---
# System prepended metadata

title: DAO Governance

---



**Purpose**: Safeguard the DAO’s Governance processes & social layer by protecting against & disincentivizing infiltration & manipulation.


What we need is both preventative & responsive code infrastructure which decentralizes away from social threat vectors through automation; that is battle tested; & fill needs.

What currently comes to mind for me:

1. Framework & tools for consensus building, including dispute resolution. Scope: Core & SubDAOs
a. Aiki Wiki. Process: Demo availabile


2. SubDAO Builds
a. Moloch V3 
  Process: Bootleggers twitter.com/0xBootleggers


3.  Composable Roles.  Scope: Core & Sub
a. Hats Protocol
b. Gnosis Guild
Hats<>Zodiac https://x.com/auryn_macmillan/status/1758215743655858509?s=20

  
3. Identity. Scope: Opt-in
a. Sismo. Zk digital identities, reputation system, lots more.
   Process: Available yet on Eth?
  
  

4. DAO2DAO Infra. Core/Sub
a. Inverter Network. D2D & funder coordination including tracking investee/grantee progress


![priorities matrix](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/SkgPykZ2a.png)



**Background Research**
[Capture resistant governance](https://spengrah.mirror.xyz/f6bZ6cPxJpP-4K_NB7JcjbU0XblJcaf7kVLD75dOYRQ) - Perhaps a framework like this is necessary, but not sufficient, for governance. 

Be able to ask ‘what is required for truly sovereign decentralized community formation over time’ and then read something with that design space in mind.
