---
# System prepended metadata

title: 'September 14 - 21, 2022'
tags: [Weekly Relay]

---

---
tags: Weekly Relay
---

# September 14 - 21, 2022

![](https://i.imgur.com/VJPrRS9.png)

_Hi everyone, thanks for checking out the Weekly Relay! Whether you hold MKR or DAI, own a vault, or want to get more involved in governance, this is your one-stop shop for MakerDAO updates._

Authors: @alec, @nothsa, @Sol_Invictus, and @Artem_Gordon

##### [Online PDF Version]([xxx](https://pdfhost.io/v/dSHxCGGx7_Weekly_Relay_September_14_21_2022))

---
## :fire: **CURRENT EVENTS** <!-- Alec -->

#### **[Endgame RFC DVC Calls](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/endgame-rfc-dvc-calls/17773/10)**

Recognized Delegate @twblack88 has hosted an open call to discuss and workshop the Endgame MIP-set.

<small>**Summary of the discussion's goals and format**</small>

As they stand, DVC (Decentralized Voter Committee) calls need more structure. These calls aim to surface particular topics and coordinate themes to focus the discussion on certain areas of the vast array of proposals. 

*Endgame RFC Calls* are held *without* the author of the discussed MIP to better shape feedback and to identify unbiased questions and concerns. This feedback gets honed into actionable items that focus DVC discussion on particular areas of interest or concern. 

Last week, the initial results of these meetings were shared in the appropriate thread, summarized below.

<small>[**RFC-DFV Feedback to Endgame Plan v3 Complete Overview**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/endgame-plan-v3-complete-overview/17427/4)</small>

**High-level direct endgame challenges:**

* Why not a phased rollout? What exactly is the point of bundling MIPs together?
* Many moving parts need a detailed execution plan to get right.
There is so much research and work/iterations in this design, but what’s missing is the implementation plan.
* What’s with the extended mandates around RWA?
* Shouldn’t there be incentives for collaboration and cooperation?
* MetaDAOs must be dynamic with exemplary leadership, a credible plan, and understandable tokenomics. Lacking those fundamentals is setting them up for failure.
* How do we ensure everyone interprets the information and context of the plan as intended?
* How can we iterate to make this better?
* How can we ensure that launching metaDAOs is not reinventing the governance wheel repeatedly?

<small>[**RFC-DFV Feedback to MIP83: Launch MetaDAO Clusters**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip83-recognized-launch-metadao-clusters/17709/6)</small>

* Is the clustering organic, or do we want to put some structure into creating the metaDAOs? Do current teams pick a color?
* The definition of these mDAO types is missing from the MIP. It probably needs another component explaining the protector, creator, and governor DAOs.
* Things like what roles are initially present, expected responsibilities, interaction (or not) with other metaDAOs, constraints on business, the definition of intangible value, etc.
* Highly recommend a legal audit.
* What levels of governance will be owned by the MetaDAOs versus Maker core? If we are still using the executive vote mechanism to pass MIPs… how do the governance systems interact?
* How do the budget and incentives work when metaDAOs form?
* How do budgets change as the metaDAOs bootstrap?
* What does this look like when they are fully operational?
* What is the relationship between scopes and clusters?

<small>[**RFC-DFV Feedback to MIP84: Activate Protocol-Owned Vault Emulation**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip84-activate-protocol-owned-vault-emulation/17713/21)</small>

* Surplus buffer changes wildly if we have excess liabilities.
dss-kiln was never tested or audited. Is there a way to slowly scale this up test by test? (1 mil at a clip was suggested)
* Where is the leverage coming from?
* Seems like this is out of sequence? Wouldn’t the POVE be after ETHD?

<small>[**RFC-DFV Feedback to MIP39c3-SP4: Offboarding the Events Core Unit (EVENTS-001)**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip39c3-sp4-offboarding-the-events-core-unit-events-001/17755/3)</small>

* Does the EVENTS-001 Failed Offboarding carry any weight? Governance just said 'no' to offboarding events; what’s the point if it’s up for a vote again?
* Should offboarding, in general, be bundled?

<small>[**RFC-DFV Feedback to MIP39c3-SP3: Offboarding the Strategic Happiness Core Unit (SH-001)**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip39c3-sp3-offboarding-the-strategic-happiness-core-unit-sh-001/17754/4)</small>

* Are the offboarding(s) necessary to Endgame?
* How does Marketing play into Endgame?

