---
# System prepended metadata

title: Open WIN Ambassadors

---

# Open WIN Ambassadors
## Agenda and collaborative notes 

-----

**Important information**

- Date/time: Wednesday 6th July 2022, 10:00-11:00 (GMT/UTC)
- Join the call: MS Teams
- These notes: [https://hackmd.io/@FE_yEojCQPW4PD8RcTWR0A/SJH5rh4XY](https://hackmd.io/@FE_yEojCQPW4PD8RcTWR0A/SJH5rh4XY)
- Discussion: Please join the [Open WIN Slack](https://join.slack.com/t/openwin/signup) Channel #ambassadors-2021 or email cassandra.gouldvanpraag@psych.ox.ac.uk 


<mark>Yellow = action</mark>


-----

## Agenda
1. Participation guidelines and check-in

## Participants
(name / Pronouns / Department / git handles (GitLab;GitHub) / ORCID ID)
1. Cassandra Gould van Praag / she/her / Psychiatry / @cassag;@cassgvp / 0000-0002-8584-4637
2. Dejan Draschkow / he/him / [Experimental Psychology](https://www.psy.ox.ac.uk/team/dejan-draschkow) / [@DejanDraschkow](https://github.com/DejanDraschkow) / [0000-0003-1354-4835](https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1354-4835)
3. Yingshi Feng / she/her / NDCN / [@yingshif](https://github.com/yingshif) / [0000-0001-9065-4945](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9065-4945)
4. Bernd Taschler / he/him / NDCN-FMRIB / [@btaschler](https://github.com/btaschler) / 0000-0001-6574-4789
5. Verena Sarrazin/ she/her / Psychiatry / [@verenasarrazin](https://github.com/verenasarrazin) / 0000-0002-5796-5378
 
## Participation guidelines
- We value the participation of every member of our community and want to ensure that each of us has an enjoyable and fulfilling experience. Please show respect and courtesy to other community members at all times.
- We are dedicated to a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, neurodiversity, physical appearance, body size, race, age, religion, politics or technology choices. We do not tolerate harassment by and/or of members of our community in any form.
- We welcome, support and respect eachother as whole people.
- We fall under the formal policy and reporting guidelines of the University of Oxford Bullying and Harassment Policy and we expect everyone to be a responsible bystander.

-----

## 1. Feedback from lab meetings
- Reminder: Verena presented in her group and received feedback, which we created some new material for, created and issue and tagged a group member.
- Issue: https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/Open-WIN-Community/-/issues/46#note_14620
- What should we do next? We're greatful for MArgot cerating an account. Don't want to over load her right now, so we'll correct the typos for her and tag here in the reply. 
- Does she mean this page: https://open.win.ox.ac.uk/pages/open-science/community/Open-WIN-Community/docs/protocols/protocols_guide_internal-how-1/?
- There are typos all over :). Creating a new issue fid find and correct them. 


## 2. Feedback on Steering Group
- Found it interesting, big technical challenge.
- Felt included in the conversation. 
- There weren't any papers sent round in advance, which might improive the expereicen for others. 

## 3. Feedback on 1-2-1 meetings Cass has with researchers
- Very useful, interesting to see the sorts of questions people have
- suprosed that the questions are quite basic, expected them to be really complicated! 
- Often people want to just have the reassuracen that they're doing the right thing. 
- Question mark about investigating commercial value of code. It's not clear when we need to get HoD approval. 
- **For protocols db we should proabbly add a line "if you are intentding to openly share a custom sequence, please contacts Stuart to arrrange a Tranfer Agreement with Seimens."** Cass created issue.

## 4. Additions to the repo
- Bernd added a quick sesction on mirring to github. Thank you!
- Looked through other open issues, closed [#11](https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/open-science/community/Open-WIN-Community/-/issues/11)!




## X. Feedback on this session
<mark>Please add a few words to each of the sections below so we can improve the expereince of others.</mark>
### What worked well?

### What surprised you?

### What would you change?

### What would you like to know more about?

