Try   HackMD

Implementing a full TCP/IP stack on FPGAs is challenging but offers ultra-low latency and high throughput advantages for networking applications. Here's how it's done:

Image Not Showing Possible Reasons
  • The image was uploaded to a note which you don't have access to
  • The note which the image was originally uploaded to has been deleted
Learn More →

1. TCP/IP Stack Layers & FPGA Implementation Approaches

Image Not Showing Possible Reasons
  • The image was uploaded to a note which you don't have access to
  • The note which the image was originally uploaded to has been deleted
Learn More →

2. Key Implementation Methods
A. Full Hardware Implementation

  • Pros: Nanosecond latency, deterministic timing
  • Cons: High LUT/FF usage, limited flexibility
  • Example Architecture:
verilog
module tcp_engine (
  input wire clk,
  input wire [31:0] ip_packet,
  output wire [31:0] tcp_segment
);
  // Connection tracking
  reg [15:0] src_port, dst_port;
  reg [31:0] seq_num, ack_num;
  
  // Finite State Machine
  always @(posedge clk) begin
    case(state)
      SYN_RCVD: begin ... end
      ESTABLISHED: begin ... end
    endcase
  end
endmodule

B. Hybrid CPU+FPGA (SoC)

  • Pros: Flexible (Linux stack for control plane)

  • Cons: Higher latency for data plane

  • Example:

    • Zynq UltraScale+: PS runs Linux TCP/IP, PL handles packet filtering
    • Intel SoC FPGA: Nios II soft-core manages ARP while FPGA does MAC

C. P4-NetFPGA Pipeline

  • Pros: Reconfigurable packet processing
  • Cons: Limited TCP statefulness
  • Toolflow:
text
P4 Program → P4 Compiler → FPGA Bitstream

3. Critical Optimization Techniques
A. Checksum Offload Engine

verilog
module checksum_16 (
  input wire [15:0] data,
  output reg [15:0] sum
);
  always @(*) begin
    sum = sum + data;
    if (sum[16]) sum = sum + 1; // Carry wrap
  end
endmodule

B. Zero-Copy DMA Architecture

  • AXI Stream between MAC and TCP engine
  • Ring buffers in Block RAM

C. Window Scaling & Retransmission

  • BRAM-based sequence number tracking
  • Hardware timers for RTO calculation

4. Resource Utilization (Xilinx VU9P)

Image Not Showing Possible Reasons
  • The image was uploaded to a note which you don't have access to
  • The note which the image was originally uploaded to has been deleted
Learn More →

5. Performance Benchmarks

Image Not Showing Possible Reasons
  • The image was uploaded to a note which you don't have access to
  • The note which the image was originally uploaded to has been deleted
Learn More →

6. Use Cases

  • High-Frequency Trading: TCP acceleration for market data
  • 5G UPF: User Plane Function offload
  • SmartNICs: Microsoft Catapult, AWS Nitro
  • Industrial IoT: Deterministic industrial protocols

7. Challenges

  • TCP State Bloat: 1M connections needs ~32MB RAM
  • Security: SYN flood protection in hardware
  • Standards Compliance: RFC 793+1323+2018+7413

8. Tools & IP Cores

  • Xilinx: 100G TCP/IP Offload Engine
  • Intel: Partial Reconfigurable Nios Stack
  • Open Source: LiteEth, FPro

For production systems, most teams combine:

  1. Hardware-accelerated data path (FPGA)
  2. Software control plane (Linux on ARM/x86)