# 2021-02-08 CNF WG Contributing Guide draft - issue https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/issues/56 ### DRAFT: # Contributing to the CNF Working Group Welcome to the Cloud Native Network Function (CNF) Working Group! This is an open, public working group (WG) welcoming anyone who would like to help identify cloud native best practices applicable to networking applications. We're glad you're here! To learn about this working group, [read the CNF WG charter](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/blob/master/charter.md). Except as otherwise noted, the content of this repo is licensed under the [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ([local copy](LICENSES/CC-BY-4.0.txt)), and any code is licensed under the [Apache 2.0 License](http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html) ([local copy](LICENSES/APACHE-2.txt)). See more at https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/blob/master/LICENSE.md. ### Where to Contribute Contributors are encouraged to collaborate using the following resources: - [Weekly public community meetings](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg#meetings) - Review [past meetings on YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JPUOulYfxA&list=PLj6h78yzYM2PyMYvw5wiH01hthFb0qrOn) - CNCF Slack ([get an invite here](https://slack.cncf.io/)) - [#cnf-wg](https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C01F1LVAQCC) - CNF WG mailing list - https://lists.cncf.io/g/cnf-wg - Discussion board on GitHub - https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/discussions - Pull Requests - https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/pulls - Issue Tracker - https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/issues ### What to Contribute We welcome many different types of contributions including: - General improvements to documentation - [Use cases](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/tree/master/use-case) and user stories - Definitions - eg. [Actors and Roles](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/discussions/30) - Requirements - Classification - Common - eg. fast per-packet networking - Special - eg. integration with specific protocols - Levels/structuring - From high-level business requirement to specific technology features - eg. policy and regulation -> segmentation of traffic -> multiple L2 networks -> multiple host interfaces -> CNI -> MyFavoriteCNI - See [Networking Requirements for CNFs](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/discussions/37) GitHub discussion - Gap Analysis - [CNF Examples](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/discussions/35) - [Best Practices](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/tree/master/doc#best-practices-for-cnf-developers) ### How to Contribute #### Join a GitHub Discussion - Go to the [GitHub Discussion board](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/discussions) - Participate in existing discussions - eg. [Defining actors and audiences](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/discussions/30) - Add new discussion topics - Reference Issues, PRs, and existing content from the [CNF WG repo](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg) #### Find an Issue Review, contribute to, create new [GitHub issues](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/issues). #### Submit and/or Review Pull Requests Pull Requests are always welcome, even for small fixes like typos. Reviews and comments on open [Pull Requests](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/pulls) are also appreciated. ### Express Your Interest The CNF WG charter contains a list of organizations that are interested in these efforts. To add your organization name, please submit a Pull Request to edit the [interested parties section of the charter](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/blob/master/charter.md#interested-parties). ### Code of Conduct The CNF WG community follows the CNCF [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/cncf/cnf-wg/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md). ### Thank you! Thank you for your participation. We appreciate your help and look forward to collaborating with you! --- END OF DRAFT --- References: --- https://hackmd.io/cryM-DYDQXCPB2AFqeFeHg https://hackmd.io/3VBXoMbeQoGVFaF67htl9w https://github.com/cncf/sig-contributor-strategy/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md https://github.com/goharbor/harbor/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md Copy of TEMPLATE: https://github.com/cncf/project-template/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md # Contributing Guide This is a template contributing guide for CNCF projects that requires editing before it is ready to use. Read the markdown comments, `<!-- COMMENT -->`, for additional guidance. The raw markdown uses `TODO` to identify areas that require customization. * [New Contributor Guide](#contributing-guide) * [Ways to Contribute](#ways-to-contribute) * [Find an Issue](#find-an-issue) * [Ask for Help](#ask-for-help) * [Pull Request Lifecycle](#pull-request-lifecycle) * [Development Environment Setup](#development-environment-setup) * [Sign Your Commits](#sign-your-commits) * [Pull Request Checklist](#pull-request-checklist) * **TODO** <!-- Additional Table of Contents At the top list level, Link to other related docs such as a reviewing guide, developers guide, etc. --> Welcome! We are glad that you want to contribute to our project! 💖 As you get started, you are in the best position to give us feedback on areas of our project that we need help with including: * Problems found during setting up a new developer environment * Gaps in our Quickstart Guide or documentation * Bugs in our automation scripts If anything doesn't make sense, or doesn't work when you run it, please open a bug report and let us know! ## Ways to Contribute We welcome many different types of contributions including: <!-- TODO: project maintainers fill in exactly which type of contributions you are willing to shepherd through your processes to make sure that contributors feel successful with their contributions. Make sure that you provide clear information about security concerns (are they handled in the open? Submitted to a different list with high priority?) --> * New features * Builds, CI/CD * Bug fixes * Documentation * Issue Triage * Answering questions on Slack/Mailing List * Web design * Communications / Social Media / Blog Posts * Release management <!