--- title: MIP39 tags: Amendments url: https://github.com/makerdao/mips/blob/Core-Unit-Offboarding-Process-Amendment/MIP39/mip39.md --- # MIP39: Core Unit Framework ## Preamble ``` MIP#: 39 Title: Core Unit Framework Author(s): @juanjuan Contributors: @elprogreso, @iammeeoh, @blimps, @gala, @twblack88 Tags: process, core-unit-framework, mip-set, core-unit-framework-mipset Type: Process Status: Accepted Date Proposed: 2021-01-18 Date Ratified: 2021-25-03 Dependencies: MIP38, MIP40, MIP41, MIP4c2-SP10, MIP4c2-SP12 Replaces: n/a Ratification Poll URL: https://vote.makerdao.com/executive/template-executive-vote-approve-march-2021-governance-cycle-bundle-march-22-2021?network=mainnet#proposal-detail Forum URL: https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip39-core-unit-framework/6096 ``` ## References [MIP39c2-Subproposal-Template.md](https://github.com/makerdao/mips/blob/master/MIP39/MIP39c2-Subproposal-Template.md) [MIP39c3-Subproposal-Template.md](https://github.com/makerdao/mips/blob/master/MIP39/MIP39c3-Subproposal-Template.md) ## Sentence Summary MIP39 is part of the Core Unit Framework MIP Set and describes the processes for 1) onboarding and offboarding Core Units, 2) modifying Core Unit Mandates, and 3) renaming Core Units. ## Paragraph Summary MIP39 is part of the Core Unit Framework MIP Set, which further comprises MIP38, MIP40, and MIP41. MIP39 contains the full definition of *Mandate* within the Core Unit Framework; it also establishes the processes for: - Onboarding and offboarding Core Units. - Modifying Core Unit Mandates. - Renaming Core Units. ## Component Summary **MIP39c1: Core Unit Mandate** Defines Core Unit Mandates. **MIP39c2: Adding/Modifying Core Units `(Process Component)`** Defines the processes for onboarding Core Units, refreshing Core Unit Mandates, and renaming Core Units. **MIP39c3: Offboarding Core Units `(Process Component)`** Defines the process for offboarding Core Units. ## Motivation As the Foundation dissolves, MakerDAO must take over the tasks and responsibilities no longer fulfilled by it. We believe MakerDAO's current structure is too ill-defined to be able to integrate these successfully. A new scheme is needed for MakerDAO to achieve this crucial integration on its way to full autonomy. Core Units are designed to be easy-to-transition-to and capable of accommodating both the current structures and the Foundation's newly delegated operations within a coherent framework. Core Units define long-term work areas and cover a broad set of responsibilities or focus. They are the basic units of work that Maker Governance is able to oversee, manage and prioritize. ## Specification / Proposal Details ### MIP39c1: Core Unit Mandate Mandates are self-imposed declarations that define the work scope and responsibilities for any given Core Unit. Mandates are initially ratified at onboarding time, but they can be modified at a later time via single MIP39c2 subproposals. In the interest of being flexible, relatively broad and open-ended Mandates are to be preferred over granular Mandates. In the interest of promoting redundancy, parallelization, and decentralization within the DAO, Mandates can overlap across Core Units. Mandates are one of the three fundamental entities that define a Core Unit along with Budgets and Facilitators. The interaction among these entities is lay out in MIP38. ### MIP39c2: Adding/Modifying Core Units MIP39c2 subproposals spearhead the onboarding of Core Units by defining their name and Mandate. Alternatively, when applied singly on a ratified Core Unit, MIP39c2 subproposals can be used to modify its name or Mandate or both. #### Core Unit Onboarding Process A Core Unit is brought into existence within MakerDAO upon the simultaneous, bundled ratification of at least three subproposals: - One MIP39c2 subproposal that defines its name and *Mandate*. - One MIP40c3 subproposal that defines its *Budget*. - One or more MIP41c4 subproposals that define its *Facilitators*. In the particular case of Governance Core Units, their Core Unit ID must have the prefix `GOV`. Although these subproposals can fulfill their Feedback and Frozen Periods independently, they need to be formally submitted at the same time. Upon Formal Submission, these subproposals will be bundled into one single, binary Ratification Poll that can be either fully rejected or fully accepted. |![](https://i.imgur.com/i8SO7AI.png)| |--| | Subproposals involved in the Core Unit onboarding process. (Note that multiple MIP41c4 subproposals can be submitted when a Core Unit is to have more than one Facilitator.) | #### Core Unit Mandate Refreshing Process / Core Unit Renaming Process MIP39c2 subproposals can also be applied singly on ratified, active Core Units to modify their name or Mandate or both. ![](https://i.imgur.com/bcXKles.png) #### Subproposal Parameters and Template The parameters for MIP39c2 subproposals are: - **Minimum Feedback Period**: 1 month. - **Minimum Frozen Period**: 1 week. - **Governance Cycle**: Monthly. MIP39c2 subproposals must use the template located at [MIP39c2-Subproposal-Template.md](https://github.com/makerdao/mips/blob/master/MIP39/MIP39c2-Subproposal-Template.md). ### MIP39c3: Offboarding Core Units (Process Component) Core Units can be offboarded from MakerDAO by utilizing MIP39c3 subproposals. The ratification of a MIP39c3 subproposal triggers the following sequence of events: - Determining who will be executing the unwinding plan: - The Retiring Facilitator - An Interim Facilitator chosen via the Fallback Process defined in MIP41c6. - Adapting the Facilitator's permissions to meet the needs of the unwinding plan - Executing the unwinding plans for the Core Unit An offboarded Core Unit should conduct all winding down activities within four months from the ratification date of the offboarding. #### Unwinding Execution Plan Budgets built after the Core Unit Budget Process ratified via MIP4c2-SP19 include an unwinding plan that defines the tasks to execute at offboarding time and the compensation for them. Legacy budgets do not include unwinding plans. A broad, default plan and a compensation is provided here for them: - Transferring intangible MakerDAO assets (access to DAO-claimable platforms, e-mail accounts, websites, etc.) back into the DAO. - Documenting and delegating the activities previously carried out by the unwinding Core Unit that impact the DAO. To the extent that this is reasonable and possible, provide enough detail so that other Core Units can pick up these activities. - Settling outstanding debts both to contributors and external actors/services. - Returning unused funds. Unwinding compensation will transfer to the Retiring/Interim Facilitator upon completion. The compensation is set to be 33% of the annual salary of the Facilitator of the Core Unit that is being offboarded, as per its latest ratified budget. #### Permissions Immediately after the ratification of the offboarding, some of the Facilitators' permissions will be removed. They will only retain permissions that are necessary for the Core Unit unwinding. At this stage, the Facilitators are to be considered ***Retiring*** Facilitators. #### Overview of the Offboarding Process upon a MIP39c3 Subproposal Ratification |![](https://i.imgur.com/iIGkQce.png) | |--| | Sequence of events triggered by a ratified MIP39c3 subproposal. | MIP39c3 subproposals must use the template located at [MIP39c3-Subproposal-Template.md](https://github.com/makerdao/mips/blob/master/MIP39/MIP39c3-Subproposal-Template.md) The parameters for MIP39c3 subproposals are: - **Minimum Feedback Period**: 1 month. - **Minimum Frozen Period**: 1 week.