# Mumford and Shah functional ## Introduction Let $\Omega$ be a bounded set in $\mathbb{R}^2$, $K$ be the closed set in $\Omega$ $u_0 \in L^{\infty}(\Omega)$ be the raw image $u\in H^1(\Omega\setminus K)$ be the processed image, $u$ may have jump discontinuities on $K$ $$ F^{MS}(u,K) = \displaystyle\int_{\Omega\setminus K} (u-u_0)^2dx+\int_{\Omega\setminus K}|\nabla u|^2dx+\mathcal{H}(K) $$ Define $K$ as $S_u$ the set of jump discontinuities of $u$ $F^{MS}(u,K)$ becomes $$ F(u) = \displaystyle\int_{\Omega\setminus S_u} (u-u_0)^2dx+\int_{\Omega\setminus S_u}|\nabla u|^2dx+\mathcal{H}^1(S_u)\ $$ The goal is to find $u^{*} = \inf_{u\in SBV(\Omega)\cap L^{\infty}(\Omega)} F(u)$ --- ### BV space Consider that for $u \in L^{1}(\Omega)$, The space of bounded variation, $BV(\Omega) = \left\{u\in L^{1}(\Omega): \sup\left\{\displaystyle\int _{\Omega}u \mbox{div}\phi : C^{\infty}_c(\Omega), \hspace{5pt} ||\phi||_{L^{\infty}}\leq 1\right\}<\infty\right\}$ --- ### SBV space the measure $Du$ can be decomposed into two part (Lebesgue measure decomposition) $Du = D^{a.c}u+D^{s}u$ and $Du^{a.c}$ is the measure absolutely continuous with respect to $dx$ ($Du^{a.c}<<dx$) if $dx(E) = 0, D^{a.c}u(E) = 0$ $Du^s$ is the singular part with respect to $dx$ for existing $A, B$ disjoint and union be $\Omega$ , where $dx(A)=0, D^su(B)=0$ Moreover $D^su$ can further be decomposed into $D^ju+D^cu$ where $D^ju$ is the jump part, $D^c u$ is the Cantor part Consider that if $u\in BV(\Omega)$, the measure gradient $Du$ can be decomposed into $$ Du = D^{a.c}u+D^ju+D^cu $$ if $u\in SBV(\Omega)$, $D^cu(B) =0$ for all $B$ such that $\mathcal{H}^1(B)<\infty$ the total variation of $Du$ in $SBV$ space, $$ ||Du||(\Omega) =\displaystyle\int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|dx+\int_{S_u}|u^+-u^-|d\mathcal{H} $$ --- ### Compactness of SBV First we have $u_n\in SBV(\Omega)$ be a sequence of functions 1. $|u_n|\leq C$ for some $C<\infty$ a.e 2. $\displaystyle\int_{\Omega} |\nabla u_n|^2dx+\mathcal{H}^1(S_{u_n}) \leq C$ Then, 1. $\exists \left\{u_{n_k}\right\}\subset\left\{u_n\right\}$ $u_{n_k}\rightarrow u \in SBV$ a.e 2. $\nabla u_{n_k} \rightharpoonup\nabla u \in L^2(\Omega)^2$ 3. $\displaystyle\mathcal{H}(S_u)\leq\liminf_{n_k\rightarrow\infty}\mathcal{H}^1(S_{n_k})$ --- ### Lemma ![](https://i.imgur.com/YlE8GaD.png) --- ### Lemma #### Every Bounded Sequence in a $L^p$, $1<p<\infty$ Has a Weak Convergent Subsequence consider that $\left\{u_n\right\}$ be a bounded sequence in $L^2$ space Since $L^2$ is separable, given a sequence $\left\{\phi_n\right\}$ of functionals which are bounded in the dual space of $L^2$ Consider that $\phi_n(u_1)$ which is bounded in $\mathbb{R}$ therefore, we have a convergent subsequence, $\phi_{s(1,n)}(x_1)$ that converge to a real number $a_1$ Then we have a subsequence $\phi_{s(2,n)}(x_2)$ that converge to a real number $a_2$ Continuing the process, we can choose $n_k = s(k,k)$ such that $\phi_{s(k,k)}(x_m)$ that converge to $a_m$ Next, we want to show that $\phi_{n_k}\rightarrow\phi$ $$ |\phi_{n_k}(x)-\phi_{n_l}(x)|=|\phi_{n_k}(x)-\phi_{n_k}(x_N)+\phi_{n_k}(x_N)-\phi_{n_l}(x_N)+\phi_{n_l}(x_N)-\phi_{n_l}(x)|\\ \leq |\phi_{n_k}(x)-\phi_{n_k}(x_N)|+|\phi_{n_k}(x_N)-\phi_{n_l}(x_N)|+|\phi_{n_l}(x_N)-\phi_{n_l}(x)|\\ \leq 2M\epsilon+|\phi_{n_k}(x_N)-\phi_{n_l}(x_N)| $$ Therefore the sequence is cauchy, which will converge to some function $\phi$ in $L^2$. This shows the weak * converge. To sum up, if the space is separable and there is a sequence that is bounded above, there exists a weakly * convergence subsequence. By the discussion above, --- ## Existence of minimizer of $F(u)$ A functional admits it minima if and only if is obey the following conditions: 1. infimum should exists 2. $F$ is coercive 3. $F$ is lower semi-continuous The first condition prevent the functional has no infimum The second and the third are the key of the existence of minimizer. --- ### Coercivity $V = SBV(\Omega)\cap L^{\infty}(\Omega)$ If $F$ is coercive, meaning that $\displaystyle\lim_{||u||_V\rightarrow\infty}F(u) = +\infty$ This condition is to give a uniform bound on the minimizing sequence $\left\{u_n\right\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$. By the reflexivity of the space $V$, one can obtain a sebsequence $\left\{u_{n_k}\right\}_{k=1}^{\infty}\subset \left\{u_n\right\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$, such that $u_{n_k} \rightharpoonup \overline{u}$ in $V$. --- ### Lower semi-continuous The lower semi-continuous admits that $$ F(\overline{u})\leq \liminf_{k\rightarrow\infty}F(u_{n_k}) $$ Then $\overline{u}$ is the minimizer of $F(u)$ Proof of the Existence: 1. Take $u=0$, since $u_0\in L^{\infty}(\Omega)$ therefore, the functional is finite. 2. [Find a convergence subsequence, l.s.c] Consider for $\left\{u_n\right\}_{n=1}^{\infty}\subset V$ be a sequence such that $\displaystyle\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}F(u_n) = \inf_{u\in V} F(u)$. WLOG, $||u_n||_{\infty}\leq||g||_{\infty}$ , $\displaystyle \sup_{u_n\in V} F(u_n) < C$ for some $C<\infty$. Since $F(u_n)<C$, and $g\in L^{\infty}$, therefore $u_n\in L^2$ , and $\displaystyle\int_{\Omega\setminus S_u}|\nabla u_n|^2dx+\mathcal{H}^1(S_{u_n})<C$ By the compactness of SBV space, there exists a subsequence $u_{n_k}\rightarrow u\in SBV$ $a.e$ and $u_{n_k}\rightarrow u$ in $L^1$, $\nabla u_{n_k}$ converge weakly to $\nabla u$ in $L^2(\Omega)^2$ Since $u_{u_k}$ is in $L^2$ and bounded by $g$, we can obtain that $u_{n_k}$ is converge weakly in $L^2$. therefore we deduce that $\displaystyle F(u) \leq\liminf_{n_k\rightarrow \infty} F(u_{n_k}) = \inf F$ ## Ambrosio-Torelli Approximation (Convergence) The functional $F(u)$ can be written in approximation form by Ambrosio-Torelli. $$ AT_\epsilon(u,v) = \left\{\begin{array}{l} \displaystyle\int_{\Omega}(u-g)^2dx+\beta\int_\Omega v^2|\nabla u|^2 +\int_\Omega(\epsilon|\nabla v|^2+\frac{(v-1)^2}{4\epsilon})dx\hspace{3pt}(u,v)\in H^1(\Omega)^2 v\in\left[0,1\right].