Meeting agenda, notes and actions for 2024-09-25 at 12 noon ET

Organizer
: Daniel Wheeler

Attendees
: - Daniel Wheeler (he/him)
- David Montiel (he/him)
- Zachary Trautt (he/him)
- Please add your name

## Links

- [Google Meet][meet]
- [WG GitHub repository][repo]
- [Google Docs][docs]
- [Previous meeting notes][previous]
- [Proposal document][proposal]
- [Resource links][resources]
- [Overleaf publication][overleaf]

## Agenda

1. Any questions or items to raise for discussion (please add)
3. Reminders
- Next WG meet
- 2024-10-30, Wednesday, 12-noon ET
4. Meetings:
- Meeting with Hafiz Noman (2024-09-11)
- Discuss role
- Importance of WR RO-Crate
- Try and create WR RO-Crate with a phase field example
- Why problem spec is important
- Help with ontology for DefinedTerms
- Meeting with Marvin Tegeler (2024-09-18)
- Some misconceptions about how RO-Crate worked
- Actions from this meeting
- Move the RO-Crate example to GitHub
- Document it and provide test cases
- include isBasedOn field as problem spec
- include some DefinedTerms
- Meeting with David Montiel (2024-09-04)
- Cleared up some issues with how the RO-Crate example worked
- Why is there an initial YAML file
- What does the code do?
7. Where are we?
- ro-crate example
- [gist](https://gist.github.com/wd15/4baf6e83aef80ff48af0535f2c8262be)
- [html view](https://html-preview.github.io/?url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/wd15/4baf6e83aef80ff48af0535f2c8262be/raw/7113e0cd239fc3199040078e8784eb0d2f657a44/ro-crate-preview.html)
- [graph view](https://json-ld.org/playground/#startTab=tab-expanded&json-ld=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.githubusercontent.com%2Fwd15%2F4baf6e83aef80ff48af0535f2c8262be%2Fraw%2Fd49c12b4a4bbcd9397bcae42848b5df989b879f6%2Fro-crate-metadata.json)
- [Some explanation](https://www.researchobject.org/workflow-run-crate/profiles/0.5/process_run_crate/)
- [update schema](https://github.com/ResearchObject/ro-terms/)
- [Glossary of phase field terms](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vwmF9US-_MEiattgZcQ0sQ6SGsZVMZDRb3LrknnZTlU/edit?usp=sharing)
8. What next?
- I think we need to think about adding a `specification` or `problemDefinition` field to the top-level of the exisisting RO-Crate terms.
- Needs to be proposed to the [Workflow Run RO-Crate group](https://www.researchobject.org/workflow-run-crate/)
- Will attend meeting tomorrow and raise this issue
- Generate FiPy RO-Crate example
- Generate PRISMS-PF RO-Crate example
- Generate OpenPhase RO-Crate example
- Hafiz example?
- Upload to workflow hub?

## Notes

<!-- links -->

[meet]: https://meet.google.com/bas-vkxi-rmq
[repo]: https://github.com/marda-alliance/phase-field-schema
[docs]: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1zhUi3A-CXxrkh4gTkLVUOncdqAMIAXND
[previous]: https://github.com/marda-alliance/phase-field-schema/blob/main/meeting-minutes/meet-012_2024-08-28.md
[proposal]: https://github.com/marda-alliance/phase-field-schema/blob/main/proposal.md
[resources]: https://github.com/marda-alliance/phase-field-schema/discussions/5
[overleaf]: https://www.overleaf.com/project/663e34cc1c8095115e0de913