---
robots: noindex, nofollow
title: TAoA (extended outline)
---

Dear X,

At the Bicoin Policy Summit in June, I was able to speak with a number of professionals in the cryptocurrency and decentralized identity space. These conversations helped me to organize over a decade's worth of thought on true autonomy in the digital space, and how current systems invert many of the rules and principles that should otherwise protect us.

What follows is my outline of a 40,000+ word essay on the topic, "The Architecture of Autonomy," which is currently undergoing editorial work. I hope you'll find it interesting & let me know if you'd like to see more as I finalize it, or even better if you have leads that might allow me to publish it in a way that will gain widespread attention.

Christopher

# The Architecture of Autonomy - Extended Outline (v0.92)
*A Multi-Part Series on Law, Code, and the Design of Freedom*
by Christopher Allen

v0.92 2025-07-08

## The Unraveling of Digital Freedom

I am working on a series of articles that examines a troubling and accelerating transformation: the systematic inversion of the anti-coercive logic of law by digital systems. Where law once constrained power, code now embeds it.

This isn't just another tech policy paper. It's about an unraveling of freedom on the internet that grants coercive control to corporations and governments, even in supposedly decentralized systems. It's caused by a failure of design, further exacerbated by economic and political capture. The result is an affront to our rights and dignity as human beings.

If we fail to act, we risk entrenching a new form of digital feudalism, creating a world where rights are simulated but control is absolute; where persons are reduced to data and governance is outsourced to code; where freedom is offered in interface but denied in architecture.

## Why This Matters Now

The articles draw on 30 years experience building internet infrastructure, from co-editing TLS 1.0 to architecting W3C's DID standard. Unfortunately, over time, I've watched systems I helped create become instruments of coercion. This series diagnoses how that happened and maps practical paths forward.

The solution requires a dual strategy:
1. **Building alternatives** that demonstrate dignity-respecting systems are possible
2. **Supporting political constraints** through legal frameworks that actually work

Both are necessary. Neither alone is sufficient. We have perhaps 5-10 years before these architectures become unmovable foundations of our digital world.

## The Six Core Inversions

### 1. From Possession to Conditional Access
- **Traditional**: Property law ensures true ownership and many benefits such as "quiet enjoyment" and the ability to exclude others
- **Digital**: Everything is licensed, not owned; access can be revoked without notice; benefits are dictated by the licensor, not the licensee
- **Example**: A father loses 13 years of family photos when Google disables his account over a misinterpreted medical photo

### 2. From Contract to Adhesion
- **Traditional**: Contracts require "meeting of minds" with mutual agreement and consideration
- **Digital**: Click-wrap "agreements" change unilaterally; no negotiation is possible
- **Example**: WhatsApp users are forced to accept data sharing with Facebook or lose decades of message history

### 3. From Due Process to Algorithmic Absolutism
- **Traditional**: Disagreements or violations result in notice, opportunity to respond, and proportional consequences
- **Digital**: Automated enforcement occurs without appeal; permanent exclusion often follows
- **Example**: Small business destroyed when Facebook's algorithm mistakes handmade dolls for policy violations

### 4. From Visible Power to Hidden Infrastructure
- **Traditional**: Everyone can identify who has authority and jurisdiction over them
- **Digital**: There are opaque stack of providers, each disclaiming responsibility
- **Example**: Activists are unable to determine why their communications are blocked or by whom

### 5. From Exit to Erasure
- **Traditional**: Right to leave preserves autonomy; can take your property with you
- **Digital**: Leaving means losing everything: photos, messages, creative works
- **Example**: Leaving Apple ecosystem means losing years of iMessage history

### 6. From Identity to Commodity
- **Traditional**: Legal personhood is inalienable; you define yourself
- **Digital**: Identity is assigned, tracked, and traded; you become the product
- **Example**: Data brokers create profiles you can't see or correct, used for everything from credit to employment

## Mapping the Path Forward

This series begins by diagnosing the problem, then explores possible paths toward systems that better resist coercion.

### Section 1: Shield to Snare
Traces how legal protections designed to resist coercion become tools of control in digital form.

> *"The very systems we built to protect freedom are being systematically weaponized against you. Not through conspiracy, but through systematic incentive alignment that makes extraction more profitable than empowerment."*

### Section 2: Reclaiming Digital Possession
Examines how cryptographic secrets, particularly private keys, offer one authentic reversal of digital dispossession, yet remain fragile without legal recognition.

