--- title: Swingby Twitter & Discord Audit tags: swingby, discord, twitter, audit --- # Swingby Twitter & Discord Audit ## Twitter ==TBD== ## Discord ### Factors A good Discord server should: * Onboard new users to the Discord * Be inclusive & welcoming to all personas * Be clear on where to talk about what * Have an encouraging and safe culture ### Current | Section | Name | Type | Remarks | |:----------------- | ------------------ | --------------- | ------- | | Official | Announcements | Restricted Chat | | | Official | General | Open Chat | | | Official | Trading | Open Chat | | | Official | Rules | Restricted Chat | | | Official | Scam Alert | Open Chat | | | Technical | Developers | Open Chat | | | Technical | Bugs | Open Chat | | | Technical | Metanode-Operators | Open Chat | | | Local Communities | Sri-Lanka | Open Chat | | | Local Communities | Spanish | Open Chat | | | Local Communities | Portugese | Open Chat | | | Local Communities | Vietnamese | Open Chat | | | Local Communities | Poland | Open Chat | | | Local Communities | Romania | Open Chat | | | Voice | Voice | Voice Chat | | * Too tech focused * Doesn't onboard new people ### Proposed * Open up to general audiences, before narrowing down to task-based flows * Add onboarding & information information and flows for new users (i.e. `Welcome` and `Resources` and `FAQ`) * Absorbed not so useful flows (e.g. `Rules` & `Scam Alert`) & converted some channels (`Developers`, `Bugs`) | Section | Name | Type | Remarks | |:------------- | ------------- | --------------- | ------------------------------------------ | | Swingby | Welcome | Open Chat | NEW - What is Swingby, rules & channels | | Swingby | Announcements | Restricted Chat | Announcements | | Swingby | Resources | Restricted Chat | NEW - Resources to read up | | Discussion | General | Open Chat | General discussions | | Discussion | Trading | Open Chat | Trading discussions | | Discussion | Testnet | Open Chat | Testnet discussions | | Discussion | Developer | Open Chat | Tech discussions. PREV: `Developers` | | Discussion | Did A Thing | Open Chat | ==Gradually in the coming weesks== | | Support | FAQ | Restricted Chat | NEW - FAQ | | Support | Support | Open Chat | General support. PREV: `Bugs` | | Support | Testnet | Open Chat | ==Gradually in the coming weesks== | | Support | Metanode | Open Chat | Support for Metanode operators. PREV: `Metanode-Operators` | | International | Sri-Lanka | Open Chat | | | International | Spanish | Open Chat | | | International | Portugese | Open Chat | | | International | Vietnamese | Open Chat | | | International | Poland | Open Chat | | | International | Romania | Open Chat | | | Voice | Voice | Voice Chat | | > Should we do it based on purpose? Or on user persona >* If each user persona has a lot, then split it based on user persona >* If each user persona does not have a lot, then split it based on purpose