These calls represent an ideal starting point if you want to understand the Endgame Plan or participate in its development.

Endgame DVC RFC calls are held on Friday at 14:30 UTC. Meeting details can be found [**via this link,**](https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MTRnazRnMmRzZzlkOGhwa2pqbDVxbzFtOHNfMjAyMjA5MDlUMTQzMDAwWiBtYWtlcmRhby5jb21fM2VmaG0yZ2hpcGtzZWdsMDA5a3RuaW9tZGtAZw/YWhvcm5lcjEyM0BnbWFpbC5jb20?scp=ALL&sf=true) or through the [**original post.**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/endgame-rfc-dvc-calls/17773)

#### **[Endgame: Informal Sentiment Poll](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/informal-poll-on-support-for-runes-endgame-proposal/17951)**

Posted by @psychonaut, the poll aims to gauge community sentiment surrounding the Endgame Plan, with all votes remaining anonymous. 

![](https://i.imgur.com/xUGSHyh.png)

*'No'* currently leads with around 38% of the total votes.

#### **[Endgame Breakdown with LongForWisdom on the *'The Raphael, Schuppi, & ElPro MakerDAO Happy Hour'*](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvuOtnDu8o4)**

@LongForWisdom shared detailed, unbiased insight into the [**current Endgame design**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/lfws-endgame-commentary/17907) and followed with a [**post outlining his interpretations**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/lfws-endgame-commentary/17907) of the model's strengths and weaknesses.

All of these will be covered in summary below.

<small> **Summary of the discussion:** </small>

**MetaDAOs** fuse the creation of a new DAO with an individual Core Unit or Units. Under this format, contributors form a new DAO aligned with Maker and its principles. This alignment must be placed before goals separate from the DAO. 

The structure allows for more governance direction but "a way that benefits both Maker and the metaDAO itself."

> "The idea is, as you participate in Maker Core as a contributor or customer, you accrue these [meta]Tokens and become involved with the [growth and activities] of the metaDAO.
>
>"Maker benefits by creating a redundant, decentralized workforce."

MetaDAOs are incentivized to perform to the full extent of their mandate and are held fully responsible for their actions relative to the Maker Protocol. 

This scenario benefits the theoretical metaDAO while shielding Maker from major disruptions affecting the central product. 

*They do not, however, come without risk.*

> "The first risk I want to highlight is the risk that MetaDAOs cannot create/attract/retain meaningful communities."

**1. Not everyone wants to create and manage an entire community.**

> "I hypothesize that, in general, the ability and desire to attract, create, organize and operate a community is rarer than most assume. Further, individuals with both the desire and ability are likely to self-select themselves into roles where they can express that ability and desire naturally."

**2. Self-determination seems to have been a key rallying point in existing DAO Communities, and MetaDAOs cannot meaningfully self-determine.**

> "Without the commitment to decentralization from the Maker Foundation, I doubt as many individuals would have been attracted to the project. Anecdotally, I would not have been."

**3. The given examples of successful Meta-Engineering don’t have very successful or high-quality communities.**

Examples of these endeavors came through Uniswap, Unit Bias Memecoin, and the early BTC community. Further, he questions the utility and inherent value of these proposes mDAO tokens. 

> "This might be more tidily summed up by the question: “Would you be willing to get paid for your work only in vested MDAO tokens?” I’d argue that a large share of individuals wouldn’t work solely for vested *MKR tokens*, let alone *MDAO tokens*."

Lastly, the issue of *politics*, and its interlaced drama, was addressed - a source of distraction that Long believes metaDAOs may amplify rather than contain. 

In a flat organization like a DAO, the humanity of business is a very noticeable factor. Altering the structure of this relationship won't mitigate the inevitability of human nature. 

But, separating the workforce won't make it any less *human*. The same political issues will persist and could even be amplified by the inherent "ownership" attached to the establishment of a metaDAO.

<small> **The Protocol-owned vault (POVE)** </small>

As a very high-level overview, the POVE functions to acquire ETH and mint DAI.

Traditionally, user-operated vaults are subjected to safety measures like stability fees, collateralization ratios, and liquidations to bolster Protocol security. 

Instead, The POVE is afforded certain luxuries to ensure it traverses a less adversarial path. As it's owned and operated by Maker and not an end-user, it wouldn't face the same set-in-stone stability fees and liquidation ratios.

