# 2025-12 CentOS board meeting https://hackmd.io/@centosboard/Byeos3kSel Passcode will be sent to participants and guests the day the meeting takes place. # 2025-12 CentOS board meeting - Agenda # Attendees ## Board members * Amy * David * Jefro * Mike * Pat * Shaun * Steve * Troy ## Directors Absent * Davide * Jack * Johnny ## Guests * Neal Gompa * Peter Georg # Agenda * Previous minutes * https://hackmd.io/@centosboard/HkpxYMY1-g ### On going discussion * AI Policy governance continuation * * SIG Rollup status * Can't make a distro - restriction * Stream, EPEL, and SIG snapshots * Troy will talk to Fabian, David might have a place * SIG Council Status * Announce it at Connect? Introduce folks * Maybe do a meeting early January * Short session at Connect - Amy will submit ### Issues https://gitlab.com/CentOS/Board/tracker/-/issues **Issues to be closed (ACTION close all of them if no objection)** * None **New issues** **Issues on hold** * None ### Community Architect updates * CentOS Connect CFP closes Monday, December 15. * https://cfp.fedoraproject.org/centos-connect-2026/cfp * Please register for CentOS Connect if you want swag and food. * https://www.centos.org/events/connect/ * Sponsor opportunities are available for CentOS Connect. * https://gitlab.com/CentOS/promo/centos-events/-/raw/main/2026-01-connect/connect-2026-sponsor-prospectus.pdf * FOSDEM Distros Devroom is on Sunday. No CentOS booth, but we'll hang with Fedora. * Flock CFP is open too. * https://www.fedoraproject.org/flock/2026/ * https://cfp.fedoraproject.org/flock-to-fedora-2026/ * Newsletter hasn't happened in months. Posting one today. We need to find better solutions to solicit content. * Ongoing hackmd - https://hackmd.io/ZO2x9Nx9QU6xvEUY9Pgzuw ### SIG Reports ### AOB * TBC ###### tags: `agenda` ## David's notes # CentOS Board Meeting - December 10, 2025 ## AI Policy Governance Continuation Discussion ### Background - Board voted last week to use the Fedora AI document as basis - Continuing discussion on policy implementation details ### Section 2: Accountability Discussion **Pat's concern:** - Raised issue about sentence in Section 2 that seemed to remove something - Self-corrected, saying he might be overthinking it ### Disclosure Requirements Debate **Steve's position:** - If disclosure is mandatory, make the process formal (not suggestion) - Wants automated handling mechanism for disclosure - **Clarification**: Thinks board is recommending (not mandating) a model for implementation - Recommendation is to create automated approach **David Duncan:** - Points out that policy is not the same as practice - (Distinction between what the policy says vs. how it's implemented) **Shaun McCance:** - Identifies that policy is not enforcement - (Policy defines rules, enforcement is separate implementation) **Neal G:** - Fine with removing format details from policy document - As long as the format specification is documented somewhere else ### Resolution Summary (Amy) **First Issue:** Cleared up per Pat's input **Second Issue:** - Needs a developer guide (separate from policy) - Need to determine alignment with RHEL approach - Amy will work on it before or after PTO - Board is clear on what needs to be outlined in the policy document ## Next Agenda Item: BU Perception Issue **Topic:** Business Unit (BU) perception that CentOS team doesn't know how to build a distribution ### Discussion **Troy's Investigation (per Amy):** - Troy was looking into this issue - Asked for clarification on exactly what needs to be done for rollout - Wasn't clear how requirements applied to him specifically - Asked what parts apply to him **Proposed Approach:** - Single point in time where CentOS was not following RHEL cycle - Would annotate and document that deviation **Steve's Clarification:** - "We can't make a distro, but we can make a snapshot of things" - Proposed snapshot would include: - CentOS Stream (CS) - EPEL - All SIGs (Special Interest Groups) ### Solution Identified **Neal's Previous Work:** - This is exactly what Neal was commissioned to do for Hyperscale SIG - Neal worked on this approach and believes his work is ideal for this task - Called a "SIG Rollup" **Troy's Response:** - Was planning to use Neal's work - Now clear on the approach after