---
# System prepended metadata

title: HydraDX OmniPool Course Research Topic

---

# HydraDX OmniPool Course Research Topic


### Research Topic/Question:
#### Are the current "efficiency innovations" like less Impermanent Loss, less Slippage, Better Returns for LPs under OMNIPOOL AMM **"enough"** for HydraDX to compete with current establised protocols like Uniswap?

#### How can HydraDX grow their userbase, and possibly disrupt some protocols?




---
### Brief Description:

#### A question of innovation, growth, marketing and branding.
It is very important that we along with making better user products, and innovating on the technical side, to better come up with SCALING strategies, and actually thinking about how HydraDX can compete with established protocols like Uniswap, and Balancer. 

And very importantly not to "ignore" the business side.

Under this research question, I/We propose to thoroughly research to answer this question. 



---
### Expected Approach

* Researching about "Disruption Innovation", "Innovator's and Capitalist Dilemma" and studying the works of renowned people like Clay Christensen, Eric Ries.
* Researching and  talking to the people in Web3 industry, studying and making Case Studies, on how to best reach more users.




---
### Team Members (initial)

#### Amanjot Singh
Working as student intern in edyst.com (YC-19). 

And working on an idea related to "Metaverse Advertising" (happy to discuss on this btw)


---
### Attainable Goal/Specific Objective (may be/likely to be achieved during the course)

#### Clear objective to answer these questions, and hopefully come up with better plans to help HydraDX reach their vision :)  