensus
- decided by cybercongress core
- why $1b?
- enough for recognition as network state
- industry scale visibility
- competitiveness with evil corp
- leaders of deai
- upgrade of hardware infrastructure
- is it possible?
- if you think is not - go out now
- right attitude - what should we do?
- ask every day, not now
- option is split by teams based on average leaders grade
- current teams
- sigma
- cyberlabs
- bronbro
- cyberdbot
- prophet
- academy
- terms
- must hold 30 days
- coingecko valuation
- options could float a bit
- proposal 2: grants based on team self evaluation in H
- core is static @mastercyb and @cyberhead
- core define leaders and set their grades
- leaders define their team members and their grades within leader max grade
- zero grade for alumni without leaders
- amount of member's votes is {total amount of members} * {grade}
- every week at +9GMT thursday sigma of cybercongress account is measured
- every week before thursday +10GMT anyone can update their votes
- members can not vote for themselves
- total amount of payouts is {sigma} * {magic number}
- current magic number is 0.002
- magic number is defined by a curve which bonds it to sum of grades
- 
- magic number will be certainly optimized in the future
- payout is {sigma} * {magic number} * {share of votes received}
- result
- collective motivation: around 3% of bostrom
- personal motivation: grant differs based on contribution defined collectively
- motivation for token growth: grants computed in H terms
- org system could scale: leaders decide involvement of team members
- weekly payouts: faster feedback and less price shocks
- if we reach a goal we could afford grants comparable with openai and google
- what else needed in motivation system
- onchain valuation
- depends on [[warp indexer]]
- could be done on
- secrecy of voting
- in general public voting setup could work
- for our scale
- with our level of trust
- some time until toxins being accumulated
- good part of starting with public setup is that it reveals unknown connections
- zkp must be used for the system being sustainable
- automation
- first could be implemented without secrecy and onchain valuation
- must be done as soon as become clear the system works
-