In a "trustless" space, these hard-coded "laws" are designed to shield the protocol from the intentions of unknown parties, but the POVE is owned and operated exclusively by the Maker Protocol.

> "Because Maker owns this vault and is the only one using it, we don't need as many explicit mechanisms to ensure its safety... We can, essentially, allow a lot more than we would for [user-owned] vaults."

LFW sees many benefits to the proposed model, but peg security stands out as the most impactful for a few reasons. 

* This extra DAI can then be used to manage the peg through volatile stretches.
* Provided the POVE is fitted with ample ETH, Maker could mint and market sell DAI when its price is high and repurchase it if it drops below one dollar. In other words, arbitrage at scale.
* Something quite evident on the surface, but much collateral is needed to mint enough DAI to affect its market price in either direction. For example, to mint $3B DAI, the DAO would need to own $4B in ETH. The POVE then serves to slowly build ETH reserves, which could then be deployed to protect the peg if required.

<small>**RWAs**</small>

**Cash-like RWAs** - These include options similar to the PSM or the procurement of US Treasury bonds. These assets aren't fully decentralized but offer the DAO a means to earn consistent yield or expand DAI's market reach. USDC is the most accurate example of this asset type currently being used.

The primary benefit of this asset class is it affords DAI liquidity. This would allow the protocol to offer direct swaps through the PSM, meaning if the demand for DAI rapidly changes, this mechanism could absorb the market pressure.

**Clean Money RWAs** - Long sees these assets as a net positive. If RWAs are to be a long-term part of the system, it would be ideal for the majority to be carbon negative or neutral.

This initiative also serves to assuage potential regulation. If the protocol had a positive global impact, it would be far less politically feasible to "shut it down." 

The call ended with a direct question. "Where do you see the most pressing risks in the current plan?" Long's response was simple yet elegant. 

> "The major risk is that [Endgame's] based on the assumption that may not turn out to be true."

#### MKR and DAI comp discussions <!-- Alec -->

[**Compensation discussion from Delegate office hours:**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3VZfwvQ1wQ)

This discussion is often approached, circled, and inevitably bookmarked, only to be picked up again, so the process repeats. 

This is due to the problem's complexity and the variety of different approaches offered to date. It's not just a matter of doing or not, but also where, how, and why.

These conflicting factors make it difficult to standardize across the entire DAO. A flat rate across all units neglects achievements, prowess, and general importance to business continuity. 

And then on the other hand, the weighting of "importance" is subjective, differing from person to person. In other words, the problem itself is rooted in instability, so calculating the "correct" parameters is quite difficult. 

As @Aes put it:

> "With something like this, the devil's in the details."

The call concludes by identifying areas with the least clarity, as those should take priority as we move toward a finely tuned framework.

[**Compensation Discussion from Governance & Risk**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WE2QxmsiKJw&t=3543s) (timestamped)

The proposal, authored by Recognized Delegate @CodeKnight, seeks to establish a standardized framework for contributor compensation. He spoke about the proposed changes during the last G&R call (linked above). 

First, this proposal was written as a means to grant the conversation legs. Assistance from anyone with more experience in vesting structures would be appreciated, as little feedback has been offered.  

Without a framework, we leave room for personal agendas to conflict with business. These lengthy vesting discussions not only cut into a CUs time but also often lead to conflict. 

CodeKnight hopes that, through a structured framework, contributors would have more insight into whether or not vesting is worth pursuing in a given period. This would ideally mean fewer proposals for delegates to dissect and less uncertainty for DAO contributors. 

@monkey.irish also spoke on the importance of talent retention. We've seen a recent trend of "tightening the belt buckle," but he believes a certain misrepresentation exists. Many DAO contributors are not being overpaid relative to comparable positions in the traditional space, but quite the opposite. 

He worries that the DAO's long-term strategic positioning could take a large hit if this trend continues. 

---
#### **Coinbase proposal discussion** <!-- new style = bold links -->

GovAlpha Core Unit Facilitator Patrick_J presented some governance-related concerns regarding [**MIP81: Coinbase USDC Institutional Rewards**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip81-coinbase-usdc-institutional-rewards/17703) during last week's [**Governance & Risk call**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WE2QxmsiKJw&t=1820s). 