\\ +\infty\hspace{5pt} o.w \end{array}\right. $$ We aim to construct a sequence of function $\left(u_\epsilon, v_\epsilon\right)$ that converge to $\left(u, 1\right)$ such that the sequence $AT_\epsilon(u_\epsilon, v_\epsilon)\rightarrow F(u)$ That is we are willing to show that the final term will converge to $\mathcal{H}^1(S_u)$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/agqndL3.png) The final term can be written as $$ \displaystyle \int_{A_\epsilon}(\epsilon|\nabla v_\epsilon| ^2+\frac{(v_\epsilon-1)^2}{4\epsilon})dx+ \int_{B_\epsilon}(\epsilon|\nabla v_\epsilon|^2+\frac{(v_\epsilon-1)^2}{4\epsilon})dx+ \int_{\Omega \setminus(A_\epsilon\cup B_\epsilon)}(\epsilon|\nabla v_\epsilon|^2+\frac{(v_\epsilon-1)^2}{4\epsilon})dx $$ for $v_\epsilon$ be small on $A_\epsilon$ and $1-w(\epsilon)$ outside $A_\epsilon\cup B_\epsilon$ Therefore the equation above is equivalent to $$ \displaystyle \int_{A_\epsilon}\frac{1}{4\epsilon}dx+ \int_{B_\epsilon}\left(\epsilon|\nabla v_\epsilon|^2+\frac{(v_\epsilon-1)^2}{4\epsilon}\right)dx+ \int_{\Omega \setminus(A_\epsilon\cup B_\epsilon)}\left(\frac{w(\epsilon)^2}{4\epsilon}\right)dx $$ For choosing $w(\epsilon)$ and the bandwidth of $A_\epsilon$ such that the first and third term will vanish. Then the question will become $\displaystyle\lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow0}\int_{B_\epsilon}\left(\epsilon|\nabla v_\epsilon|^2+\frac{(v_\epsilon-1)^2}{4\epsilon}\right)dx$ Define that $\tau(x) = d(x,S_u)$ Define a real value function $\sigma_\epsilon$ such that $v_\epsilon(x) = \sigma_\epsilon(\tau(x))$ with $|\nabla \tau| = 1$ Rewrite the equation, we have $$ \displaystyle\int_{B_\epsilon}\left(\epsilon\sigma_\epsilon'(\tau(x))^2+\frac{\left(\sigma_\epsilon(\tau(x))-1\right)^2}{4\epsilon}\right)dx $$ Set $t = \tau(x)$ then the integration is thought as integrate through the set $\left\{x: \tau(x) = t\right\}$ Modify the integral we have $$ \displaystyle\int_{\eta_\epsilon}^{\gamma_\epsilon}\left(\epsilon\sigma_\epsilon'(t)^2+\frac{\left(\sigma_\epsilon(t)-1\right)^2}{4\epsilon}\right) \mathcal{H}\left(\left\{x: \tau(x) = t\right\}\right)dt $$ Since our problem is to minimize the functional, so that we set $$ \left\{\begin{array}{l}\sigma_\epsilon'(t) = \displaystyle \frac{\sigma_\epsilon(t)-1}{2\epsilon}\\ \sigma_\epsilon(\eta(\epsilon)) = 0\end{array}\right. $$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/Oe8TfUy.png) therefore, the region becomes $\displaystyle\frac{1}{2\epsilon}\int_{\eta_\epsilon}^{\gamma_\epsilon}e^{\left(\frac{\eta_\epsilon-t}{\epsilon}\right)}\mathcal{H(\left\{x:\tau(x) = t\right\})}dt$ Since $\mathcal{H}\left(\left\{x: \tau(x) = t\right\}\right)$ is a monotone decreasing function w.r.t $t$ ( 一圈一圈縮小) by the Mean value theorem, $\exists t_0$ such that $$ \displaystyle\frac{1}{2\epsilon}\int_{\eta_\epsilon}^{\gamma_\epsilon}e^{\left(\frac{\eta_\epsilon-t}{\epsilon}\right)}\mathcal{H(\left\{x:\tau(x) = t\right\})}dt \\ = \frac{\mathcal{H(\left\{x:\tau(x) = t_0\right\})}}{2\epsilon}\int_{\eta_\epsilon}^{\gamma_\epsilon}e^{\left(\frac{\eta_\epsilon-t}{\epsilon}\right)}dt\\ =\frac{\mathcal{H(\left\{x:\tau(x) = t_0\right\})}}{2}\left(1-e^{\left(\frac{\eta_\epsilon-\gamma_\epsilon}{\epsilon}\right)}\right) $$ take $\gamma_\epsilon$ such that $\displaystyle \frac{\gamma_\epsilon}{\epsilon} \rightarrow \infty$ then it converge to $\mathcal{H}^1(S_u)$ To sum up, We show the convergence of a sequence $AT_\epsilon(u_\epsilon, v_\epsilon)$ converge to $F(u)$ as $\left(u_\epsilon, v_\epsilon\right)\rightarrow(u,1)$ ## Existence of minimizer ### Coercivity given the pertubation ### Lower semi-continuous By the lemma above ## What's left? solution steepest descent method