---
# System prepended metadata

title: UH Roadmap Meeting Notes
tags: [UberHaus]

---

---
###### tags: `UberHaus`
---

# UH Roadmap Meeting Notes

- MGD put up [a forum post](https://forum.daohaus.club/t/dao-grants-thread/1030/9?u=zcrypto) requesting a $10k grant:
    - UH might consider a grant committee. **Does UH distribute grants or is this a one-off case?**
        - Grants could be streamed regularly (ever few months)
        - What does a grant mean? What are the stipulations around that?
        - What are the criteria? 
        - How to avoid pure money grabs?
        - How does this feed value back into UH?
        - Reference to Panvala's fund-matching
    - For people that use Yeeter, we extend a retroactive reward.
        - A project starts a Yeeter
        - Ship their product
        - Analysis on the KPIs, evaluate the success
        - The UH grant committee would reward participants with HAUS
        - Allows us to source funds from a larger group of people
- Let's **Yeet the MGD grant**: Next steps:
    - We need some way to gauge if the campaign is successful: MGD should provide this
    - Need to bootstrap the grant committee
    - Fund some HAUS - $20k?
    - A typeform for someone that wants to start a Yeeter
    - Walk someone from MGD through this proposal
    - The grant committee itself needs to be funded: A yeeter for the grant committee? Streams are difficult to manage: we didn't track them and they drained the treasury.
- Define the structure of UH:
    - UberPaladins: Ops team, really boring stuff
    - We don't have a grant committee - let's bootstrap one. Giving away money.
    - [Jesters workstream](https://hackmd.io/@TravisWyche/UH-Unmarketing-Braindump-12-17-21): scope is being refined by TW
    - MetaGuides: reference Boilerrat + Jeremy over at MC
        - A DAO of mods, a service DAO of community engineers/facillitators
- Loot redistribution for members
    - If we restructured the DAO and excluded groups that do not participate that would free up HAUS for redistribution to other DAOs
    - As a retroactive bonus for participants in Yeeter
    - Airdropping the first time around didn't really work:
        - We didn't ask to be in a DAO
        - What does a federation of DAOs even mean?
        - How does the UH ecosystem benefit the participating DAOs? What is the benefit/incentive for participation?
        - The value of governance "mining" needs to be elaborated further
    - We need a retrospective
        - Why didn't governance mining work?
        - Why didn't the airdrop work?
        - Articulate clear metrics for how to design it differently?
- UH distributing grants that support ecosystem-wide initiatives, public goods, etc., then the value add is very clear. UH is composed of all the members.
- Regarding the Mainnet Raise:
    - A disconnect between UH and DH War Camp initiatives
    - Now: DH comes for money and there's no clear feedback or accountibility mechanism
    - War Camp is working on the roadmap so they can be held accountible for their actions