# AZMET incubator wrap-up ## Tasks - [ ] Transfer ownership of QA/QC repo to Jeremy - [ ] check if GH secrets transfer - [ ] publishing pin to connect also transfer? - [x] `azmetr` can stay with cct-datascience or be transfered to Jeremy - stay with cct-datascience - [ ] Follow up with Jeremy in first week of April - [ ] Jeremy will work on manuscript for Extension Bulletin - [ ] Both will brainstorm scope of work for continued work - [ ] Eric will discuss mechanics of continued funding with rest of CCT team ## Questions 1. Do you feel like you have the resources you need to take ownership (with our continued support)? - Workshops have helped (e.g. {targets} workshop) 3. Do you feel we met the objectives of the proposal? - Checking that stations all were reporting data didn't happen - Part of the success was that we pressed for details on application and deliverables - Meetings with 2 CCT people were valuable because of another creative mind to help get around stumbling blocks 5. How was the timeline? Longer than expected? Shorter than expected? - expectations were set early on, wasn't too long 7. How did it go? *in the proposal phase...* - What went well (proposal phase, work phase, handoff phase)? - push to be more specific about deliverables was beneficial (project was totally clearly defined) - What didn't go well? - Suggestions of things to change or improve? *in the work phase...* - What went well? - Beign part of GitHub repo, getting email notifications helped keep up with progress. Could check out commits and PRs to learn more. - Regular meetings every two weeks was good pace - What didn't go well? - More of Jeremy coding would have put him in a better position to take ownership. - The user-facing part could have been up and running earlier on so Eric could get feedback from Jeremy - Suggestions of things to change or improve? *in the wrapup phase...* - What went well? - This meeting - Nice to have time to reflect on all the work we've done and learn something from it - Expectation for handoff was set early on - What didn't go well? - Transfering ownership of GH repo should happen at a meeting where Jeremy could share screen, ideally before this meeting. - Suggestions of things to change or improve? 5. Is it ok to share the R package and/or the Shiny app on our blog, Twitter, or newsletter? - Jeremy will write something for Extension Bulletin (a peer-reviewed journal) later in March - Wait to announce `azmetr` until Extension Bulletin is published so we can link to it 7. What's the next step for funding continued work? What is the timeframe? - Need to come up with scope of work proposal, Jeremy and Eric will brainstorm next steps in a few weeks. - Eric will discuss with Kristina and the team the details of funding continued work - Eric will follow up with Jeremy at the end of March/beginning of April.