-- Think about your project's contribution ladder, and if it makes sense, encourage people to review pull requests as a way to contribute as well --> Not everything happens through a GitHub pull request. Please come to our [meetings](TODO) or [contact us](TODO) and let's discuss how we can work together. <!-- TODO: project maintainers fill in details about what people should not do with contributions. Examples might include don’t change version information or update changelogs. --> ### Come to meetings! Absolutely everyone is welcome to come to any of our meetings. You never need an invite to join us. In fact, we want you to join us, even if you don’t have anything you feel like you want to contribute. Just being there is enough! You can find out more about our meetings [here](TODO). You don’t have to turn on your video. The first time you come, introducing yourself is more than enough. Over time, we hope that you feel comfortable voicing your opinions, giving feedback on others’ ideas, and even sharing your own ideas, and experiences. ## Find an Issue We have good first issues for new contributors and help wanted issues suitable for any contributor. [good first issue](TODO) has extra information to help you make your first contribution. [help wanted](TODO) are issues suitable for someone who isn't a core maintainer and is good to move onto after your first pull request. Sometimes there won’t be any issues with these labels. That’s ok! There is likely still something for you to work on. If you want to contribute but you don’t know where to start or can't find a suitable issue, you can **TODO** <!-- say how people can reach out to you for help finding something to work on --> Once you see an issue that you'd like to work on, please post a comment saying that you want to work on it. Something like "I want to work on this" is fine. ## Ask for Help The best way to reach us with a question when contributing is to ask on **TODO** <!-- Replace one of the options below with how a contributor can best ask for help on your project when working on a issue --> * The original github issue * The developer mailing list * Our Slack channel ## Pull Request Lifecycle **TODO** <!-- This is an optional section but we encourage you to think about your pull request process and help set expectations for both contributors and reviewers. Instead of a fixed template, use these questions below as an exercise to uncover the unwritten rules and norms your project has for both reviewers and contributors. Using your answers, write a description of what a contributor can expect during their pull request. * When should contributors start to submit a PR - when it’s ready for review or as a work-in-progress? * How do contributors signal that a PR is ready for review or that it’s not complete and still a work-in-progress? * When should the contributor should expect initial review? The follow-up reviews? * When and how should the author ping/bump when the pull request is ready for further review or appears stalled? * How to handle stuck pull requests that you can’t seem to get reviewed? * How to handle follow-up issues and pull requests? * What kind of pull requests do you prefer: small scope, incremental value or feature complete? * What should contributors do if they no longer want to follow-through with the PR? For example, will maintainers potentially refactor and use the code? Will maintainers close a PR if the contributor hasn’t responded in a specific timeframe? * Once a PR is merged, what is the process for it getting into the next release? * When does a contribution show up “live”? Here are some examples from other projects: * https://porter.sh/src/CONTRIBUTING.md#the-life-of-a-pull-request --> ## Development Environment Setup **TODO** <!-- Provide enough information so that someone can find your project on the weekend and get set up, build the code, test it and submit a pull request successfully without having to ask any questions. If there is a one-off tool they need to install, of common error people run into, or useful script they should run, document it here. Document any necessary tools, for example VS Code and recommended extensions. You don’t have to document the beginner’s guide to these tools, but how they are used within the scope of your project. * How to get the source code * How to get any dependencies * How to build the source code * How to run the project locally * How to test the source code, unit and "integration" or "end-to-end" * How to generate and preview the documentation locally * Links to new user documentation videos and examples to get people started and understanding how to use the project --> ## Sign Your Commits <!-- TODO: Based on your project, keep either the DCO or CLA section below --> ### DCO Licensing is important to open source projects. It provides some assurances that the software will continue to be available based under the terms that the author(s) desired. We require that contributors sign off on commits submitted to our project's repositories. The [Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO)](https://developercertificate.org/) is a way to certify that you wrote and have the right to contribute the code you are submitting to the project. You sign-off by adding the following to your commit messages. Your sign-off must match the git user and email associated with the commit. This is my commit message Signed-off-by: Your Name <your.name@example.com> Git has a `-s` command line option to do this automatically: git commit -s -m 'This is my commit message' If you forgot to do this and have not yet pushed your changes to the remote repository, you can amend your commit with the sign-off by running git commit --amend -s ### CLA We require that contributors have signed our Contributor License Agreement (CLA). <!--Explain the process for how to sign or link to it here --> ## Pull Request Checklist When you submit your pull request, or you push new commits to it, our automated systems will run some checks on your new code. We require that your pull request passes these checks, but we also have more criteria than just that before we can accept and merge it. We recommend that you check the following things locally before you submit your code: **TODO** <!-- list both the automated and any manual checks performed by reviewers, it is very helpful when the validations are automated in a script for example in a Makefile target. Below is an example of a checklist: * It passes tests: run the following command to run all of the tests locally: `make build test lint` * Impacted code has new or updated tests * Documentation created/updated * We use [Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, CircleCI] to test all pull requests. We require that all tests succeed on a pull request before it is merged. -->