Among other issues, GovAlpha believes that MIP81:

* Does not follow the standard MIP Template
* Is lacking in completeness and clarity, two of the five core principles outlined in [**MIP0**](https://github.com/makerdao/mips/blob/master/MIP0/mip0.md)
* Is too focused on low-level information and lacking in high-level information
* Appears to instruct GovAlpha to oversee the transfer of funds to Coinbase without oversight from the wider MakerDAO organization

Proposed solutions include
ensuring that the MIP adheres to the MIP template,
appointing an Arranger, and
adding provisions for assessment by a legal team and other Core Units.

Check out the [**slides**](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1YmHmC7n4HZu6P0easVtsc2X21nvDlWZzSzI0tCl3fvA/edit#slide=id.g14756a2645c_0_0) on this topic for a quick at-a-glance summary of GovAlpha's viewpoint, or watch the video segment (about half an hour) if you're interested in catching the full discussion.

##### **Coinbase Live Call with CFO! 😎**

The discussion prompted GovAlpha to arrange a [one-on-one public call](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/coinbase-mip81-cfo-community-questions-monday-september-26/18037) with Coinbase's Chief Financial Officer, Alesia Haas. Prose11, a neutral third party, is moderating a [**thread**](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/coinbase-mip81-live-call-with-coinbase-cfo-questions-needed-asap/18007) where anyone may submit their questions in preparation for the call. 

> All community members can attend and listen in. There will be a [dedicated channel in the MakerDAO Discord](https://chat.makerdao.com/) for real-time discussions during the interview.

Submissions must be received by 17:00 UTC on Thursday, September 22nd.

###### The call will take place on [september 26 4:30 UTC]

#### **Merge POAP**

During the same call, Patrick_J also [**presented**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WE2QxmsiKJw&t=865s) the Maker Merge POAP, commemorating the blockchain historical event of the successful Ethereum 2.0 merge. 

Anyone who attended the live merge watch party should have received their POAP already, but any MakerDAO contributor or community member is eligible. Get in touch with @prose11 or @Patrick_J on the forums to claim yours!

![](https://i.imgur.com/QoWthYV.png)

---
## 🏛 This Week in Governance 

### **[Weekly MIPs Update #105](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/weekly-mips-update-105/17999)**

*Ratification polls, proposals, and pre-MIP discussions.*

---
### Executive Vote(s)

_Why, hello there!_ :wave: _Coming for your hebdomadal voting fix?_ As it was announced on our latest G&R Call, this week bares [no new Executive Proposals](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/no-planned-executive-2022-09-21/17992) to ponder: 

> _"@Protocol-Engineering has expressed a desire to limit executives to whenever possible every week to help manage dev bandwidth and keep costs associated with executive spells down. While we may not always be able to accommodate this wish (and will seek to amend our MIPs if this becomes formal practice), when appropriate, we will opt for taking a week off of executives"._

Nevertheless, you can still further explore the effects of the last one to be passed:

> [**Core Unit Budget Streams, SPF Funding, HVBank Legal Update, MKR Stream Accounting Cleanup**](https://vote.makerdao.com/executive/template-executive-vote-core-unit-budget-streams-spf-funding-hvbank-legal-update-mkr-stream-accounting-cleanup-september-14-2022#proposal-detail) – _Passed on September 16<sup>th</sup>, 14:49, 2022. Executed on September 18<sup>th</sup>, 2022, 14:50 UTC._

-   A total of **3,004,859** DAI was streamed to two Core Units:
    - **667,055 DAI** were streamed to the [DAI Foundation Core Unit](https://mips.makerdao.com/mips/details/MIP39c2SP17) (DAIF-001).
    - **2,337,804 DAI** were streamed to the [Oracles Core Unit](https://mips.makerdao.com/mips/details/MIP40c3SP75) (ORA-001).
- A total of **80,000 DAI** was transferred to two Special Purpose Fund multisig wallets. Check [MIP55c3-SP6](https://mips.makerdao.com/mips/details/MIP55c3SP6) & [MIP55c3-SP8](https://mips.makerdao.com/mips/details/MIP55c3SP8) to learn more!
- MKR Stream Cleanup:
    - As per this [forum post](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/executive-inclusion-gro-001-mkr-vesting-stream-clean-up/17820), the MKR stream that was previously streaming MKR to the Growth Core Unit before it was [redirected](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x2755d689a8939e0d95c15bef1cfa14d048b79bb218362338fc9173657643c382) to the [Maker Pause Proxy](https://etherscan.io/address/0xbe8e3e3618f7474f8cb1d074a26affef007e98fb) has had the remaining MKR balance vested. This action is for accounting purposes only and will not affect the balance of MKR in the Pause Proxy. See the [forum post](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/executive-inclusion-gro-001-mkr-vesting-stream-clean-up/17820) for more details.
- As per this [governance poll](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmX81EhP), the IPFS hash for the HVBank Legal Agreement was amended to _QmQx3bMtjncka2jUsGwKu7ButuPJFn9yDEEvpg9xZ71ECh._

