# Ideas

## 04/04/2023

Brainstorming questions for the survey

INTRO:
- Introducir Global North y Global South
- communities of practice define: LA-CoNGA, Metadocencia, The Turing Way
- Context, next steps
- Herramienta general: https://www.bikeprinciples.org

### Demographic section
* Name
* Email
* Affiliation/institution
* Position?
* Maybe carreer stage?
* Region
* Age group? Gender? -> Would these be interesting stats to have?

* Select which of this statements describes better your situation (Multiple selection?)
* I come from the Global South and I currently work in the Global North
* I come from and mostly work in the Global North
* I come from and mostly work in the Global South

* Select which of this statements describes your interest better (Multiple selection?)
* I work in projects that follow open science principles involving stakeholders mostly in the Global North
* I work in projects that follow open science principles involving stakeholders mostly in the Global South
* I work in projects that follow open science principles involving partners from both: Global North and South
* None of the above, but I am interested in the topic

### The concept of Open Science

* How would you define Open Science? OPEN QUESTION
* Do you consider this definition of Open Science global and applicable everywhere by everyone? Please justify OPEN QUESTION
* Which of the following aspects are part of Open Science?
* Open access to scientific journals
* Open access to data
* Open software
* Open hardware/infrastructures
* Open access to educational resources
* Open evaluation
* Science outreach and communicatio
* Citizen science
* Anything else we might want to add?

### Understanding better Open Science collaboration projects

* In your experience, what benefits do you think Open Science can bring to your work/research field? Top 3 (multiple selection? Add priorities?)
* Word cloud
* Do you have any concerns about the possible negative impacts of Open Science practices in your work/research field? Top 3
* Word cloud

* In your experience, what are the main barriers/challenges you have faced in your Open Science communities of practice? Top 3 (Word cloud)
* Lack of recognition in my institution
* Access to computational resources
* Access to high-speed internet
* Language
* NEED TO ADD MORE OPTIONS
* "Open option"

### Collaborations north-south (or collaborations in general?)

* In your experience, which of the following activities (options?) made the collaboration easier?

In the context of collaborative projects that follow open science principles, share your top 3 practices for a productive collaboration?
*
* Translating material/resources
* Any other best practice you recommend?OPEN OPTION

*

### Contribution to mapping

* Do you know some projects/initiatives/programs/institutions working on Open Science collaborative projects in the Global South? Please name them! Shout out :)

## 28/03/2023

Audiencia: Los siguientes grupos:
1. Gente de Europa/UK interesada en el tema, ¿tal vez trabajando en proyectos relacionados con ciencia abierta con países en el sur?
2. Diaspora del sur que está trabajando en Europa/UK, ¿tal vez trabajando en proyectos relacionados con ciencia abierta en colaboración con sus países de origen?
3. Gente actualmente en el Sur Global trabajando en el tema: esto en caso de que logremos atraerlos a conectarse remotamente

Lo cual nos deja algunos temas interesantes a a tratar en el mini-workshop que pueden complementar otros proyectos andando (como el mapeo en Latam que mencionaba Nicolás):

1. La definición de Ciencia Abierta desde ambas perspectivas: universalidad y localización del concepto

* Qué cuestiones en particular se tratarían
* Qué entiende la gente por "Open"
* De estos temas, cuáles consideras que son "Open science"
* Por ejemplo, estos son temas interesantes para abordar?
* Revistas open access en las que resulta imposible el pago;
* Quién posee propiedad de esos repositorios open access;
* Compartir el uso de recursos computacionales pero limitado por ejemplo a membresía institucional;
* Buenas intenciones que se frenan por barreras de acceso (por ejemplo, compartir material sólo en inglés).

3. Cooperación: comprensión de las realidades en ambos lados, barreras en la cooperación, buenas prácticas

* Qué traemos a la mesa en el Sur que no tengan en el Norte.
* Cómo ayudarnos a tomar parte en mesas de decisión del Norte y por qué es necesario.
* También, qué inconvenientes ven en el Norte para hacerlo.
* Cuáles son las barreras
* Cuáles son las cosas que facilitan la colaboración
* Identificar buenas prácticas

Podemos pensar en tener preguntas con enfoques ligeramente distintos dependiendo del grupo con el cual se identifiquen los/as participantes

4. ¿Se podrían organizar mini-workshops en comunidades interesadas?

