Try   HackMD

How Accurate Are AI Code Detectors Compared to Traditional Plagiarism Checkers?

As a Software Integrity Specialist at Codequiry, I spend my days helping educators, students, and coding competition organizers ensure that code submissions are original. Whether you’re a student tackling a programming assignment, a professor grading projects, or a developer contributing to a team, the question of code integrity is critical. With tools like ChatGPT generating functional code in seconds, detecting unoriginal work has become trickier than ever. So, how do modern AI code detectors stack up against traditional plagiarism checkers like the Stanford Code Plagiarism Checker (MOSS)? Let’s dive into the mechanics, compare their strengths and weaknesses, and explore what this means for you.

My goal here isn’t to sell you on a specific tool but to give you a clear, technical understanding of how these systems work and how they can help maintain fairness in coding. By the end, you’ll know what to look for in a plagiarism detection tool and how to avoid common pitfalls when writing code.

Image Not Showing Possible Reasons
  • The image was uploaded to a note which you don't have access to
  • The note which the image was originally uploaded to has been deleted
Learn More →

What Are AI Code Detectors?

The Basics of AI Code Detection

An AI code detector is a tool designed to identify similarities in source code, including code generated by AI models like ChatGPT. Unlike older plagiarism checkers that focus on exact or near-exact matches, AI code detectors dig deeper, analyzing the logic and structure of code. For example, Codequiry’s AI code detector, available at Codequiry’s ChatGPT-Written Code Detector, looks at both peer-to-peer similarities (comparing submissions within a group) and web-based matches (checking against online sources like GitHub or Stack Overflow).

How They Work: A Technical Look

AI code detectors use a combination of techniques to spot unoriginal code:

  • Syntax Analysis: This checks for similar code structures, like identical loops or function definitions. It’s similar to what traditional tools do but with more flexibility to handle reformatted code.
  • Semantic Analysis: This is where AI shines. By building an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), the detector represents the code’s structure and logic, ignoring superficial changes like variable names. For example, two functions that sort an array using different variable names but the same algorithm will have similar ASTs.
  • Control Flow Analysis: Some detectors examine the flow of execution (e.g., the sequence of conditional statements or loops) to catch code that achieves the same result through different syntax.
  • Web-Based Comparison: AI detectors often cross-reference code against online repositories or databases of AI-generated code, identifying matches that traditional tools might miss.
  • Machine Learning Models: Advanced detectors use trained models to recognize patterns typical of AI-generated code, such as overly optimized solutions or unnatural variable naming conventions.

These methods make AI code detectors particularly effective for spotting code that’s been heavily modified or generated by AI, where traditional tools might fall short.

Traditional Plagiarism Checkers: The Case of MOSS

Understanding MOSS

The Stanford Code Plagiarism Checker, known as MOSS (Measure of Software Similarity), has been a go-to tool for educators since the 1990s. It’s free, widely used, and effective for detecting copied code within a set of submissions, like a class assignment. MOSS is a benchmark in the field, and for good reason, it’s reliable for straightforward plagiarism cases.

How MOSS Works

MOSS operates through a process called “fingerprinting”:

  • Tokenization: It breaks code into tokens (e.g., keywords, operators, identifiers) to normalize differences like whitespace or comments.
  • Fingerprinting: MOSS generates unique signatures for code segments, focusing on sequences that are likely to be copied.
  • Similarity Scoring: It compares these signatures across submissions, producing a percentage score to indicate how similar two pieces of code are.

For example, if two students submit nearly identical solutions to a Python problem, MOSS will flag them with a high similarity score. It’s great for catching direct copies or minor tweaks, like renaming variables or shuffling lines.

Limitations of MOSS

MOSS is powerful but has blind spots:

  • Peer-to-Peer Focus: It compares submissions within a dataset, not against external sources like GitHub or AI-generated code.
  • Syntax Sensitivity: Clever students can bypass MOSS by restructuring code (e.g., converting a for loop to a while loop) without changing its logic.
  • No AI Detection: MOSS wasn’t built to handle AI-generated code, which often produces unique syntax for the same logic, making it hard to detect.