---
### Active Poll(s)

#### **Ratification Poll(s)** <!-- we can make poll names shorter -->

Less than a week to go for these:

| Poll Name | Discussion |Start Date | End Date | 
|:---------:|:----------:|:---------:|:--------:|
| [Amend Measurement Period For Delegate Participation Metrics](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmdmeiQg) | [Discussion](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip4c2-sp24-amend-measurement-period-for-delegate-participation-metrics/16904) | September 12 16:00 UTC | September 26 16:00 UTC |
| [MakerDAO Delegates MIP Set](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmUvMPe2) | [Discussion](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip77-delegates-in-the-maker-protocol/16905) | September 12 16:00 UTC | September 26 16:00 UTC |
| [MKR Compensation for StarkNet Engineering Core Unit](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmWX6BSA) | [Discussion](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip40c3-sp79-mkr-compensation-for-starknet-engineering-core-unit-sne-001/17042) | September 12 16:00 UTC | September 26 16:00 UTC |
| [SPF for The Ambassador Program](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmcJQCyW) | [Discussion](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip55c3-sp7-special-purpose-fund-for-the-ambassador-program/17169) | September 12 16:00 UTC | September 26 16:00 UTC |
| [Modify GovAlpha Core Unit MKR Budget](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmUoGryZ) | [Discussion](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip40c3-sp80-modify-govalpha-core-unit-mkr-budget-q3-2022/17164) | September 12 16:00 UTC | September 26 16:00 UTC |
| [Strategic Happiness Core Unit Offboarding](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/Qmc9Un8i) | [Discussion](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip39c3-sp2-strategic-happiness-core-unit-sh-001-offboarding/16438) | September 12 16:00 UTC | September 26 16:00 UTC |

---
#### **Community Greenlight Poll(s)**

| Greenlight Poll | Vote Breakdown | Start Date | End Date |
| :-------------: | :------------: | :--------: | :------: |
| [RFA (RFA - Canadian Federally Regulated Mortgage Originator)](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmYRjEA9) |![](https://i.imgur.com/uewFJeY.png)| September 19 16:00 UTC | October 3 16:00 UTC |

---
### Finished Poll(s)

#### **Passed**

| Greenlight Poll | Vote Breakdown | End Date |
| :-------------: | :------------: | :------: |
| [GNO (GnosisDAO)](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmcUnpWV) |![](https://i.imgur.com/bN5FInB.png)| September 19 16:00 UTC |

#### **Not Passed**

| Greenlight Poll | Vote Breakdown | End Date |
| :-------------: | :------------: |:------: |
| [GUNIV3-BUSD-DAI (Gelato Uniswap v3 BUSD-DAI)](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmWAe8Qs) |![](https://i.imgur.com/yy8mU5v.png)| September 19 16:00 UTC |
| [GAMMA UNI-V3-WBTC-RENBTC (Gamma Uniswap v3 wBTC-renBTC)](https://vote.makerdao.com/polling/QmQSNkUh) |![](https://i.imgur.com/8Abjy36.png)| September 19 16:00 UTC |

---
![](https://i.imgur.com/KHfK7lt.gif)

_That is all for this one, folks! Until next time!_ 

---  
## :phone: **Meetings and Events** <!-- Artem -->

**Last Week's Call Recordings:**

- Delegate Office Hours | [Forum](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/delegate-office-hours-11/17878) | [Recording](https://youtu.be/p3VZfwvQ1wQ)
- Governance & Risk #208 | [Forum](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-and-risk-208-thursday-september-15-at-17-00-utc/17887) | [Recording](https://youtu.be/WE2QxmsiKJw)
- Decentralized Voter Committee | [Forum](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/endgame-call-today-9pm-cest/17911) | [Recording](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxhsmhUAxJw)

