# REPORT ON THE RESULTS OBTAINED FROM THE EXPERIMENT (MULTI MICROPHONE METHOD) ## REPORT OF THE ABSOLUTE CALIBRATION * For the absolute calibration we require acoustic calibrator (MODEL-CAL200) and the microphone is gently inserted into the acoustic calibrator for the calibration * Output level of the calibrator = $94$ (or) $114 dB$ - tolerance(+- $0.2dB$) at $1KHz$ (+-1% tolerance) frequency * we have performed two cases for the absolute calibration - Nominal level 114 dB with signal generated from the calibration (near distance) - Nominal level 114 dB with signal generated from the calibration (far distance) - Near distance means the calibrator is kept nearer to the apparatus i.e, DAQ, Signal conditioner, test rig and far distance the calibrator is kept at far distance from the apparatus ### Nominal level 114 dB with signal generated from the calibration (far distance) * Output level | Nominal level| rms pressure | Test result | Lower limit | upper limit | lying in the range | result | | -------- | -------- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 114 dB | 9.0182 Pa | 113.818dB | 113.80dB |114.20dB | yes | pass | * Frequency | Nominal level| rms pressure | Test result | Lower limit | upper limit | lying in the range | result | | -------- | -------- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 114 dB | 9.0182 Pa | 1000.58Hz | 990 Hz |1010 Hz | yes | pass | * plot of pressure-time domain - For the time interval 50sec to 90sec the p-t graph is constant, it is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/f8BaQyS.jpg) * The graph of pressure frequency domain after doing fft ![](https://i.imgur.com/7NO8g4A.jpg) * phase plot for the time interval is shown as below (degrees) ![](https://i.imgur.com/8A1pQUp.jpg) ### Nominal level 114 dB with signal generated from the calibration (near distance) * Output | Nominal level| rms pressure | Test result | Lower limit | upper limit | lying in the range | result | | -------- | -------- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 114 dB | 10.6195Pa | 114.05014dB | 113.80dB |114.20dB | yes | pass | * Frequency | Nominal level| rms pressure | Test result | Lower limit | upper limit | lying in the range | result | | -------- | -------- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 114 dB | 10.6195Pa| 1000.59Hz | 990Hz |1010Hz | yes | pass | * plot of pressure-time domain - For the time interval 10sec to 40sec the p-t graph is constant, it is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/40LGFP5.jpg) * The graph of pressure frequency domain after doing fft ![](https://i.imgur.com/mbzo2j4.jpg) * phase plot for the time interval is shown as below (degrees) ![](https://i.imgur.com/M2QNe6B.jpg) ## RELATIVE CALIBRATION OF MICROPHONES ### RESULTS OBTAINED * We have done three cases for the relative calibration i.e, three types of signals were given to the speaker - sine wave with amplitude 2mV, frequency 200Hz and time 100sec - chirp signal with amplitude 1mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 100sec - chirp signal with amplitude 2mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 100sec ### sine wave with amplitude 2mV, frequency 200Hz and time of 100sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones which includes absolutely calibrated microphone is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/2oOqnip.jpg) * the pressure time series data of the five microphones with time shown upto 1sec in the box. ![](https://i.imgur.com/LkZjZCb.jpg) * the pressure time series data of the five microphones with time shown upto 5sec in the box. ![](https://i.imgur.com/BjjiEnX.jpg) * the pressure frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/vKKHp8Z.jpg) * the detailed view of pressure frequency domain for the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/j9QNeuo.jpg) * rms value of pressures of the microphones are shown below | rms value of the pressure | value | | ----------- | ----------- | | rms voltage of input signal | $\sqrt2$ mV | absolutely calibrated | $5.0945$ Pa | | microphone 1 | $4.3759$ Pa| | microphone 2 | $3.8967$ Pa | | microphone 3 | $6.2414$ Pa | | microphone 4 | $4.2038$ Pa | ### chirp signal with amplitude 1mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 100sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones which includes absolutely calibrated microphone is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/QwSROm5.jpg) * the pressure time series data of the five microphones with time shown upto 1sec in the box ![](https://i.imgur.com/uKKZkiw.jpg) * the pressure time series data of the five microphones with time shown upto 5sec in the box ![](https://i.imgur.com/92mVwKB.jpg) * the pressure frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/IM8wX9E.jpg) * the detailed view of pressure frequency domain for the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/l6ilFaB.jpg) * rms value of pressures of the microphones are shown below | rms value of the pressure | value | | ----------- | ----------- | | rms voltage of input signal | $0.7053$ mV | absolutely calibrated | $2.4462$ Pa | | microphone 1 | $2.7339$ Pa| | microphone 2 | $2.7433$ Pa | | microphone 3 | $3.0999$ Pa | | microphone 4 | $3.2027$ Pa | ### chirp signal with amplitude 2mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 100sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones which includes absolutely calibrated microphone is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/nEEa8Dg.jpg) * the pressure time series data of the five microphones with time shown upto 1sec in the box ![](https://i.imgur.com/PE6JD94.jpg) * the pressure time series data of the five microphones with time shown upto 5sec in the box ![](https://i.imgur.com/aUUJgn5.jpg) * the pressure frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/pls7b86.jpg) * the detailed view of pressure frequency domain for the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/0vCaFGI.jpg) * rms value of pressures of the microphones are shown below | rms value of the pressure | value | | ----------- | ----------- | | rms voltage of input signal | $\sqrt2$ mV | absolutely calibrated | $3.1395$ Pa | | microphone 1 | $3.5455$ Pa| | microphone 2 | $3.5019$ Pa | | microphone 3 | $3.6339$ Pa | | microphone 4 | $3.9622$ Pa | ### Calibration coefficients of microphones with respect to absolutely calibrated microphone #### Chirp signal with amplitude 1mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 100sec * magnitude of pressure with respect to absolutely calibrated microphone ($\frac{p_{ref}}{p_j}$) ![](https://i.imgur.com/l16O7MV.jpg) * magnitude of phase with respect to absolutely calibrated microphone ($\phi_{ref}$-$\phi_{j}$) ![](https://i.imgur.com/7BNqiGE.jpg) #### Chirp signal with amplitude 2mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 100sec * magnitude of pressure with respect to absolutely calibrated microphone ($\frac{p_{ref}}{p_j}$) ![](https://i.imgur.com/yXLO874.jpg) * magnitude of phase with respect to absolutely calibrated microphone ($\phi_{ref}$-$\phi_{j}$) ![](https://i.imgur.com/IcQxF3E.jpg) ## RESULTS OF THE TEST RIG USING MMM (MULTI MICROPHONE METHOD) * The microphones are kept at axial locations as follows $x_1$ = 220mm $x_2$ = 380mm $x_3$ = 510mm $x_4$ = 620mm $x_5$ = 700mm (all the distances are measured from the source i.e, speaker) * The tube (test rig) is of length $1mm$ ### WITH FOAM AT SPEAKER END #### Chirp signal with amplitude 1mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 50sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/FoSokD2.jpg) * the frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/8Ox03aU.jpg) * the plot of the reflection coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/IWWunQH.jpg) * the plot of the absorption coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/9A58NfM.jpg) * the plot of the real and imaginary part of impedance vs frequency range at the open end i.e, at $x=0$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/1VXEUN4.jpg) * the plot of pressure along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/uPFtJZn.jpg) * the plot of velocity along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/VGQG7ua.jpg) #### Chirp signal with amplitude 2mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 50sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/4JeJXKj.jpg) * the frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/biFFgU1.jpg) * the plot of the reflection coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/Ul6mHeN.jpg) * the plot of the absorption coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/uZpKJW4.jpg) * the plot of the real and imaginary part of impedance vs frequency range at the open end i.e, at $x=0$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/xn4EPLG.jpg) * the plot of pressure along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/FK7WqFF.jpg) * the plot of velocity along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/lLFffVz.jpg) #### Chirp signal with amplitude 3mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 50sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/oWgct9R.jpg) * the frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/Uiq93Em.jpg) * the plot of the reflection coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/vrZxsTz.jpg) * the plot of the absorption coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/OuzyERU.jpg) * the plot of the real and imaginary part of impedance vs frequency range at the open end i.e, at $x=0$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/hLrvpMZ.jpg) * the plot of pressure along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/bccFQGa.jpg) * the plot of velocity along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/XHosLUu.jpg) ### WITH OUT FOAM AT SPEAKER END #### Chirp signal with amplitude 1mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 50sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/2aQ7Wts.jpg) * the frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/oWjNdNZ.jpg) * the plot of the reflection coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/WKbqngF.jpg) * the plot of the absorption coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/kuAZvr8.jpg) * the plot of the real and imaginary part of impedance vs frequency range at the open end i.e, at $x=0$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/ztTOssk.jpg) * the plot of pressure along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/W97w9Tu.jpg) * the plot of velocity along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/BIOHUAN.jpg) #### Chirp signal with amplitude 2mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 50sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/XyRfckV.jpg) * the frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/P6GKUyf.jpg) * the plot of the reflection coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/4fF7PXJ.jpg) * the plot of the absorption coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/2i7vax0.jpg) * the plot of the real and imaginary part of impedance vs frequency range at the open end i.e, at $x=0$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/cxofTYH.jpg) * the plot of pressure along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/WGlBxaM.jpg) * the plot of velocity along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/AaCuElh.jpg) #### Chirp signal with amplitude 3mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 50sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/l89IMp9.jpg) * the frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/Mg8RxLF.jpg) * the plot of the reflection coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/O12A2dB.jpg) * the plot of the absorption coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/oHqn7Ew.jpg) * the plot of the real and imaginary part of impedance vs frequency range at the open end i.e, at $x=0$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/Pvkjiu9.jpg) * the plot of pressure along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/2zQL02Y.jpg) * the plot of velocity along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/MUvbkAE.jpg) #### Chirp signal with amplitude 4mV, frequency from 250Hz-2500Hz and time 50sec * the pressure time series data of the 5 microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/wbJSVf8.jpg) * the frequency domain of the five microphones is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/xBV5MC1.jpg) * the plot of the reflection coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/V8TaL5P.jpg) * the plot of the absorption coefficient vs frequency range i.e, 250Hz-2500Hz is shown below ![](https://i.imgur.com/hBNvhBz.jpg) * the plot of the real and imaginary part of impedance vs frequency range at the open end i.e, at $x=0$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/H0GtkiS.jpg) * the plot of pressure along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/iNoWiYi.jpg) * the plot of velocity along the length of tube for time interval of $t=0-50sec$ with a step of $t=10sec$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/VE0M2jL.jpg)