AI Code Detectors vs. MOSS: A Fair Comparison

Where AI Code Detectors Excel

AI code detectors address many of MOSS’s limitations:

  • Logical Similarity Detection: By analyzing ASTs and control flow, AI detectors catch code that performs the same task, even if the syntax is completely different. For instance, two implementations of a binary search algorithm might look different but share the same logic, which an AI detector can spot.
  • Web Source Matching: Tools like Codequiry check code against online repositories, catching snippets copied from Stack Overflow or generated by AI tools.
  • Adaptability: AI detectors are updated to recognize new patterns in AI-generated code, keeping pace with tools like ChatGPT.
  • Detailed Reporting: Instead of just a similarity score, AI detectors often provide breakdowns of matches, helping educators understand the context (e.g., “This code matches a GitHub repo with 85% similarity in its AST”).

Where MOSS Still Shines

MOSS isn’t obsolete. It’s still a fantastic tool for specific scenarios:

  • Simplicity and Speed: MOSS is quick and easy to use for small-scale assignments, requiring minimal setup.
  • Cost: It’s free, making it accessible for educators with limited budgets.
  • Proven Reliability: MOSS is hard to beat for detecting direct copies within a class.

A Real-World Example

Imagine a student submits a Python script for a graph traversal algorithm. They used ChatGPT, which generated a unique implementation with custom variable names. MOSS compares it to other student submissions and finds no matches, giving it a clean bill of health. An AI code detector, however, might build an AST, analyze the control flow, and cross-reference it against a database of AI-generated code. If it finds a match with a known ChatGPT output pattern, it flags the submission for review, providing a detailed report on the similarities.

Why Accuracy Matters

For Students

As a student, you want your work to be judged fairly. If someone copies code or uses AI without attribution, it undermines your effort. Accurate detection tools ensure that original work is rewarded, and they help you learn by encouraging you to write your own code.

For Educators

Professors need tools they can trust to maintain academic integrity. AI code detectors provide detailed insights, allowing you to have constructive conversations with students about their work. For example, if a submission is flagged, you can review the report and discuss whether the student misunderstood the rules or needs help with original coding.

For Coding Competitions and Teams

In competitions or software teams, originality is critical to fairness and intellectual property. AI detectors help organizers and developers verify that submissions or contributions are authentic, preventing disputes or legal issues.

Practical Tips to Avoid Plagiarism Traps

Here’s how you can ensure your code stays original and avoid accidental plagiarism:

  • Understand the Rules: Ask your instructor or team lead what’s allowed. Can you use Stack Overflow snippets if you cite them? What about AI tools? Clarity prevents mistakes.
  • Document Your Sources: If you adapt code from a tutorial or forum, comment it in your code with a link or note.
  • Use Version Control: Tools like Git track your code’s evolution, proving it’s your work. Commit often with clear messages to show your thought process.
  • Test Your Understanding: If you use AI or online resources for help, rewrite the code in your own style to ensure you understand it. Avoid copy-pasting without comprehension.
  • Ask for Feedback: Share drafts with peers or instructors to get early input, reducing the temptation to borrow code under pressure.

For educators, consider setting up coding assignments with unique constraints (e.g., specific input formats) to make copying harder. Tools like Codequiry can complement this by providing data to guide your reviews, not replace your judgment.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Code Integrity

AI coding tools are here to stay, and so is the need for robust detection systems. AI code detectors are evolving to handle increasingly sophisticated code generation, using techniques like deep learning to spot subtle patterns. Meanwhile, traditional tools like MOSS will continue to serve as reliable, cost-effective options for simpler cases. The key is choosing the right tool for your needs, catching blatant copies in a classroom or spotting AI-generated code in a competition.

Wrapping Up

AI code detectors and traditional plagiarism checkers like the Stanford Code Plagiarism Checker (MOSS) have their place in ensuring code integrity. MOSS is great for quick, peer-to-peer comparisons, while AI detectors like Codequiry’s advanced code similarity checker offer deeper analysis, catching AI-generated code and web-based matches. By understanding how these tools work—through tokenization, ASTs, or machine learning you can make informed choices about protecting originality in your work or institution.

As someone who works with these tools daily, I can tell you they’re not just about catching copied code—they’re about creating a fair and honest coding environment. Whether you’re a student, educator, or professional, the goal is to reward genuine effort and creativity. So, the next time you’re tempted to reuse a snippet or lean on ChatGPT, consider how you can truly make the code your own and how modern code similarity checker tools help maintain fairness across the programming community.