**Upcoming Calls:**

- Delegate Office Hours | [Forum](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/delegate-office-hours-12/18012) | [Join Here](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88286550832?pwd%3DdWQzQi9tYlNyemJJS2Nrd2NUdTBoZz09&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1664286914453495&usg=AOvVaw3vPsctBpUzg_Lr0ay7wN8J) - Passcode: 690611 | [date=2022-09-22 time=16:00:00 timezone="UTC"]
- Governance & Risk #208 | [Forum](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-and-risk-209-thursday-september-22-at-17-00-utc/18020) | [Join Here](https://zoom.us/j/697074715) - Passcode: 748478 | [date=2022-09-22 time=17:00:00 timezone="UTC"]
- Endgame RFC DVC | [Forum](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://forum.makerdao.com/t/endgame-rfc-dvcs/17773&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1663616586558467&usg=AOvVaw1Yx-oF2VZt-0bPGbb__Gmi) | [Join Here](https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87005527061?pwd=bHN0M2ExY1hQU0xFcENsREhEUFJPUT09) | [date=2022-09-23 time=15:00:00 timezone="UTC"]
- Coinbase MIP81: CFO<> Community Questions | [Forum](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/coinbase-mip81-cfo-community-questions-monday-september-26/18037) | [Join Here](https://www.crowdcast.io/c/coinbase-mip81-session-1) | [date=2022-09-26 time=16:30:00 timezone="UTC"]

---
### Core Unit Office Hours <!-- UPDATE EVERY MONTH -->

- [Join Link](https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82603350722?pwd=RThleVo5QlBRT1FuOWxiRCs3K0k2Zz09) | GovAlpha Governance Q&As - Mondays at 17:00 UTC
- [Join Link](meet.google.com/frj-vpji-huc) | Immunefi Security - Every Other Monday at 23:00 UTC | Alternative [Join Link](https://makerdao.bigbluemeeting.com/adm-eox-jtz-tsi) - Every Other Wednesday at 15:00 UTC
- [Join Link](https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85252786103?pwd=bEZaZXdEcGlSWWd5bmpxMDBvVjdEUT09) | Sustainable Ecosystem Scaling - Tuesdays at 13:30 UTC
- [Join Link](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://meet.google.com/bjm-qiup-hif&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1620493080631000&usg=AOvVaw056SKuyQn3F67FAtJTPIbl) | Protocol Engineering - Tuesdays at 15:00 UTC
- [Join Link](https://meet.google.com/vmp-jiwx-nkn) | Strategic Finance (bIBTA SPF) | Tuesday, August 30th at 17:00 UTC
- [Join Link](https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81560369659) | 6S Capital - Every Other Wednesday at 14:00 UTC
- [Join Link](https://meet.google.com/sap-nttu-xga) | Growth - First Wednesday of Each Month at 17:00 UTC
- [Join Link](https://meet.google.com/kwf-qayf-xdq) | Real World Finance - Every Other Wednesday at 18:00 UTC 
- [Join Link](https://meet.google.com/nio-jrqq-guu) | Governance Communications - Fridays at 18:00 UTC

## ⚓ **Resources**

<details><summary>Open List</summary><br>

> [All Available Dashboards](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/all-available-dashboards/16104)

> [All Available Guides](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/all-available-guides/16159)

> [Calls Calendar](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/the-calls-calendar/16095)

> [Forum](https://forum.makerdao.com) and [Maker Discord](https://discord.gg/YtBXXYuVDB)

> [Governance Dashboard Tracker](https://www.makerdao-governance-dashboard.com/tracker) | [Google Sheet Version](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LWNlv6hr8oXebk8rvXZBPRVDjN-3OrzI0IgLwBVk0vM/edit#gid=0)
    > > [Forum discussions - Governance Dashboard](https://www.makerdao-governance-dashboard.com/tracker/forum-discussions)

> [Know Your MIP Index](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/know-your-mip-index/6768)

> [Learning Portal](https://community-development.makerdao.com/en/learn/) and [Technical Documentation](https://docs.makerdao.com/)

> [MakerDAO’s Discord Servers](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/makerdaos-discord-servers/16110)

> [MakerBurn](https://makerburn.com/#/rundown)

> [Office Hours List](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/office-hours-list/16162)

> [Participation Tools](https://community-development.makerdao.com/en/learn/governance/participate)

> [Votes and Important Dates Calendar](https://forum.makerdao.com/t/the-votes-and-important-dates-calendar/16096)

</details></br>

### Disclaimer

*Disclaimer: This update is assembled by a group of members in the MakerDAO community. This does not serve as financial advice or an inducement to vote in any specific way. This update is for information and communication purposes only.*