Encuesta:

- Formulario google
- Usar encuesta de metadocencia como inspiración inicial
- Revisitar preguntas de este formulatio para entender practicas que incentivan colaboración y barreras que la limitan https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/questionnaire_unesco_open_science_en.pdf
- Appel mondial de l'UNESCO pour partager les meilleures pratiques en matière de science ouverte: https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=Uq5PHbM5-kuwswIpVrERlFtomJyhGNxAj5kDjhIGW4ZUNFlRQzhVRkNOR1FBMDhKOEhCTUFTOVVVVC4u
- Mapeo de otros proyectos: nombra otras comunidades

-----------

# CW23 - Communities of practice and the pursue for Open science on a global scale

## Mini-workshop or demo session abstract
*If your session is accepted this abstract will be made public on the CW23 website, so please write this as a public description containing 200-400 words.*

Are the current concepts and practices around Open Science global and universal? This mini-workshop will offer a meeting point to discuss views and practical experiences from those who work in open science spaces to understand their impact in different regions.

Openness aims to support reproducibility, efficiency and better quality science, increased collaboration, and engagement between research and society that can lead to higher social and economic impacts of public research. But openness is highly situational, contingent and dependent on the privileges and local context of knowledge makers and gatekeepers.

Three communities of practices interested in the intersectionality of the concepts and practices currently used in open science get together to prepare this miniworkshop: LA-CoNGA physics, Metadocencia and The Turing Way. We would like to invite a diverse range of people (researchers, policy makers, and open science enthusiasts) working across various geographical regions to participate in an interactive survey pilot and facilitated discussion around the pursue for Open science on a global scale. The aim of the session will be to better understand the current barriers, successful practices and possible improvements needed for the implementation of Open Science outside of Europe and North America for, and how current policies may or may not align with various community best practices.

Understanding the current barriers, successful practices and possible improvements needed for the implementation of Open Science on a global scale is fundamental to ensure the sustainable career development of the researchers from and/or working in regions non traditionally represented in the usual open science forums.

The outcome of the session will be used as the basis for a survey project we want to do with open science actors in Latin America.

## Mini-workshop or demo session audience
*If your session is accepted this description of the intended audience for this session will be made public on the CW23 website to help participants choose which sessions to attend. Please include any prerequisites for participants, expected prior knowledge/skills needed, if any software/tools need to be installed prior to the session, or if there is a maximum/expected number of participants if necessary.*

This session will be relevant for all people (researchers, policy makers, and open science enthusiasts) interested in the intersectionality of the open science concept and practices. In particular people coming from and/or working in the Global South are very welcome to join and share their experience.

## Mini-workshop or demo session description
*Please describe your session's aims and outcomes, how the session connects to the themes of CW23, how the session will run (tentative format/agenda), and how the session will be inclusive of both in-person and remote participants. If you are proposing a 60-minute session, please outline how you plan to facilitate active participant engagement/interaction with both in-person and remote participants.*

We expect that the attendess of the CW23 event to be diverse and international.
The aim of this miniworkshop is to offer a meeting point to discuss views and practical experiences from those who work in open science spaces to understand their impact in different regions.

Agenda:
- 10' introduction: context, explain the dynamic of the miniworkshop, etc
- 10' Interactive survey pilot
- 10' Feedback time about points not covered by the survey pilot

Zoom will be available for people connecting remotely, as well as English captions. Our moderators will be mindful to include remote participants in the discussion. The agenda, workshop strategy and notes will be made available in advance and will remain available after the workshop in case asyncronous participants wants to contribute to the discussion.

## Any special requirements or other information you would like to include about your proposed session?
*For example, will you need extra helpers provided or a specific technical setup? Will you need use of the CW23 Sli.do?*

We will benefit from using the CW23 Sli.do.
As well as support for captioning, if possible.