# ReproHack Review Questions

## Reproducibility
### Did you manage to reproduce it?*
 Fully Reproducible Partially Reproducible Not Reproducible 

### How much of the paper did you manage to reproduce?*

0 - 10

### Briefly describe the procedure followed/tools used to reproduce it.*

Markdown field

### Briefly describe your familiarity with the procedure/tools used by the paper.*

Markdown field

### Operating System
Which type of operating system were you working in?*
- Linux/FreeBSD or other Open Source Operating system 
- Apple Operating System (macOSX) 
- Windows Operating System 

### What operating system were you using (eg. Ubuntu 14.04.6 LTS, macOS 10.15 or Windows 10 Pro)?

### What additional software did you need to install?*

Markdown field

### What software did you use?*

Markdown field

### What were the main challenges you ran into (if any)?*

Markdown field

### What were the positive features of this approach?*

Markdown field

### Any other comments/suggestions on the reproducibility approach?

Markdown field

## Documentation
### How well was the material documented?*

0 - 10

### How could the documentation be improved?*

Markdown field

### What do you like about the documentation?*

Markdown field

### After attempting to reproduce, how familiar do you feel with the code and methods used in the paper?*

0 - 10

### Any suggestions on how the analysis could be made more transparent?

Markdown field

## Reusability

### Rate the project on reusability of the material.*

0 - 10

### Are materials clearly covered by a permissive enough license to build on?

- [ ] Permissive license for DATA included

- [ ] Permissive license for CODE included

### Any suggestions on how the project could be more reusable?

Markdown field

### Any final comments?

Markdown field