---
title: Swingby Twitter & Discord Audit
tags: swingby, discord, twitter, audit
---
# Swingby Twitter & Discord Audit
## Twitter
==TBD==
## Discord
### Factors
A good Discord server should:
* Onboard new users to the Discord
* Be inclusive & welcoming to all personas
* Be clear on where to talk about what
* Have an encouraging and safe culture
### Current
| Section | Name | Type | Remarks |
|:----------------- | ------------------ | --------------- | ------- |
| Official | Announcements | Restricted Chat | |
| Official | General | Open Chat | |
| Official | Trading | Open Chat | |
| Official | Rules | Restricted Chat | |
| Official | Scam Alert | Open Chat | |
| Technical | Developers | Open Chat | |
| Technical | Bugs | Open Chat | |
| Technical | Metanode-Operators | Open Chat | |
| Local Communities | Sri-Lanka | Open Chat | |
| Local Communities | Spanish | Open Chat | |
| Local Communities | Portugese | Open Chat | |
| Local Communities | Vietnamese | Open Chat | |
| Local Communities | Poland | Open Chat | |
| Local Communities | Romania | Open Chat | |
| Voice | Voice | Voice Chat | |
* Too tech focused
* Doesn't onboard new people
### Proposed
* Open up to general audiences, before narrowing down to task-based flows
* Add onboarding & information information and flows for new users (i.e. `Welcome` and `Resources` and `FAQ`)
* Absorbed not so useful flows (e.g. `Rules` & `Scam Alert`) & converted some channels (`Developers`, `Bugs`)
| Section | Name | Type | Remarks |
|:------------- | ------------- | --------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
| Swingby | Welcome | Open Chat | NEW - What is Swingby, rules & channels |
| Swingby | Announcements | Restricted Chat | Announcements |
| Swingby | Resources | Restricted Chat | NEW - Resources to read up |
| Discussion | General | Open Chat | General discussions |
| Discussion | Trading | Open Chat | Trading discussions |
| Discussion | Testnet | Open Chat | Testnet discussions |
| Discussion | Developer | Open Chat | Tech discussions. PREV: `Developers` |
| Discussion | Did A Thing | Open Chat | ==Gradually in the coming weesks== |
| Support | FAQ | Restricted Chat | NEW - FAQ |
| Support | Support | Open Chat | General support. PREV: `Bugs` |
| Support | Testnet | Open Chat | ==Gradually in the coming weesks== |
| Support | Metanode | Open Chat | Support for Metanode operators. PREV: `Metanode-Operators` |
| International | Sri-Lanka | Open Chat | |
| International | Spanish | Open Chat | |
| International | Portugese | Open Chat | |
| International | Vietnamese | Open Chat | |
| International | Poland | Open Chat | |
| International | Romania | Open Chat | |
| Voice | Voice | Voice Chat | |
> Should we do it based on purpose? Or on user persona
>* If each user persona has a lot, then split it based on user persona
>* If each user persona does not have a lot, then split it based on purpose