Neal's explanation - Going to talk to Fabian about implementation methodology ## Next Agenda Item: SIG Council **Question:** Can we have a SIG Council? ### Discussion **Shaun's Status Update:** - Have 7-8 SIGs with committed people to make reports - Wants to know if meeting time works for participants - Ready to schedule something for early January **Connect/FOSDEM Opportunity:** - Shaun suggests doing something at Connect (FOSDEM) - Most people on the list are in Brussels - Thursday has meetup commitments for everyone **Amy's Proposal:** - Can have a slot at Connect event declaring SIG Council work - Prefers formal announcement over showcase format - Better to announce at Connect event - **Action**: Amy will put in the session request **Shaun's Response:** - Can squeeze in a Connect session ### Extended SIG Reporting Discussion **Shaun's Interest:** - Wants to discuss reporting methods and cadence **Neal's Observations:** - Many SIGs guilty of not reporting this year - Doesn't want this to become the new normal - Proposes quarterly reporting for every SIG, offset by one month for continuous content - Thinks low reporting might be anomalistic due to RHEL 10 release activities **Newsletter Format Evolution:** - **Shaun**: Newsletter used to be more "prosey," now more "bullet-pointy" - Uses HackMD for collection - **Amy**: Asked if format was formal - **David Duncan**: Referenced Ansibot for Ansibull as good example - **Troy**: Didn't realize HackMD was available (and he runs SIGs) **Distribution Issues:** - **Shaun**: HackMD might not be widely distributed - **Reference**: https://hackmd.io/ZO2x9Nx9QU6xvEUY9Pgzuw - **Shaun**: Doesn't mind collecting from multiple locations - **Amy**: If people write blogs, could include them in newsletter ## Conference Updates (Shaun) ### CentOS Connect - **Dates**: January 29-30, 2025 - **Location**: DoubleTree (same as last year) - **Timing**: Immediately before FOSDEM - **Format**: Some meetups in open space format - **CFP Deadline**: Submit talks before Monday - **Participation**: Don't have to commit to sitting at specific topics - **Sponsorship**: Opportunities available, prospectus on website - **Registration**: Open now ### FOSDEM - Has distribution track - CFP is closed - Fedora has booth, CentOS Project does not ### Fedora Flock 2026 - **CFP**: Currently open at https://cfp.fedoraproject.org/flock-to-fedora-2026/ - **Main CFP Portal**: https://cfp.fedoraproject.org (Neal notes link not obvious on main page) - **Tracks**: - General - CentOS & Friends - Mentor Summit ## Additional Discussion **Peter's Question:** - Asked about kmods (kernel modules) and if they were being discussed **Neal's Response:** - Pointed nVidia folks to Peter for assistance with kmods ### Fedora CFP Issues **Shaun's Follow-up:** - Referenced CFP for Fedora again - Discussion about lack of clarity on submission dates - Also unclear on travel assistance request process ## Meeting Summary (Amy) Amy covered her three planned topics: 1. **AI Policy** - Resolved first issue, developer guide needed for second 2. **SIG Rollup** - Neal's Hyperscale work provides solution, Troy coordinating with Fabian 3. **SIG Council Planning** - 7-8 committed SIGs, Connect announcement planned **Amy's response:** - Believes formal process was already included in document **Mike M's clarification (Fedora version):** - Uses "must" for stronger AI tool usage requirements - Has lessened requirements for weaker/lighter AI tool usage - Tiered approach based on AI tool usage intensity **Troy Dawson:** - Issue is about specific wording choice - Board wants precise/specific language **Amy's wiki page reference:** - References a wiki page model - Asking if others interpret it as "recommended methods for each type of information" - Potential confusion about recommendations vs. requirements for different AI usage categories ### Key Issues to Resolve - [ ] Formal vs. suggested disclosure process - [ ] Specific wording for requirements - [ ] Tiered approach implementation - [ ] Wiki page model interpretation ## Next Steps TBD ## Attendees - Amy Marrich (Meeting host) - Neal Gompa (Conan Kudo) - Peter Georg - Troy Dawson - Steve Wanless - Shaun McCance (Meeting host) - Mike M - David Duncan - Pat Riehecky - Jefro Osier-Mixon