---
# System prepended metadata

title: Balancing Quality and Speed In Agile Software Development

---

# Balancing Quality and Speed In Agile Software Development

![](https://i.imgur.com/KgKCP21.jpg)

Agile software development techniques have come a long way in a short time. In the 2011 State of Agile Report, VersionOne, and Analysis Net Research set up that 80 percent of actors – all of whom were involved with software development to some degree – said their associations were rehearsing agile development. In the 2016 interpretation of this study, 95 percent were rehearsing agile.

Just about every decision-maker in this field has been completely induced that agile development is the way to go. There are a lot of benefits essential to agile. Arguably the biggest advantage? Speed. Compared to cascade, agile enables enterprises to develop and release software far more snappily and efficiently. still, there’s an issue then In numerous cases, businesses tend to emphasize speed so much that they end up overlooking and undervaluing quality. That’s a serious problem. As this infographic and blog make clear, there are major costs associated with poor software quality. It doesn’t have to be this way, however. With the right approach and the right agile testing tools, companies can take full advantage of agile’s speed without immolating quality. It’s all about striking the right balance.

To understand why so numerous businesses run into quality problems when using agile, you first need to consider software development precedence.
Speed isn’t inescapably the single biggest factor driving companies to move from cascade to agile, but it plays a significant part. Agile’s essential inflexibility and simultaneity allow systems to move from stage to stage in a far more effective manner than cascade’s severity and direct approach.
Speed has come decreasingly important for software development sweats in recent times. Gartner noted that “ CIOs are under pressure to support evolving digital business scripts but are chancing traditional design and development styles infelicitous. ” [agile software development](https://softdevlead.com/5-myths-regarding-agile-software-development-companies/) methodologies allow companies to respond to changing business conditions and take advantage of openings more snappily and effectively.

With that being the case, the unfortunate reality is that speed occasionally becomes too important of precedence – companies emphasize speed to the point that they make quality lower of a concern. This doesn’t mean they don’t watch about quality – just that it isn't put on par with speed. As a result, quality assurance isn't seen so much as an inestimable aspect of the agile development process, but rather as a tailback that can lead to detainments. Naturally, that dynamic can beget design leaders to push their brigades to deliver as snappily as possible and to spend lower time testing or indeed push testing to the coming release.

The result? Software is delivered by the deadline, but the quality’s not where it should be. And when companies release perambulator, poor-performing software, they can end up paying a veritably high price. Deadlines aren't as important as quality.

So does that mean that when it comes to agile, companies need to moreover choose speed or quality?

Not at each. In the simplest terms, there are two crucial ways that companies need to follow to strike the right balance then.

First, quality must be prioritized alongside speed. When you consider the costs of bugs, glitches, and crashes, this isn't a delicate argument to make. The benefits of a high-speed approach will be snappily negated by a low-quality software release. Second, associations need to invest in effective, easy-to-use agile testing tools and test case operation results. When these coffers are in place, testing becomes lower time- consuming and lower of a burden, while contemporaneously icing that any bugs are caught and handled beforehand. That speeds up the development process as a whole. That may feel like a simple remedy – and it is. The biggest challenge is that speed is important to agile success, but it’s not the be-all, end-all. Eventually, quality is going to have a big impact on the nethermost line.
