Proponent: Ordum [DaUR7Puu8u3PRw1Xha1in2s55bYXmbv4tX8ETe4gfvXEd32]  Date: 12.12.2022.  Requested KSM: 78,804 USD (allocation in KSM will be calculated on the day of submission using EMA7 rate - https://kusama.subscan.io/tools/charts?type=price) Short description: Ordum is a public good grants aggregator for the Polkadot and Kusama ecosystems. This proposal addresses the funding of R&D. 1. Context of the proposal: we aim to have as much context as possible to understand how a proposal came to the proponent's mind, Please include here: a. Any points discussed in advance in any channel related to the proposal and background research for your project.

How often do you vote? What mostly influences your voting decision? What do you like/dislike about the current treasury process(GOV1 and GOV2)? What are the biggest problems we should help the community resolve in regards to grants applications and transparent funding? Would you like to be able to vote and/or award grants through an Ordum UI or would you prefer to do this via Subsquare / Polkassembly? What would you like to see in the tl;dr / summary section of a proposal? How do we increase relevance of both proposals and voters? Should votes be explained, regardless of their direction? How do you evaluate the credibility of an applicant? What should be displayed on the profile of the Kusama Treasury? Eg. Application process, criteria etc. How do we bring voting closer to the average user and how do we make more token holders aware of the existence of gov2?

22nd of March // Dinner Event after the AngelHack DOT Hackathon Audience: builders and business Next steps [ ] Confirm Teams [ ] Touch base with Angel Hack to define the event

Font still showing outline instead of fill White stroke on button -> to remove Graphic shouldn't be cut off (this is my fault I guess? xD) spacing too large between cards icons should be white bigger spacing on the edges of the cards img and txt in cards not aligned

What kind of grants programs do you have (eg. "normal" such as web3 foundation grants, treasury, tips, bounties, bug bounties, educational...)? Up to how much funding do you give per project? What kind of projects would you like to fund (eg. infra, wallets, defi...)? Where does friction occur in your grants process? Would you like to receive more or less applications? How relevant are the proposals submitted from the teams? Do the proposers often missunderstand something about the grant application process? If so then, what? What are your evaluation factors? What mainly influences your decision to grant funding? Which criteria do you use to evaluate a submitted proposal?

How many grants have you applied for? How many were approved/denied? What types of grants did you apply for? Where did friction occur during the application process? What did you like about the process? What did you dislike about the process? How would you prefer to log into a grant dapp? Multisig? Normal wallet? DIDs? All of these? As an applicant, what would you like to see grant issuers display on their profile (eg. application process/rules, projects of interest, total funding issued/left...)? what kind of categorisation and filtering could help find grants more easily? what kind of credibility does the foundation need to have for your team to apply for funding? What sort of activities would you like to see on your home dashboard? Submission deadlines, notifications regarding your proposal (new comments, reviews...)?

Market Type 1 [this part I get, it's added for context purposes] Consider a simple market where one can bet on the event D, i.e., the Democratic party wins the 2008 U.S. presidential election. In such a market a bank could without risk accept $1 in payment for the pair of contingent assets, “Pays $1 if D” and “Pays $1 if not D.” This transaction carries no risk because exactly one of these assets will be worth $1 in the end. Since the expected dollar value of the asset “Pays $1 if D” is $p(D), if someone is willing to buy this asset for $0.70, we can interpret this willingness as this person saying that the chance that Democrats will win is at least 70%. And a market price of $0.70 can be interpreted as a consensus among potential traders that p(D) ≈ 70%.3 After averaging in their minds over plausible scenarios, traders would have judged that Democrats win in about 70% of such cenarios. Market Type 2 Now imagine a market like the one above, where people can trade an asset like “Pays $1 if D” for some fraction of $1, but where such trades are called off unless there is also the event C, i.e., Hillary Clinton is the nominee of the Democratic party in the 2008 election. When a trade is called off, the exchange does not happen, and each side instead retains their original assets. Traders thinking about the prices they are willing to accept here should again average over plausible scenarios, but this time they should only consider scenarios consistent with the event

I will step down from CC committee due to lack of time. I would love to keep liking up CC with events in DOT, please make a similar table as per example with the members and I can keep you folks in the loop. Member Name Contact Music(eg. Soundcloud, Spotify) Availability Continent/Country NFT links