> *"A private key is not just a number. It is a claim to standing in a digital system—a boundary that says 'this is mine, and you need my permission.' Wyoming understood this. The rest of the world must follow."*

### Section 3: The Infrastructure of Trust
Explores how agency law, entrustment doctrines, and fiduciary principles could make platforms answerable to those who depend on them.

> *"When infrastructure becomes essential, it cannot remain unaccountable. The question is not whether platforms should have duties to their users, but what form those duties must take to preserve both innovation and dignity."*

### Section 4: Identity and Refusal
Returns to the foundations of self-sovereign identity—not as data control, but as the right to contest how systems define us.

> *"To be sovereign is to retain standing in the systems that claim to know you. The power to say 'that is not me'—and for that protest to have consequence."*

### Section 5: Institutional Alternatives
Challenges the conflation of freedom with individual property, exploring collective models that resist coercion through community rather than isolation.

> *"Freedom isn't found in isolated ownership but in the quality of our interdependencies. The question isn't how to eliminate intermediaries, but how to make them ours."*

### Section 6: Meaningful Exit Rights
Examines how true portability and interoperability can make departure empowering rather than destructive.

> *"Exit without continuity is not freedom—it's exile. True autonomy requires not just the right to leave, but the ability to persist."*

### Section 7: Forcing Visibility
Confronts algorithmic governance and the imperative to make power contestable.

> *"Algorithmic systems don't eliminate bias—they launder it through math. Making these systems accountable requires forcing them into visibility, then into contestability."*

### Section 8: Strategic Synthesis
Argues that meaningful change requires building alternatives while supporting direct challenges to platform power.

> *"We don't have to choose between building alternatives and constraining platforms. The communities escaping platform mediation and the movements demanding platform accountability need each other. Neither strategy alone can succeed."*

## Key Frameworks & Insights

### "Infrastructure Plus Money Equals Power"
- Financial exclusion is the ultimate digital coercion
- Control over payment rails enables control over all other activities
- Economic infrastructure therefore must be addressed first

### Human-Scale Coordination
- 25-75 people: Direct democracy remains feasible
- 1,000-10,000: Requires participation inequality management
- 15,000+: Federation necessary to prevent capture

### The Practitioner's Advantage
- Technical architects understand what's actually possible
- Working implementations defeat theoretical objections
- Current projects (XIDs, Gordian Stack) demonstrate alternatives

## A Call to Action

Throughout, this series insists: autonomy is not isolation. It is the right to define our dependencies, contest our representations, and revise the terms of collective life. The goal is not to eliminate intermediaries, but to make them answerable—through law that constrains, code that respects, and culture that remembers.

The inversions affect us all. While different readers may gravitate toward different sections—technologists toward cryptographic solutions, legal practitioners toward fiduciary frameworks, community builders toward cooperative models—what matters is recognizing how these forces interconnect to shape our digital lives.

This is one attempt to meet the challenge—not the only path, but a necessary one. If you work in policy, technology, or advocacy, I invite you to join this effort to reclaim digital dignity before it's too late.

We must act now. Not because the perfect solution awaits, but because every day we delay, these architectures of control sink deeper into the foundation of our digital world. Every day we wait, another generation accepts surveillance as the price of connection, extraction as the cost of creativity, and powerlessness as the nature of digital life.

That is not a future we should accept. Together, we can build better.

## Audience & Applications

### For Policymakers
- Diagnostic framework for platform regulation
- Model legislation for digital rights
- Understanding why current approaches fail

### For Technologists
- Design patterns that preserve user dignity
- Architecture decisions that resist coercion
- Business models beyond surveillance capitalism

### For Advocates
- Language to articulate digital harms
- Coalition building across traditional divides
- Strategic approaches to platform accountability

### For Communities
- Practical alternatives to platform dependence
- Governance models for human-scale coordination
- Economic sustainability without extraction

## About the Author

Christopher Allen is a digital rights architect and advocate who has spent three decades working at the intersection of cryptography, identity, and human coordination. Co-author of the TLS 1.0 standard that secures the web, architect of W3C's DID standard for decentralized identity, and author of the Ten Principles of Self-Sovereign Identity, he brings unique perspective as both a builder of these systems and advocate for their reform.

Currently developing the Gordian Stack and XID coordination infrastructure, Allen works directly with human-scale communities—from creative collectives to security teams—demonstrating that dignity-respecting alternatives to platform mediation are not just possible but practical.

## Current Status & Availability

- Version 0.92 complete (~42,000 words)
- Currently with editor for final review
- Institutional partnerships under development with Bitcoin Policy Institute, EFF, and others
- Full document available on request
- Publication timeline: Q3 2025

**Contact**: [e-mail]